The current study investigates the effects of a fact family fluency intervention on math facts fluency and quantitative reasoning. Sixty-three students in Grades 5–8 participated in the study, including 14 students receiving special education services and 15 students receiving additional support. The researchers employed a quasi-experimental, switching replications design that included three waves of assessment. The first group to receive intervention achieved statistically significant gains in performance on both math facts fluency and quantitative reasoning. The second group then received intervention and demonstrated a similar performance. Implications of the current findings and potential directions for future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Alekseyenko, A. V. (2016). Multivariate Welch t-test on distances. Bioinformatics, 32, 3552–3558. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw524.
Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. (2011). Refueling the U.S. innovation economy: Fresh approaches to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education (pp. 1–178). Washington, DC: The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (1991). Lifetime maintenance of high school mathematics content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 20.
Baroody, A. (2006). Why children have difficulties mastering the basic number combinations and how to help them. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13, 22–31.
Baroody, A. J., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Young children’s understanding and application of subtractionrelated principles: Introduction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802583873.
Beirne-Smith, M. (1991). Peer tutoring in arithmetic for children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 330–337.
Biancarosa, G., & Shanley, L. (2016). What is fluency? The fluency construct (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Springer.
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
Boaler, J. (2015). Fluency without fear: Research evidence on the best ways to learn math facts. Retrieved from https://www.youcubed.org/.
Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 42, 189–201.
Brady, K. K., & Kubina, R. M. (2010). Endurance of multiplication fact fluency for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification, 34, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445510361331.
Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., & Chavez, M. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932507309712.
Bullara, D. T., Kimball, J. W., & Cooper, J. O. (1993). An assessment of beginning addition skills following three months without instruction or practice. Journal of Precision Teaching, 11, 11–16.
Burnett, P. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students’ perceptions of the classroom environment. Educational psychology, 22, 5–16.
Burns, M. K., Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, P. M., & Kanive, R. (2015). Number of repetitions required to retain single-digit multiplication math facts for elementary students. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 398.
Canobi, K. H. (2005). Children’s profiles of addition and subtraction understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.001.
Chiesa, M., & Robertson, A. (2000). Precision teaching and fluency training: Making maths easier for pupils and teachers. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360020006372.
Cirino, P. T., Tolar, T. D., Fuchs, L. S., & Huston-Warren, E. (2016). Cognitive and numerosity predictors of mathematical skills in middle school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 145, 95–119.
Clarke, B., Nelson, N., & Shanley, L. (2016). Mathematics fluency—More than the weekly timed test. In K. D. Cummings & Y. M. Petscher (Eds.), The fluency construct (pp. 67–89). New York, NY: Springer.
Codding, R. S., Burns, M. K., & Lukito, G. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic-fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x.
Codding, R. S., Chan-Iannetta, L., Palmer, M., & Lukito, G. (2009). Examining a classwide application of cover–copy–compare with and without goal setting to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 173–185.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Cook, B. G., & Cook, S. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911420877.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Daly, E. J., III., Martens, B. K., Barnett, D., Witt, J. C., & Olson, S. C. (2007). Varying intervention delivery in response to intervention: Confronting and resolving challenges with measurement, instruction, and intensity. School Psychology Review, 36, 562–581.
Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (2004). Learning and complex behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dowker, A. (2003). Young children’s estimates for addition: The zone of partial knowledge and understanding. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 243–265). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2013). An applied reference guide to research designs. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 467–475.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Stuebing, K., Fletcher, J. M., Hamlett, C. L., & Lambert, W. (2008a). Problem solving and computational skill: Are they shared or distinct aspects of mathematical cognition? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 30.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 85–95.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Malone, A. S. (2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50, 35–43.
Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Powell, S. R., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008b). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third- grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173.
Geary, D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469398.
Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/.
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.
Gilmore, C. K., & Papadatou-Pastou, M. (2009). Patterns of individual differences in conceptual understanding and arithmetical skill: A meta-analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 25–40.
Greene, I., McTiernan, A. M., & Holloway, J. (2018). Cross-age peer tutoring and fluency-based instruction to achieve fluency with mathematics computation skills: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(2), 145–171.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
Hecht, S. A., Close, L., & Santisi, M. (2003). Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 277–302.
