Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 88–111 | Cite as

Classwide Teacher Implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Writing with Students with E/BD in a Residential Facility

  • Robin Parks Ennis
  • Kristine Jolivette
  • Nicole Patton Terry
  • Laura D. Fredrick
  • Paul A. Alberto
Original Paper


One promising intervention to support the writing skills of students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders is self-regulated strategy development (SRSD). The purpose of this study was to extend this line of inquiry to a residential setting with teachers serving as interventionists and determine the effects of the SRSD using the STOP and DARE mnemonic for persuasive writing on the writing performance (Correct Word Sequences, Essay Elements, and Essay Quality), and academic engagement of secondary students. In addition, this study extended this line of inquiry by looking at implementation of the intervention only 2 days per week, a lower treatment intensity than previous research has used to find statistically significant gains in writing. Results of a piecewise hierarchical linear model suggest statistically significant gains were made over the course of the intervention in writing and academic engagement when compared to baseline. In addition, student variables such as writing achievement, externalizing/internalizing behavior patterns, age, and attendance predicted writing and engagement. Results of generalization, fidelity, and social validity also are reported.


Emotional and behavioral disorders E/BD Self-regulated strategy development SRSD Writing 


  1. Chalk, J. C., Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M. D. (2005). The effects of self-regulated strategy development on the writing process for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from
  3. Cuenca-Sanchez, Y., Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Kidd, J. K. (2012). Teaching students with emotional and behavioral disorders to self-advocate through persuasive writing. Exceptionality, 20, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ennis, R. P. (2014). Simultaneously addressing academic and behavioral needs of students with and at-risk for E/BD using self-regulated strategy development. Beyond Behavior. Google Scholar
  6. Ennis, R. P., & Jolivette, K. (2014). Existing research and future directions for self-regulated strategy development with students with and at-risk for E/BD. Journal of Special Education, 48, 32–45.Google Scholar
  7. Ennis, R. P., Jolivette, K., & Boden, L. J. (2013). STOP and DARE: Self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing with elementary students with E/BD in a residential facility. Education and Treatment of Children, 36, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagaman, J. L., Trout, A. L., Chmelka, M. B., Thompson, R. W., & Reid, R. (2010). Risk profile of children entering residential care: A cluster analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.Google Scholar
  12. Horner, R. H., Todd, A. W., Lewis-Palmer, T. L., Irvin, L. K., Sugai, G., & Boland, J. B. (2004). The School-Wide Evaluation Tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. (2007). The ABC’s of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Institute of Education Sciences. (2007). The nation’s report card: Writing 2007. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved September 27, 2011, from
  15. Jolivette, K., Patterson, D. P., Swoszowski, N. C., McDaniel, S. C., Kennedy, C., & Ennis, R. P. (2014). SWPBIS in a residential school for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: First years of implementation and maintenance follow-up focus group. Residential Treatment of Children and Youth, 31, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiuhara, S. A., O’Neill, R. E., Hawken, L. S., & Graham, S. (2012). The effectiveness of teaching 10th-grade students STOP, AIMS, and DARE for planning and drafting persuasive text. Exceptional Children, 78, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lane, K. L., Wehby, J. H., Robertson, J., & Rogers, L. A. (2007). How do different types of high school students respond to schoolwide positive behavior support programs? Characteristics and responsiveness of teacher-identified students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mason, L. H., Kubina, R. M., & Hoover, T. (2011). Effects of quick writing instruction for high school students with emotional disturbances. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,. doi: 10.1177/1063426611410429.Google Scholar
  19. Mason, L. H., Kubina, R. M., Valasa, L. L., & Cramer, A. M. (2010). Evaluating effective writing instruction for adolescent students in an emotional and behavior support setting. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 140–156.Google Scholar
  20. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Cerar, N. I., Allen-Bronaugh, D., Thompson, M., Guckert, M., et al. (2012). Fluent persuasive writing with counterarguments for students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Special Education,. doi: 10.1177/0022466912440456.Google Scholar
  21. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Mills, S., Cerar, N. I., Cuenca-Sanchez, Y., Allen-Brounaugh, D., et al. (2009). Persuading students with emotional disabilities to write fluently. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 19–40.Google Scholar
  22. Mooney, P., Ryan, J. B., Uhing, B. M., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. H. (2005). A review of self-management interventions targeting academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Commission on Writing. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved September 27, 2011, from
  24. Nelson, J. R., Benner, G. J., Lane, K., & Smith, S. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2010). Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM7 programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  26. Simonsen, B., Britton, L., & Young, D. (2010). School-wide positive behavior support in an alternative school setting: A case study. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 12, 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tobin, T. J., & Sprague, J. R. (2000). Alternative education strategies: Reducing violence in school and community. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trout, A. L., Nordness, P. D., Pierce, C. D., & Epstein, M. H. (2003). Research on the academic status of children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review of the literature from 1961 to 2000. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wagner, M., Friend, M., Bursuck, W. D., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Sumi, W. C., et al. (2006). Educating students with emotional disturbances: A National perspective on school programs and services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Epstein, M. H., & Sumi, W. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders: User’s guide and technical manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  33. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Parks Ennis
    • 1
  • Kristine Jolivette
    • 2
  • Nicole Patton Terry
    • 2
  • Laura D. Fredrick
    • 2
  • Paul A. Alberto
    • 2
  1. 1.Special Education Program, Department of Teacher EducationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations