Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 128–143 | Cite as

Would We Recognize Progress if We Saw it? A Commentary

Original Paper


Comments on the nature of special education as an enterprise and judgment of its progress are offered. Five independent but necessary and sufficient criteria for judgment of progress in special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders are suggested. Comments are made on each of the articles in the series, and concluding remarks call for more data and better thinking.


Emotional and behavioral disorders Behavior problems 


  1. Brantlinger E. A. (Ed.). (2006). Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people’s children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  3. Cook B. G., & Schirmer B. R. (Eds.). (2006). What is special about special education? Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  4. Cottle, M. (2001). Reform school. The New Republic, 244, 14–15.Google Scholar
  5. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn, L. M. (1969). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justified? Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, M. (2001, December 13). Students still taking the fall for D.C. schools. The Washington Post, Metro B1, B4.Google Scholar
  8. Flannery, T. (2005). The weather Makers: How man is changing the climate and what it means for life on earth. New York: Atlantic Monthly Books.Google Scholar
  9. Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Education Review, 57, 367–395.Google Scholar
  10. Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1989). The yoke of special education: How to break it. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.Google Scholar
  11. Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2009). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (11th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  12. Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race & disability in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2007). Discarding the deficit model. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 16–21.Google Scholar
  14. Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single-case experimental designs: Stragegies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Heward, W. L., & Silvestri, S. M. (2005). The neutralization of special education. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice (pp. 193–214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Jarvis, E. (1852). On the supposed increase in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 8, 333–364.Google Scholar
  17. Kauffman, J. M. (1981). Introduction: Historical trends and contemporary issues in special education in the United States. In J. M. Kauffman, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 3–23). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Kauffman, J. M. (2005). Waving to Ray Charles: Missing the meaning of disability. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 520–521, 524.Google Scholar
  19. Kauffman, J. M. (in press). Special education. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21st Century education: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Kauffman, J. M., Bantz, J., & McCullough, J. (2002). Separate and better: A special public school class for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 10, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kauffman, J. M., & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Special education: What it is and why we need it. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  22. Kauffman, J. M., & Konold, T. R. (2007). Making sense in education: Pretense (including NCLB) and realities in rhetoric and policy about schools and schooling. Exceptionality, 15, 75–96.Google Scholar
  23. Kauffman, J. M., & Konold, T. R. (in press). The No Child Left Behind Act: Making decisions without data or other reality checks. In T. Kowalski & T. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making for education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2006). Children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: A history of their education. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  25. Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2007). Educational service interventions and reforms. In J. W. Jacobson, & J. Rojahn (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 173–188). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Kauffman J. M., & Lopes. J. A. (Eds.). (2007). Pode a educação especial deixar de ser especial? (Can Special Education give up being special? Braga, Portugal: Psiquilíbrios EdiçÕes.Google Scholar
  28. Kauffman, J. M., Mock, D. R., & Simpson, R. L. (in press). Problems related to underservice of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders.Google Scholar
  29. Kauffman, J. M., Mock, D. R., Tankersley, M., & Landrum, T. J. (2008). Effective service delivery models. In R. J. Morris, &N. Mather (Eds.), Evidence-based interventions for students with learning and behavioral challenges (pp. 359–378). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Landsman, J. (2001). A white teacher talks about race. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
  31. Lipsky, D. K, & Gartner, A. (1996). Inclusion, school restructuring, and the remaking of American society. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 762–796.Google Scholar
  32. Mann, L. (1979). On the trail of process: A historical perspective on cognitive processes and their training. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  33. Pullen, P. L. (2005). Brighter beginnings for teachers. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  34. Reynolds, M. C. (1989). A historical perspective: The delivery of special education to mildly disabled and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 10(6), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Satel, S. (2007, September 13). Mind over manual. The New York Times, A23.Google Scholar
  36. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Singh, & A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 225–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
  37. Stribling, F. T. (1842). Physician and superintendent’s report. In Annual Reports to the Court of Directors of the Western Lunatic Asylum to the Legislature of Virginia (pp. 1–70). Richmond, VA: Shepherd & Conlin.Google Scholar
  38. Vonnegut, K. (2005). A man without a country. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, H. M. (2003, February 20). Comments on accepting the Outstanding Leadership Award from the Midwest Symposium for Leadership in Behavior Disorders. Kansas City, KS: Author.Google Scholar
  40. Warnock, M. (2005). Special educational needs: A new look. Impact No. 11. London: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.Google Scholar
  41. Worth, R. (1999). The scandal of special ed: It wastes money and hurts the poor. The Washington Monthly, 31(6), 34–38.Google Scholar
  42. Zigmond, N. (1997). Educating students with disabilities: The future of special education. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 377–390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Zigmond, N. (2003). Where should students with disabilities receive special education services? Is one place better than another?. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 193–199.Google Scholar
  44. Zigmond, N. (2007). Delivering special education is a two-person job: A call for unconventional thinking. In J. B. Crockett, M. M. Gerber, & T. J. Landrum (Eds.), Achieving the radical reform of special education: Essays in honor of James M. Kauffman (pp. 115–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations