Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 200–219 | Cite as

A Comparison of Functional Behavior Assessment Methodologies with Young Children: Descriptive Methods and Functional Analysis

  • Peter J. Alter
  • Maureen A. Conroy
  • G. Rich Mancil
  • Todd Haydon
Original Paper


The use of functional behavior assessment (FBA) to guide the development of behavior intervention plans continues to increase since they were first mandated in IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. Section 1400 et seq, 1997). A variety of indirect and direct instruments have been developed to facilitate this process. Although many researchers believe that a full functional analysis is necessary to identify the function of a behavior, more rapid and efficient FBA procedures are more commonly used. This investigation examined the correspondence between indirect and direct FBA procedures. Specifically, the results of three descriptive assessments and a functional analysis for four young children at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders were compared. Separation of all descriptive and experimental results was maintained and the assessment order was counterbalanced. Results of the descriptive assessments had low consistency with each other, and the results of two indirect FBA assessments (the Functional Assessment Interview and Motivation Assessment Scale) had low agreement with the results of functional analyses. On the other hand, the direct assessment procedure (ABC assessment) agreed with the results of functional analyses for all participants. These results support the use of direct observations and indicate that indirect measures should be used with caution as stand-alone assessments of the function of challenging behaviors.


Functional behavior assessment Descriptive assessments Functional analysis Young children Emotional and behavioral disorders 


  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: Research Center for Children, Youth & Families, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: Research Center for Children, Youth & Families, University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  3. Arndorfer, R. E., Miltenberger, R. G., Woster, S. H., Rortvedt, A. K., & Gaffaney, T. (1994). Home-based descriptive and experimental analysis of problem behaviors in children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 64–88.Google Scholar
  4. Association for Positive Behavior Support (n.d.) Retrieved October, 2006 from
  5. Barton-Arwood, S. M., Wehby, J. H., Gunter, P. L., & Lane, K. (2003). Functional behavior rating scales: Interrater reliability with students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 386–400.Google Scholar
  6. Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 175–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair, K. C., Umbreit, J., & Bos, C. S. (1999). Using functional assessment and children’s preferences to improve the behavior of young children with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 151–166.Google Scholar
  8. Calloway, C. J., & Simpson, R. L. (1998). Decisions regarding functions of behavior: Scientific versus informal analysis. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 167–176.Google Scholar
  9. Chandler, L. K., Dahlquist, C. M., Repp, A. C., & Feltz, C. (1999). The effects of team-based functional assessment on the behavior of students in classroom settings. Exceptional Children, 66, 101–129.Google Scholar
  10. Conroy, M. A., Fox, J. J., Bucklin, A., & Good, W. (1996). An analysis of the reliability and stability of the motivation assessment scale in assessing the challenging behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 243–250.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, E., & O’Neill, R. E. (2000). A comparison of results of functional assessment and analysis methods with young children with autism. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 406–414.Google Scholar
  13. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988). Identifying variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1992). The motivation assessment scale (MAS) administration guide. Topeka, KS: Monaco.Google Scholar
  15. Ellingson, S. A., Miltenberger, R. G., Stricker, J., Galensky, T. L., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Functional assessment and intervention for challenging behaviors in the classroom by general classroom teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Floyd, R. G., Phaneuf, R. L., & Wilczynski, S. M. (2005). Measurement properties of indirect assessment methods for functional behavioral assessment: A review of research. School Psychology Review, 34, 58–73.Google Scholar
  17. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. Section 1400 et seq. (1997).Google Scholar
  19. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004, 11 Stat. 37 U.S.C. Section 1401 (2004).Google Scholar
  20. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from analysis and intervention in developmental disabilities, 2, 3–30).Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, S. S., & O’Neill R. E. (2001). Searching for effectiveness and efficiency in conducting functional assessments: A review and proposed process for teachers and other practitioners. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lerman, D. C., & Iwata, B. A. (1993). Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 293–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murdock, S. G., O’Neill, R. E., & Cunningham, E. (2005). A comparison of functional behavioral assessment procedures with a group of middle school students with emotional/ behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newcomer, L. L., & Lewis, T. J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 168–181.Google Scholar
  25. O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.Google Scholar
  26. Sasso, G. M., Conroy, M. A., Stichter, J., & Fox, J. J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional assessment for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 282–296.Google Scholar
  27. Sasso, G. M., Reimers, T. M., Cooper, L. J., Wacker, D., Berg, W., Steege, M., Kelly, L., & Allaire, A. (1992). Use of descriptive and experimental analysis to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 809–821.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schill, M. T., Kratochowill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1998). Functional assessment in behavioral consultation: A treatment utility study. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 116–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, T. M., Bucalos, A., Liaupsin, C., Nelson, C. M., Jolivette, K., & Deshea, L. (2004). Using functional behavior assessment in general education settings: Making a case for effectiveness and efficiency. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 300–323.Google Scholar
  30. Shores, R. E., Wehby, J. H., & Jack, S. L. (1999). Analyzing behavior disorders in classrooms. In A. C. Repp & Horner, R. H. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 219–237). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  31. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (1999). Functional assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 253–257.Google Scholar
  32. Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 343–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Umbreit, J., Ferro, J. B., Liaupsin, C. J., & Lane, K. L. (2007). Functional behavioral assessment and function-based intervention. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  34. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gatti, S. (2001). Descriptive assessment method to reduce overall disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom. School Psychology Review, 30, 548–567.Google Scholar
  35. Webster-Stratton, C. (1997). Early intervention for families of preschool children with conduct problems. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The effectiveness of early intervention (pp. 429–454). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Yarbrough, S. C., & Carr, E. G. (2000). Some relationships between informant assessment and functional analysis of problem behavior. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 105, 130–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Alter
    • 1
  • Maureen A. Conroy
    • 2
  • G. Rich Mancil
    • 3
  • Todd Haydon
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Teaching and Learning, College of Education and Human DevelopmentUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  4. 4.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations