Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 1065–1075 | Cite as

Blood pressure outcomes of medication adherence interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Vicki S. Conn
  • Todd M. Ruppar
  • Jo-Ana D. Chase
Article

Abstract

This systematic review applied meta-analytic procedures to integrate primary research that examined blood pressure outcomes of medication adherence interventions. Random-effects model analysis calculated standardized mean difference effect sizes. Exploratory dichotomous and continuous moderator analyses using meta-analytic analogues of ANOVA and regression were performed. Codable data were extracted from 156 reports with 60,876 participants. The overall weighted mean difference systolic effect size was 0.235 across 161 treatment versus control comparisons. The diastolic effect size was 0.189 from 181 comparisons. Effect sizes were significantly heterogeneous. Common risks of bias included lack of allocation concealment, unmasked data collectors, and absent intention-to-treat analyses. Exploratory moderator analyses suggested that habit-based interventions may be most effective. The largest effect sizes were for interventions delivered by pharmacists. The modest magnitude effect sizes suggest future research should explore novel higher dose interventions that might address multiple levels of influence on adherence behavior.

Keywords

Medication adherence Blood pressure Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The project was funded by the American Heart Association (13GRNT16550001) and the National Institutes of Health (R01NR011990). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Heart Association or the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Vicki S. Conn, Todd M. Ruppar and Jo-Ana D. Chase declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

10865_2016_9730_MOESM1_ESM.docx (42 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 43 kb)