Hoffer, T. B., Venkataraman, L., Hedberg, E. C., & Shagle, S. (2007). Final report on the national survey of algebra teachers for the National Math Panel. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
Jan, S., & Shieh, G. (2014). Sample size determinations for Welch’s test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12006.
Johnson, K. (2008). Morningside mathematics fluency: Math facts (Vols. 1–6; curriculum program). Seattle, WA: Morningside Press.
Johnson, E. S., Carter, D. R., & Pool, J. L. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: The critical role of a strong tier 2 system. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48, 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212462877.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281–288.
Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (2009). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 82–88.
Jordan, N. C., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 103–119.
Jordan, N. C., Hansen, N., Fuchs, L. S., Siegler, R. S., Gersten, R., & Micklos, D. (2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 45–58.
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Oláh, L., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175.
Kostewicz, D. E., King, S. A., Datchuk, S. M., Brennan, K. M., & Casey, S. D. (2016). Data collection and measurement assessment in behavioral research: 1958–2013. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 16, 19–33.
Kubina, R. M., & Yurich, K. K. L. (2012). Precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.
Lee, D. L. (2006). Facilitating academic transitions: An application of behavioral momentum. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 312–317.
Lin, F. Y., & Kubina, R. M. (2005). A preliminary investigation of the relationship between fluency and application for multiplication. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 73–87.
Long, A. C. J., Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., Collier-Meek, M., Gallucci, J., Altschaefl, M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2016). An exploratory investigation of teachers’ intervention planning and perceived implementation barriers. Journal of School Psychology, 55, 1–26.
McTiernan, A., Holloway, J., Healy, O., & Hogan, M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of the Morningside math facts curriculum on fluency, stability, endurance, and application outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9227y.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2018). Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2015). Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
National Research Council & Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Phillips, G. W. (2007). Chance favors the prepared mind: Mathematics and science indicators for comparing states and nations. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & O’Mara, T. (2006). Detect, practice, and repair: The effects of a classwide intervention on elementary students’ math-fact fluency. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 7, 47–68.
Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Early numerical competencies and students with mathematics difficulty. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1–16.
Price, G. R., & Ansari, D. (2013). Dyscalculia: Characteristics, causes, and treatments. Numeracy, 6(2), 1–16.
Rivera, D. M., & Bryant, B. R. (1992). Mathematics instruction for students with special needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129202800203.
Ruxton, G. D. (2006). The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 688–690.
Schrank, F. A., Stephens-Pisecco, T. L., & Schultz, E. K. (2017). The WJ IV core selective evaluation process applied to identification of a specific learning disability (Woodcock-Johnson IV Assessment Service Bulletin No. 8). Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146.
Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). A model of strategy choice. In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origin of cognitive skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
Skinner, C. H. (2010). Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 166–172.
Stocker, J. D., & Kubina, R. M. (2017). Impact of cover, copy, and compare on fluency outcomes for students with disabilities and math deficits: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61(1), 56–68.
Stocker, J. D., Jr., Kubina, R. M., Jr., Riccomini, P. J., & Mason, A. (2018a). Comparing the effects of different timings to build computational and procedural fluency with complex computations. Journal of Evidence Based Practices in Schools, 16, 206–219.
Stocker, J. D., Jr., Schwartz, R., Kubina, R. M., Jr., Kostewicz, D., & Kozloff, M. (2018b). Behavioral fluency and mathematics intervention research: A review of the last 20 years. Behavioral Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1649.
Stromgren, B., Berg-Mortensen, C., & Tangen, L. (2014). The use of precision teaching to teach basic math facts. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 15, 225–240.
Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The Condition of Education 2007 (NCES 2007–064). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Witzel, B. S., & Riccomini, P. J. (2007). Optimizing math curriculum to meet the learning needs of students. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.1.13-18.
Woodward, J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 269–289.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Stocker, J.D., Hughes, E.M., Wiesner, A. et al. Investigating the Effects of a Fact Family Fluency Intervention on Math Facts Fluency and Quantitative Reasoning. J Behav Educ (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09422-1
- Math facts fluency
- Fact family fluency
- Mathematics interventions
- Quantitative reasoning
- Number sense