Classwide Teacher Implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Writing with Students with E/BD in a Residential Facility
- 551 Downloads
One promising intervention to support the writing skills of students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders is self-regulated strategy development (SRSD). The purpose of this study was to extend this line of inquiry to a residential setting with teachers serving as interventionists and determine the effects of the SRSD using the STOP and DARE mnemonic for persuasive writing on the writing performance (Correct Word Sequences, Essay Elements, and Essay Quality), and academic engagement of secondary students. In addition, this study extended this line of inquiry by looking at implementation of the intervention only 2 days per week, a lower treatment intensity than previous research has used to find statistically significant gains in writing. Results of a piecewise hierarchical linear model suggest statistically significant gains were made over the course of the intervention in writing and academic engagement when compared to baseline. In addition, student variables such as writing achievement, externalizing/internalizing behavior patterns, age, and attendance predicted writing and engagement. Results of generalization, fidelity, and social validity also are reported.
KeywordsEmotional and behavioral disorders E/BD Self-regulated strategy development SRSD Writing
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org.
- Ennis, R. P. (2014). Simultaneously addressing academic and behavioral needs of students with and at-risk for E/BD using self-regulated strategy development. Beyond Behavior. Google Scholar
- Ennis, R. P., & Jolivette, K. (2014). Existing research and future directions for self-regulated strategy development with students with and at-risk for E/BD. Journal of Special Education, 48, 32–45.Google Scholar
- Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.Google Scholar
- Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.Google Scholar
- Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. (2007). The ABC’s of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Institute of Education Sciences. (2007). The nation’s report card: Writing 2007. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved September 27, 2011, from http://nationsreportcard.gov/writing_2007/w0001.asp.
- Jolivette, K., Patterson, D. P., Swoszowski, N. C., McDaniel, S. C., Kennedy, C., & Ennis, R. P. (2014). SWPBIS in a residential school for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: First years of implementation and maintenance follow-up focus group. Residential Treatment of Children and Youth, 31, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lane, K. L., Wehby, J. H., Robertson, J., & Rogers, L. A. (2007). How do different types of high school students respond to schoolwide positive behavior support programs? Characteristics and responsiveness of teacher-identified students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mason, L. H., Kubina, R. M., Valasa, L. L., & Cramer, A. M. (2010). Evaluating effective writing instruction for adolescent students in an emotional and behavior support setting. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 140–156.Google Scholar
- Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Mills, S., Cerar, N. I., Cuenca-Sanchez, Y., Allen-Brounaugh, D., et al. (2009). Persuading students with emotional disabilities to write fluently. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 19–40.Google Scholar
- National Commission on Writing. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved September 27, 2011, from http://www.writingcommission.org/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-ticket-towork.pdf.
- Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2010). Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM7 programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Epstein, M. H., & Sumi, W. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders: User’s guide and technical manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
- Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar