Journal of Behavioral Education

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 19–34 | Cite as

Using Structural Analysis in Natural Settings: A Responsive Functional Assessment Strategy

  • Janine Peck Stichter
  • Maureen A. Conroy


Since the reauthorization of IDEA (1997), the use of functional assessments to examine factors that are related to students’ challenging behaviors has gained increasing attention in the literature. Over the past five years, several groups of investigators have conducted systematic analyses of the current status of the use of functional assessment in relation to students with or at risk for emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD). Their findings outline a number of critical, applied research issues for the field to consider. The purpose of this paper is to respond to a number of these issues by highlighting the relevance of structural analysis in addition to and in some cases in lieu of more traditional functional assessments. A brief review of current trends in the functional assessment research is presented as well as a rational for the use of structural analysis to examine the occurrence of appropriate behavior for students with EBD. Finally, illustrations of studies conducting structural analyses in classrooms settings are provided.

Key Words

structural analysis functional assessment emotional behavioral disorders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axelrod, S. (1987). Functional and structural analysis of behavior: Approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calloway, C., & Simpson, R. (1998). Decisions regarding functions of behavior: Scientific versus informal analyses. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 167–175.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, E. G. (1994). Emerging themes in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393–399.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, E. G., & Carlson, Jane, I. (1993). Reduction of Severe Behavior Problems in the Community Using a Multicomponent Treatment Approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 157–172.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 111–126.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, E. G., Yarbrough, S. C., & Langdon, N. A. (1997). Effects of idiosyncratic stimulus variables on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 673–686.Google Scholar
  7. Conroy, M., Fox, J., Crain, L., Jenkins, A., & Belcher, K. (1996). Evaluating the social and ecological validity of analog assessment procedures for challenging behaviors in young children. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 232–256.Google Scholar
  8. Conroy, M. A., Fullerton, E. K., Beaunae, C., Alter, P., Payne, L., & Scott, T. (2004). The EASY Checklist: A tool for evaluating contexts in early childhood settings. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Conroy, M. A., Clark, D., Fox, J. J., & Gable, R. A. (2000). Building competence in FBA: Are we headed in the right direction? Preventing School Failure, 44, 169–173.Google Scholar
  10. Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F. R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revisions, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 387–397.Google Scholar
  11. Dunlap, G., Kern, L., dePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Childs, K. E., White, R., & Falk, G. D. (1993). Functional analysis of classroom variables for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 275–291.Google Scholar
  12. Durand, V. M., & Carr, E. G. (1987). Social influences on “self-stimulatory” behavior: Analysis and treatment application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 119–132.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, J., Conroy, M., & Heckaman, K. (1998). Research issues in functional assessment of the challenging behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 26–33.Google Scholar
  14. Gable, R. A., Hendrickson, J. M., & Sasso, G. M. (1995). Toward a more functional analysis of aggression. Education and Treatment of Children, 18, 226–242.Google Scholar
  15. Gresham, F. (2003). Establishing the technical adequacy of functional behavioral assessment: Conceptual and measurement challenges. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 282–298.Google Scholar
  16. Heckaman, K., Conroy, M., Fox, J., & Chait, A. (2000). Functional assessment-based intervention research on students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 196–210.Google Scholar
  17. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub.L. No. 105-17, 20 USC Chapter 33, Section 1415 et seq. (EDLAW, 1997).Google Scholar
  18. Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). What make extinction work: An analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 131–144.Google Scholar
  19. Iwata, B. A., Smith, R. G., & Michael, J. (2000). Current research on the influence of establishing operations on behavior in applied settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 411–418.Google Scholar
  20. Jolivette, K., Wehby, J. H., & Hirsch, L. (1999). Academic strategy identification for students exhibiting inappropriate classroom behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 210–221.Google Scholar
  21. Kahng, S. W., & Iwata, B.(1999). Correspondence between outcomes of brief and extended functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 149–160.Google Scholar
  22. Kern, L., Childs, K., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Falk, G. D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 7–19.Google Scholar
  23. Kern, L., Choutka, C. M., & Sokol, N. (2002). Assessment-based antecedent interventions used in natural settings to reduce challenging behavior: An analysis of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 113–130.Google Scholar
  24. Lane, K. L., Umbreit, J., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E. (1999). Functional assessment research on students with or at risk for EBD: 1990 to present. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 1, 101–111.Google Scholar
  25. Lennox, D. B., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1989). Conducting a functional assessment of problem behavior in applied settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 304–311.Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, T. J., Powers, L. J., Kelk, M. J., & Newcomer, L. (2002) Reducing problem behaviors on the playground: An investigation of the application of school-wide positive behavior supports. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, T. J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(6), 1–24.Google Scholar
  28. LeVelle, J. A. (1998). Analog functional assessment in general education settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  29. Mace, F. C., Lalli, J. S., & Pinter-Lalli, E. (1991). Functional analysis and the treatment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, J. R., Roberts, M. L., Mathur, S. R., & Rutherford, R. B. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169–179.Google Scholar
  31. Nelson, J. R., Roberts, M. L., & Smith, D. (1998). Conducting functional behavioral assessment. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  32. Northrup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & DeRaad, A. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522.Google Scholar
  33. Peck, J., Sasso, G. M., & Jolivette, K. (1997). Use of structural analysis hypothesis testing model to improve social interactions via peer-mediated interventions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 219–230.Google Scholar
  34. Peck, J., Sasso, G. M., & Stambaugh, M. (1998). Functional analyses in the classroom: Gaining reliability without sacrificing validity. Preventing School Failure, 43, 14–18.Google Scholar
  35. Repp, A. (1994). Comments on functional analysis procedures for school-based behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 409–411.Google Scholar
  36. Sasso, G. M., Conroy, M., Stichter, J. P., & Fox, J. (2001). Slowing down the Bandwagon: The misapplication of functional behavior assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 282–296.Google Scholar
  37. Sasso, G., Peck, J., & Garrison-Harrell, L. (1998). Social Interaction Setting Events: Experimental Analysis of Contextual Variables. Behavior Disorders, 24, 34–43.Google Scholar
  38. Sasso, G., Reimers, T., Cooper, L., Wacker, D., Berg, W., Kelly, L., & Allaire, A. (1992) Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 809–821.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, T. M., Bucalos, A., Liaupsin, C., Nelson, C. M., Jolivette, K., DeShea, L. (2004). Using functional behavioral assessment in general education settings: Making a case for effectiveness and efficiency. Behavior Disorders, 29, 189–201.Google Scholar
  40. Stichter, J. P. (2001). Functional Analysis: The Use of Analogues in Applied Settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 232–239.Google Scholar
  41. Stichter, J. P., Conroy, M. A., & Boyd, B. (2004) The Undefined Role of the Antecedent: Addressing the Measurement Quagmires in Applied Research. Manuscript submitted to Education and Treatment of Children.Google Scholar
  42. Stichter, J. P., Clarke, S, & Dunlap, G. (2004a) An Analysis of Trends Regarding Proactive and Ecologically Valid Interventions in Applied Research. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 86–104.Google Scholar
  43. Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004b). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention.Google Scholar
  44. Stichter, J. P., & Sasso, G. M. (2000a). Using Setting Events Analysis to Increase Pro Social Behavior Across Educational Settings. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Association for Behavior Analysis International Convention, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  45. Stichter, J. P., Sasso, G. M., & Jolivette, K. (2004c). Including a student with EBD in a general education setting: Structural analysis as an evidence based practice. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 6, 148–165.Google Scholar
  46. Stichter, J. P., Shellady, S., Sealander, K. A., & Eigenberger, M. E. (2000b). Teaching what we do know: Preservice training and functional behavioral assessment. Preventing School Failure, 44, 142–146.Google Scholar
  47. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2001). School climate and discipline: Going to scale. Paper presented at the National Summit on the Shared Implementation of IDEA, Washington, D.C. Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Available: [2001, June 23,].Google Scholar
  48. Symons, F. J., Mc Donald, L. M., & Wehby, J. H. (1998). Functional assessment and teacher collected data. Education and Treatment of Children, 21, 135–159.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, J. C., Sisson, L. A., McKelevy, J. L. & Trefelner, M. F. (1993). Situation specificity in attention-seeking problem behavior. Behavior Modification, 17,474–497.Google Scholar
  50. Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 343–351.Google Scholar
  51. Umbreit, J., & Blair, K. (1997). Using structural analysis to facilitate treatment of aggression and noncompliance in a young child at risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 75–86.Google Scholar
  52. Umbreit, J. (1996). Functional analysis of disruptive behavior in an inclusive classroom. Journal of Early Intervention, 20, 18–29.Google Scholar
  53. Umbreit, J. (1995). Functional assessment and intervention in a regular classroom setting for the disruptive behavior of a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Disorders, 20, 267–278.Google Scholar
  54. Yell, M. L., & Shriner, J. G. (1997). The IDEA amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30, 1–19.Google Scholar
  55. Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., Bradley, R., & Rozalski, M. (2000). Ensuring compliance with the disciplinary provisions of IDEA ‘97: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 13, 3–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.University of FloridaUSA
  3. 3.303 Townsend, Department of Special EducationUniversity of MissouriColumbia

Personalised recommendations