References

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, England: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bramlage, P., & Hasford, J. (2009). Blood pressure reduction, persistence and costs in the evaluation of antihypertensive drug treatment—A review. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 8, 18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnier, M. (2014). Managing ‘resistance’: Is adherence a target for treatment? Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 23, 439–443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cappuccio, F. P., Kerry, S. M., Forbes, L., & Donald, A. (2004). Blood pressure control by home monitoring: Meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ, 329, 145.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. CDC. (2015). High blood pressure fact sheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fs_bloodpressure.htm.
  6. Chapman, R. H., Ferrufino, C. P., Kowal, S. L., Classi, P., & Roberts, C. S. (2010). The cost and effectiveness of adherence-improving interventions for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 64, 169–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, A., Osterberg, L. G., & Hansen, E. H. (2009). Electronic monitoring of patient adherence to oral antihypertensive medical treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Hypertension, 27, 1540–1551.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, C. E., Smith, L. F., Taylor, R. S., & Campbell, J. L. (2011). Nurse-led interventions used to improve control of high blood pressure in people with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 28, 250–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Conn, V. S., Hafdahl, A. R., Mehr, D. R., LeMaster, J. W., Brown, S. A., & Nielsen, P. J. (2007). Metabolic effects of interventions to increase exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia, 50, 913–921.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Conn, V. S., & Rantz, M. J. (2003). Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta-analyses. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conn, V. S., Ruppar, T., Chase, J., Enriquez, M., & Cooper, P. (2015). Interventions to improve hypertension medication adherence behavior: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Hypertension Reports, 17, 94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conn, V. S., Ruppar, T., Enriquez, M., & Cooper, P. S. (2016). Medication adherence interventions that target subjects with adherence problems: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 12, 218–246.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Cornelissen, V. A., & Smart, N. A. (2013). Exercise training for blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2, e004473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. De Geest, S., Ruppar, T., Berben, L., Schonfeld, S., & Hill, M. N. (2014). Medication non-adherence as a critical factor in the management of presumed resistant hypertension: A narrative review. EuroIntervention, 9, 1102–1109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. de Vet, H. C., de Bie, R. A., van der Heijden, G. J., Verhagen, A. P., Sijpkes, P., & Kipschild, P. (1997). Systematic review on the basis of methodological criteria. Physiotherapy, 83, 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devine, E. (1997). Issues and challenges in coding interventions for meta-analysis of prevention research. In W. Bukoski (Ed.), Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs (pp. 130–146. NIDA research monograph; 170). Retrieved from http://archives.drugabuse.gov/pdf/monographs/monograph170/monograph170.pdf.
  18. Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., & Lefebvre, C. (1994). Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ, 309, 1286–1291.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Dragomir, A., Cote, R., Roy, L., Blais, L., Lalonde, L., Berard, A., et al. (2010). Impact of adherence to antihypertensive agents on clinical outcomes and hospitalization costs. Medical Care, 48, 418–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Easterbrook, P. J. (1992). Directory of registries of clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 11, 363–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Erdine, S., & Arslan, E. (2013). Monitoring treatment adherence in hypertension. Current Hypertension Reports, 15, 269–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Glynn, L. G., Murphy, A. W., Smith, S. M., Schroeder, K., & Fahey, T. (2010). Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Art. No.: CD005182. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD005182.pub4
  23. Gupta, A. K., Arshad, S., & Poulter, N. R. (2010). Compliance, safety, and effectiveness of fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents: A meta-analysis. Hypertension, 55, 399–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gwadry-Sridhar, F. H., Manias, E., Lal, L., Salas, M., Hughes, D. A., Ratzki-Leewing, A., et al. (2013). Impact of interventions on medication adherence and blood pressure control in patients with essential hypertension: A systematic review by the ISPOR medication adherence and persistence special interest group. Value in Health, 16, 863–871.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hedges, L., & Vevea, J. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higgins, J., Altman, D., & Sterne, J. (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In J. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Retrieved from http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_8/8_assessing_risk_of_bias_in_included_studies.htm.
  28. Iskedjian, M., Einarson, T. R., MacKeigan, L. D., Shear, N., Addis, A., Mittmann, N., et al. (2002). Relationship between daily dose frequency and adherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Clinical Therapeutics, 24, 302–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jayasinghe, J. (2009). Non-adherence in the hypertensive patient: Can nursing play a role in assessing and improving compliance? Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19, 7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jung, O., Gechter, J. L., Wunder, C., Paulke, A., Bartel, C., Geiger, H., et al. (2013). Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis. Journal of Hypertension, 31, 766–774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Langham, J., Thompson, E., & Rowen, K. (1999). Identification of randomized controlled trials from the emergency medicine literature: Comparison of hand searching versus MEDLINE searching. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 34, 25–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis, L. M. (2012). Factors associated with medication adherence in hypertensive blacks: A review of the literature. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 27, 208–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, L. M., Ogedegbe, C., & Ogedegbe, G. (2012). Enhancing adherence of antihypertensive regimens in hypertensive African-Americans: Current and future prospects. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 10, 1375–1380.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, e1–e34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Matthes, J., & Albus, C. (2014). Improving adherence with medication: A selective literature review based on the example of hypertension treatment. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 111, 41–47.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgado, M. P., Morgado, S. R., Mendes, L. C., Pereira, L. J., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2011). Pharmacist interventions to enhance blood pressure control and adherence to antihypertensive therapy: Review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 68, 241–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Neter, J. E., Stam, B. E., Kok, F. J., Grobbee, D. E., & Geleijnse, J. M. (2003). Influence of weight reduction on blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hypertension, 42, 878–884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nieuwlaat, R., Wilczynski, N., Navarro, T., Hobson, N., Jeffery, R., Keepanasseril, A., et al. (2014). Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Orwin, R., & Vevea, J. (2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 177–203). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Raudenbush, S. (2009). Random effects models. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 295–315). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Rothstein, H. R., & Hopewell, S. (2009). Grey literature. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 103–125). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Schroeder, K., Fahey, T., & Ebrahim, S. (2004). Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Art.No.:CD004804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004804
  44. Shadish, W., & Haddock, C. (2009). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 257–277). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Sherrill, B., Halpern, M., Khan, S., Zhang, J., & Panjabi, S. (2011). Single-pill vs free-equivalent combination therapies for hypertension: A meta-analysis of health care costs and adherence. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 13, 898–909.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Simpson, S. H., Eurich, D. T., Majumdar, S. R., Padwal, R. S., Tsuyuki, R. T., Varney, J., et al. (2006). A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality. BMJ, 333, 15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Stern, J. M., & Simes, R. J. (1997). Publication bias: Evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ, 315, 640–645.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Sutton, A. J. (2009). Publicaton bias. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 435–452). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  49. Takiya, L. N., Peterson, A. M., & Finley, R. S. (2004). Meta-analysis of interventions for medication adherence to antihypertensives. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 38, 1617–1624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Uhlig, K., Patel, K., Ip, S., Kitsios, G. D., & Balk, E. M. (2013). Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159, 185–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Valentine, J. (2009). Judging the quality of primary research. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 129–146). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Verberk, W. J., Kessels, A. G., & Thien, T. (2011). Telecare is a valuable tool for hypertension management, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Pressure Monitoring, 16, 149–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Vrijens, B., Vincze, G., Kristanto, P., Urquhart, J., & Burnier, M. (2008). Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: Longitudinal study of electronically compiled dosing histories. BMJ, 336, 1114–1117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. White, H. (2009). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 51–71). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Wofford, M. R., & Minor, D. S. (2009). Hypertension: Issues in control and resistance. Current Hypertension Reports, 11, 323–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wood, J. A. (2008). Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicki S. Conn
    • 1
  • Todd M. Ruppar
    • 2
  • Jo-Ana D. Chase
    • 3
  1. 1.School of NursingUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations