Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying when choice helps: clarifying the relationships between choice making, self-construal, and pain

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research indicates that making choices before a painful task can sometimes reduce pain. We examined the possibility that independent and interdependent self-construals moderate the effect of choice on pain. Further, we tested between two types of choice: instrumental and non-instrumental. Healthy normotensive undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of three conditions prior to the cold pressor task. Participants in an instrumental choice condition selected which hand to immerse in the water and were told this choice might help reduce their pain. Non-instrumental choice participants selected which hand to immerse but were given no information about potential pain reduction. Control participants were given no choice or additional instructions. Low interdependence individuals reported less pain than high interdependence individuals—but only when given an instrumental choice. These data indicate that not all forms of choice reduce pain and not all individuals benefit from choice. Instead, individuals low in interdependence exhibit pain relief from instrumental choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashcroft, J. J., Leinster, S. J., & Slade, P. D. (1986). Mastectomy versus breast conservation: Psychological effects of patient choice of treatment. Psychosocial Issues in Malignant Disease, 16, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—The pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 780–781.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A., Fowler, S. L., Rasinski, H. M., Rose, J. P., & Geers, A. L. (2013). Choice as a moderator of placebo expectation effects: Additional support from two experiments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A., Oikawa, M., Rose, J. P., Haught, H., Oikawa, H., & Geers, A. L. (2015). Choosing across cultures: The effect of choice complexity on treatment outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 28, 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bry, C., Follenfant, A., & Meyer, T. (2008). Blonde like me: When self-construals moderate stereotype priming effects on intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 751–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chewning, B., Bylund, C. L., Shah, B., Arora, N. K., Gueguen, J. A., & Makoul, G. (2012). Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 86, 9–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, C., Dewey, M., Fielding, K., Gretton, V., Miller, P., Palmer, B., et al. (2001). Antidepressant drugs and generic counseling for treatment of major depression in primary care: Randomized trial with patient preference arms. BMJ, 322, 772–775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Fishbach, A. (2011). Choice as an end versus a means. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 544–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K. K., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). How will “I” versus “we” perform? An investigation of future outlooks and self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 947–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield, L. J., Hall, A., Maguire, G. P., & Baum, M. (1990). Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ, 301, 575–580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fallowfield, L. J., Hall, A., Maguire, P., Baum, M., & A’Hern, R. P. (1994). Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ, 309, 448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S. L., Rasinski, H. M., Helfer, S. G., Geers, A. L., & France, C. R. (2011). Concept priming and pain: An experimental approach to understanding the role of gender in sex-related pain differences. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 139–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A., & Rose, J. (2011). Treatment choice and placebo expectation effects. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 734–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. L., Rose, J. P., Fowler, S. L., Rasinski, H. M., Brown, J. A., & Helfer, S. G. (2013). Why does choice enhance treatment effectiveness? Using placebo treatments to demonstrate the role of personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 549–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. L., Rose, J. P., Rasinski, H. M., Fowler, S. L., & Brown, J. A. (2014). Patient involvement in treatment decision making can help or hinder placebo analgesia: The moderating role of prior experience. Zeitschriftfür Psychologie, 222, 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S., Kaplan, S. H., Ware, J. E., Yano, E. M., & Frank, H. J. (1988). Patients’ participation in medical care: Effects on blood sugar and quality of life in diabetes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 3, 448–457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R. W., & Biehal, G. J. (2005). Achieving your goals or protecting their future? The effects of self-view on goals and choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, E. E., Leong, F. T., & Osipow, S. H. (2001). Cultural relativity in the conceptualization of career maturity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Turisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafetsios, K., & Hess, U. (2013). Effects of activated and dispositional self-construal on emotion decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M., Wieczorkowska, G., Erb, H. P., & Burstein, E. (2002). Individualism, authoritarianism, and attitudes toward assisted death: Cross-cultural, cross-regional, and experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 60–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. Y., Aaker, W. L., & Gardner, W. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of Interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1122–1134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2012). The role of self-construal in consumers’ electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites: A social cognitive approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1054–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., Lin, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception. Biological Psychology, 77, 93–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Rau, P. P. (2014). Impact of self-construal on choice of enterprise social media for knowledge sharing. