Marital quality, depressive symptoms, and the metabolic syndrome: a couples structural model
- 410 Downloads
The indirect association of marital quality with metabolic syndrome (MetS) through depressive symptoms was examined in 301 middle-aged and older couples. MetS components (i.e., waist circumference, blood pressure, blood draws to assess triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and fasting glucose) were assessed following a 12-h fast, and were treated as a continuous latent variable for analyses. In structural equation modeling of this indirect effect, overall model fit was good, and husbands’ and wives’ marital quality was associated with MetS only through depressive symptoms. Joint tests of the parameters indicated that gender did not moderate this association. The best fitting, most parsimonious model, after nested model comparisons, was one in which husbands’ and wives’ indirect paths were equated. Overall, marital quality was related to MetS through its relationship to depressive symptoms for men and women. Associations of marital quality and depression with MetS may overlap, and couple-based approaches to psychosocial risk factors for cardiovascular disease may be useful in future research.
KeywordsMetabolic syndrome Marital quality Depression
Supported by NIH Grant No. AG018903 awarded to Timothy W. Smith.
Conflict of interest
Nancy J.M. Henry, Timothy W. Smith, Jonathan Butner, Cynthia A. Berg, Kelsey K. Sewell, and Bert N. Uchino declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed Consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Utah Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Folkow, B. (1982). Physiological aspects of primary hypertension. Physiological Review, 62, 384–505.Google Scholar
- Grundy, S. M., Brewer, H. B., Cleeman, J. I., Smith, S. C., & Lenfant, C. (2004). Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation, 109, 433–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Macchia, A., Levantesi, G., Borrelli, G., et al. (2006). A clinically practicable diagnostic score for metabolic syndrome improves its predictivity of diabetes mellitus: The Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico (GISSI)-Prevenzione scoring. American Heart Journal, 151, e7–e17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Orth-Gomer, K., Wamala, S. P., Horsten, M., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., Schneiderman, N., & Mittleman, M. A. (2000). Marital stress worsens prognosis in women with coronary heart disease: The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 3008–3014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pladevall, M., Singal, B., William, L. K., Brotons, C., Guyer, H., Sadurni, J., … Haffner, S. (2006). A single factor underlies the metabolic syndrome: A confirmatory factor analysis. Diabetes Care, 29, 113–122.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., & Cundiff, J. M. (2011). An interpersonal perspective on risk for coronary heart disease. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 471–489). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W., Uchino, B. N., Berg, C. A., Florsheim, P., Pearce, G., Hawkins, M., & Yoon, H. C. (2007). Hostile personality traits and coronary artery calcification in middle-aged and older married couples: Different effects for self-reports versus spouse-ratings. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 441–448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Widaman, K. E., & Reise, S. P. (1995). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance abuse domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention. Methodoligical advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Yuan, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 167–202.Google Scholar