Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suppression of pain-related thoughts and feelings during pain-induction: sex differences in delayed pain responses

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women tend to report greater acute and chronic pain intensity than men, and various mechanisms have been proposed to account for these sex differences. Suppression has been related to amplified pain intensity, and thus we examined whether sex differences in the use of suppression partly explained the discrepancy between men and women on pain report. Participants (N = 222; women: 55%) underwent a cold pressor, during which half the sample was randomly assigned to suppress pain-related thoughts and feelings and the other half was not. A 2-min recovery period followed the cold pressor. Ten min later, all participants were exposed to another physical stimulus (a massage device). Significant condition × Sex interactions were found for pain intensity, sensory ratings from the McGill Pain Questionnaire and unpleasantness ratings for the massage device, such that: (a) men in the No Suppression condition reported lower pain and unpleasantness than women in the same condition; (b) men in Suppression condition reported greater pain and unpleasantness then men in No Suppression condition, but equivalent pain and unpleasantness to women in No Suppression condition; (c) differences between men and women on pain in No Suppression condition were partly mediated by women’s report of greater spontaneous use of avoidance/suppression during the cold pressor. Results using an “addition” paradigm (i.e., manipulating use of suppression) and a “take away” (i.e., mediation) paradigm converge to suggest that women spontaneously use suppression to regulate pain more than men, and that the differential use of suppression partly explains the tendency for women to report greater pain intensity than men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumberg, S. J. (2000). The white bear suppression inventory: Revisiting its factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. W. (2006). The role of attentional strategies in moderating links between acute pain induction and subsequent emotional stress: Evidence for symptom specific reactivity among chronic pain patients versus healthy nonpatients. Emotion, 6, 180–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. W., Quartana, P. J., & Bruehl, S. (2008). Anger inhibition and pain: Conceptualizations, evidence and new directions (invited). Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 259–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi, D., & Holloway, J. (1993). Delayed costs of suppressed pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 274–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. R., Fillingim, R. B., Maixner, W., Sigurdsson, A., & Haythornthwaite, J. (2004). Catastrophizing predicts changes in thermal pain responses after resolution of acute dental pain. The Journal of Pain, 5, 164–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elfant, E., Burns, J. W., & Zeichner, A. (2008). Repressive coping style and suppression of pain-related thoughts: Effects on responses to acute pain induction. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 671–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillingim, R. B., King, C. D., Ribeiro-Dasilva, M. C., Rahim-Williams, B., & Riley, J. L. (2009). Sex, gender, and pain: A review of recent clinical and experimental findings. Journal of Pain, 10, 447–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, B. R., McGuire, L., Allshouse, M., Stapleton, L., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Burns, N., et al. (2009). Associations between catastrophizing and endogenous pain-inhibitory processes: Sex differences. Journal of Pain, 10, 180–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, F. J., Lefebvre, J. C., Egert, J. R., Affleck, G., Sullivan, M. J., & Caldwell, D. S. (2000). The relationship of gender to pain, pain behavior and disability in osteoarthritis patients: The role of catastrophizing. Pain, 87, 325–334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, E., & Denford, S. (2009). Sex differences in perceptions of pain coping strategy usage. European Journal of Pain, 13, 629–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, E., Hatton, K., & Ellery, D. (2000). Avoidance versus focused attention and the perception of pain: Differential effects for men and women. Pain, 85, 225–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masedo, A. I., & Esteve, M. R. (2007). Effects of suppression, acceptance, and spontaneous coping on pain tolerance, pain intensity and distress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 199–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. (1987). The short-form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain, 30, 191–197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ninot, G., Fortes, M., Poulain, M., Brun, A., Desplan, J., Prefaut, C., et al. (2006). Gender differences in coping strategies among patients enrolled in an inpatient rehabilitation program. Heart and Lung, 35, 130–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Larson, J., & Grayson, C. (1999). Explaining the gender difference in depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1061–1072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. D., Newton, C. R., Rosen, K. H., & Skaggs, G. E. (2006). Gender differences in how men and women who are referred for IVF cope with infertility stress. Human Reproduction, 21, 2443–2449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud, M., Dugas, M. J., & Conway, M. (2003). Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral variables. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17, 501–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. E., Riley, J. L., Myers, C. D., Papas, R. K., Wise, E. A., Waxenberg, L. B., et al. (2001). Gender role expectations of pain: Relationship to sex differences in pain. Journal of Pain, 2, 251–257.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. J. L., Rouse, D., Bishop, S., & Johnston, S. (1997). Thought suppression, atastrophization, and pain. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, B. E., Clements, K. L., Ward, L. C., Dixon, K. E., Kersh, B. C., Boothby, J. L., et al. (2004). Personality factors in the explanation of sex differences in pain catastrophizing and response to experimental pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20, 275–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Cheng, Y., Liu, T., Li, Q., Fillingim, R. B., Wallace, M. R., et al. (2008). A computational model for sex-specific genetic architecture of complex traits in humans: Implications for mapping pain sensitivity. Molecular Pain, 16, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzlaff, R. M., & Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 59–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z. (2005). Sex differences in pain perception. Gender Medicine, 2, 137–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by grant R01-MH071260 from the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Burns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, J.W., Elfant, E. & Quartana, P.J. Suppression of pain-related thoughts and feelings during pain-induction: sex differences in delayed pain responses. J Behav Med 33, 200–208 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9248-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9248-x

Keywords

Navigation