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 1077–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Hogan, D., Tan, L. S., Kaur, B., Ng, P. T., & Chan, M. (2014). Self-construal and students’ math self-concept, anxiety and achievement: An examination of achievement goals as mediators. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2004). Personality, self-esteem, and self-construal as correlates of forgivingness. European Journal of Personality, 18, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norasakkunkit, V., & Kalick, S. M. (2002). Culture, ethnicity, and emotional distress measures: The role of self-construal and self-enhancement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think: Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A. (2012). The motivational complexity of choosing: A review of theory and research. In R. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 249–279). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, R. J., & Neufeld, R. W. (1995). What are my options? Influences of choice availability on stress and the perception of control. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petterson, B., & Paterson, H. M. (2012). Culture and conformity: The effects of independent and interdependent self-construal on witness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöhlmann, C., Carranza, E., Hannover, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2007). Repercussions of self-construal for self-relevant and other-relevant choice. Social Cognition, 25, 284–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2011). After shock? Towards a social identity explanation of the Milgram ‘obedience’ studies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Ortiz, C. A. (1996). Patient-centered medicine. JAMA, 275, 1156–1166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Thomson, R. (2001). Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: Implication for the use of decision support tools. Quality in Health Care, 10, i34–i38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rokke, P. D., Al Absi, M., Lall, R., & Oswald, K. (1991). When does a choice of coping strategies help? The interaction of choice and locus of control. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 491–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rokke, P. D., & al’Absi, M. (1992). Matching pain coping strategies to the individual: A prospective validation of the cognitive coping strategy inventory. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 611–625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. P., Geers, A. L., Fowler, S. L., & Rasinski, H. M. (2013). Expectations and treatment positivity: How and when choosing shapes aversive experiences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. P., Geers, A. L., Rasinski, H. M., & Fowler, S. L. (2012). Treatment choice and pain analgesia. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 462–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L. (1983). Physician/patient communication: Transmission of information and patient effects. Maryland State Medical Journal, 32, 260–265.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savani, K., Markus, H. R., & Conner, A. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpacking culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., & Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Culture, self-construal and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 622–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. S., & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snibbe, A. C., & Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Weston, W. W., McWhinney, I. R., McWilliam, C. L., & Freeman, T. R. (2003). Patient-centered medicine: Transforming the clinical method (2nd ed.). Abingdon, England: Radcliffe Medical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. K., & Callahan, J. L. (2009). The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 368–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. K., Callahan, J. L., & Vollmer, B. M. (2011). Adapting psychotherapy to the individual patient: Preferences. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 155–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tafarodi, R. W., Milne, A. B., & Smith, A. J. (1999). The confidence of choice: Evidence for an augmentation effect on self-perceived performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1405–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, A., & Yamauchi, H. (2004). Cultural self-construal and achievement goal. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uskul, A. K., & Oyserman, D. (2010). When message-frame fits salient cultural-frame, messages feel more persuasive. Psychology and Health, 25, 321–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, B. A., Leonhart, R., & Helmes, A. W. (2009). Communication matters: The impact of communication and participation in decision making on breast cancer patients’ depression and quality of life. Patient Education and Counseling, 77, 391–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weger, U. W., & Loughnan, S. (2015). Using participant choice to enhance memory performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 345–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C. J. (2002). Taiwanese students’ gender, age, interdependent and independent self-construal, and collective self-esteem as predictors of professional psychological help-seeking attitudes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 19–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA

    Jacob Fox, Shane R. Close, Jason P. Rose & Andrew L. Geers

Authors
  1. Jacob Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shane R. Close
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason P. Rose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew L. Geers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew L. Geers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jacob Fox, Shane R. Close, Jason P. Rose, and Andrew L. Geers declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fox, J., Close, S.R., Rose, J.P. et al. Identifying when choice helps: clarifying the relationships between choice making, self-construal, and pain. J Behav Med 39, 527–536 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9708-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9708-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation