Adaptive step goals and rewards: a longitudinal growth model of daily steps for a smartphone-based walking intervention
- 474 Downloads
Adaptive interventions are an emerging class of behavioral interventions that allow for individualized tailoring of intervention components over time to a person’s evolving needs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an adaptive step goal + reward intervention, grounded in Social Cognitive Theory delivered via a smartphone application (Just Walk), using a mixed modeling approach. Participants (N = 20) were overweight (mean BMI = 33.8 ± 6.82 kg/m2), sedentary adults (90% female) interested in participating in a 14-week walking intervention. All participants received a Fitbit Zip that automatically synced with Just Walk to track daily steps. Step goals and expected points were delivered through the app every morning and were designed using a pseudo-random multisine algorithm that was a function of each participant’s median baseline steps. Self-report measures were also collected each morning and evening via daily surveys administered through the app. The linear mixed effects model showed that, on average, participants significantly increased their daily steps by 2650 (t = 8.25, p < 0.01) from baseline to intervention completion. A non-linear model with a quadratic time variable indicated an inflection point for increasing steps near the midpoint of the intervention and this effect was significant (t2 = −247, t = −5.01, p < 0.001). An adaptive step goal + rewards intervention using a smartphone app appears to be a feasible approach for increasing walking behavior in overweight adults. App satisfaction was high and participants enjoyed receiving variable goals each day. Future mHealth studies should consider the use of adaptive step goals + rewards in conjunction with other intervention components for increasing physical activity.
KeywordsAdaptive goals Walking behavior mHealth Personalized behavior change
Funding was provided by National Science Foundation (Grant Number IIS-1449751).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Elizabeth V. Korinek, Sayali S. Phatak, Cesar A. Martin, Mohammad T. Freigoun, Daniel E. Rivera, Marc A. Adams, Pedja Klasnja, Matthew P. Buman, and Eric B. Hekler declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- Direito, A., Carraça, E., Rawstorn, J., Whittaker, R., & Maddison, R. (2017). mHealth technologies to influence physical activity and sedentary behaviors: Behavior change techniques, systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 51(2), 226–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferguson, T., Rowlands, A. V., Olds, T., & Maher, C. (2015). The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Freigoun, M. T., Martín, C. A., Magann, A. B., Rivera, D. E., Phatak, S. S., Korinek, E. V., et al. (2017). System identification of just walk: A behavioral mhealth intervention for promoting physical activity. In Proceedings of the 2017 American control conference, May 24–26, Seattle, WA (in press).Google Scholar
- Hekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Poothakandiyil, N., Rivera, D. E., Dzierzewski, J. M., Morgan, A. A., et al. (2013). Exploring behavioral markers of long-term physical activity maintenance a case study of system identification modeling within a behavioral intervention. Health Education and Behavior, 40, 51S–62S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hochberg, I., Feraru, G., Kozdoba, M., Mannor, S., Tennenholtz, M., & Yom-Tov, E. (2016). A reinforcement learning system to encourage physical activity in diabetes patients. arXiv:1605.04070
- Hurley, J. C., Hollingshead, K. E., Todd, M., Jarrett, C. L., Tucker, W. J., Angadi, S. S., et al. (2015). The walking interventions through texting (WalkIT) trial: Rationale, design, and protocol for a factorial randomized controlled trial of adaptive interventions for overweight and obese, inactive adults. JMIR Research Protocols, 4, e108.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., & Strub, H. B. (2006). Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In International conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 261–278). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ljung, L. (1999). System identification: Theory for the use (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Martín, C. A., Deshpande, S., Hekler, E. B., & Rivera, D. E. (2015a). A system identification approach for improving behavioral interventions based on social cognitive theory. In IEEE 2015 American control conference (ACC) (pp. 5878–5883).Google Scholar
- Martín, C. A., Rivera, D. E., & Hekler, E. B. (2015b). Design of informative identification experiments for behavioral interventions. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC Symposium on system identification, Beijing, China (Vol. 48, pp. 1325–1330).Google Scholar
- Martín, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Riley, W. T., Hekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Adams, M. A., et al., (2014). A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. In IEEE 2014 American control conference (pp. 2407–2412).Google Scholar
- Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team, (2016). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-128. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
- Poirier, J., Bennett, W. L., Jerome, G. J., Shah, N. G., Lazo, M., Yeh, H. C., et al. (2016). Effectiveness of an activity tracker-and internet-based adaptive walking program for adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 18, e34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rivera, D. E., Pew, M. D., Collins, L. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2005). Engineering control approaches for the design and analysis of adaptive, time-varying interventions. The Methodology Center Technical Report, 05–73.Google Scholar
- Spruijt-Metz, D., Hekler, E., Saranummi, N., Intille, S., Korhonen, I., Nilsen, W., et al. (2015a). Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: New opportunities in behavioral research. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5, 335–346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1979). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Implications for motivation theory and practice. In R. M. Steers, L. W. Porter, & G. A. Bigley (Eds.), Motivation and Work Behavior (pp. 126–140). Boston: MA. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar