Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Effects of Fluency Versus Accuracy Training on Endurance and Retention of Assembly Tasks by Four Adolescents with Developmental Disabilities

  • Gabrielle T. Lee
  • Jessica Singer-Dudek
Original Paper

Abstract

Schools are increasingly being encouraged to teach vocational skills to middle and high school students. Although extensive research exists demonstrating the benefits of fluency instruction when teaching academic skills to this population of students, few studies have examined the importance of fluency training when teaching vocational skills. Using an alternating treatments design, the present study examined the effects of fluency versus accuracy training on 4 students’ fluency in completing 2 vocational tasks. Following the training phase, students completed each task during 20- and 40-min work sessions to assess endurance and retention of the trained skills. Overall, results suggest that the fluency condition produced greater work productivity.

Keywords

Fluency Accuracy Rate criterion Endurance Retention Vocational skills 

References

  1. Ardoin, S. P., McCall, M., & Klubnik, C. (2007). Promoting generalization of oral reading fluency: Providing drill versus practice opportunities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 55–70.Google Scholar
  2. Binder, C. (1988). Precision teaching: Measuring and attaining exemplary academic achievement. Youth Policy, 10, 12–15.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.Google Scholar
  4. Binder, C., & Bloom, C. (1989). Fluent product knowledge: Application in the financial services industry. Performance and Instruction, 28(2), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binder, C., Haughton, E., & Van Eyck, D. (1990). Increasing endurance by building fluency. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 24–27.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, B. (1986). Automaticity: The hands and feet of genius. Educational Leadership, 43, 70–77.Google Scholar
  7. Brady, K. K., & Kubina, R. M., Jr. (2010). Endurance of multiplication fact fluency for students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification, 34(2), 79–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, L., Bellamy, T., Perlmutter, L., Sackowitz, P., & Sontag, E. (1972). The development of quality, quantity, and durability in the work performance of retarded students in a public school prevocational workshop. Training School Bulletin, 68, 58–69.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L., & Pearce, E. (1970). Increasing the production rates of trainable retarded students in public school simulated workshop. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 5, 15–22.Google Scholar
  10. Cuvo, A. J., Leaf, R. B., & Borakove, L. S. (1978). Teaching janitorial skills to the mentally retarded: Acquisition, generalization, and maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 345–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Day, H. M., & Horner, R. H. (1989). Building response classes: A comparison of two procedures for teaching generalized pouring to learners with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 223–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duhon, G. J., House, S. E., Poncy, B. C., Hastings, K. W., & McClurg, S. C. (2010). An examination of two techniques for promoting response generalization of early literacy skills. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edmark reading program (2nd ed.). Redmon, WA: Riverdeep Interactive Learning Limited, 1992.Google Scholar
  14. Gold, M. W. (1972). Stimulus factors in skill training of the retarded on a complex assembly task: Acquisition, transfer, and retention. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 517–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivarie, J. J. (1986). Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of a recall and writing behavior. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1994). The Morningside model of generative instruction. In I. R. Gardner, et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Pacific Groves, CA: Brooks\Cole.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, R. L. (1996). A functional analysis of the effects of mastery and fluency on maintenance (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University). Abstract from: UMI Proquest Digital Dissertations [on-line]. Dissertations Abstracts Item: 9616720.Google Scholar
  19. Larson, N. (1994). Saxon math. Norman, OK: Saxon Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Lattimore, L. P., Parsons, M. B., & Reid, D. H. (2006). Enhancing job-site training of supported workers with autism: A reemphasis on simulation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 91–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindsley, O. R. (1992). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 51–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsico, M. J. (1998). Textual stimulus control of independent math performance and generalization to reading (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University). Abstract from: UMI Proquest Digital Dissertations [on-line]. Dissertations Abstracts Item: AAT 982222.Google Scholar
  23. McCurdy, M., Daly, E., Gortmaker, V., Bonfiglio, C., & Persampieri, M. (2007). Use of brief instruction trials to identify small group reading strategies: A two experiment study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDowell, C., & Keenan, M. (2001). Developing fluency and endurance in a child diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 345–348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Montarello, S., & Martens, B. (2005). Effects of interspersed brief problems on students’ endurance at completing math work. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roessler, R. T., & Foshee, K. (2010). Impact of occupational instruction on the performance and vocational identity of special education students. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 29(3), 23–28.Google Scholar
  27. Rusch, F. R., & Hughes, C. (1989). Overview of supported employment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 351–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rusch, F. R., Hughes, C., Agran, M., Martin, J. E., & Johnson, J. R. (2009). Toward self-directed learning, post-high school placement, and coordinated support: Constructing new transition bridges to adult life. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 1–7.Google Scholar
  29. Sabbatino, E. D., & Macrine, S. L. (2007). Start on success: A model transition program for high school students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 52, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singer-Dudek, J., & Greer, R. D. (2005). A long term analysis of the relationship between fluency and the training and maintenance of complex math skills. The Psychological Record, 55, 361–376.Google Scholar
  31. Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1984). The effects of single instance, multiple instance and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 273–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Houten, R. (1980). Learning through feedback: A systematic approach for improving academic performance. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wacker, D., & Berg, W. (1983). Effects of picture prompts on the acquisition of complex vocational tasks by mentally retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 417–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Young, K. R., West, R. P., Howard, V. F., & Whitney, R. (1986). Acquisition, fluency training, generalization, and maintenance of dressing skills of two developmentally disabled children. Education and Treatment of Children, 9, 16–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programs in Applied Behavior Analysis, Department of Health and Behavior StudiesTeachers College, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations