Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 607–614 | Cite as

Cataract-associated D3Y mutation of human connexin46 (hCx46) increases the dye coupling of gap junction channels and suppresses the voltage sensitivity of hemichannels

  • Barbara Schlingmann
  • Patrik Schadzek
  • Stefan Busko
  • Alexander Heisterkamp
  • Anaclet NgezahayoEmail author


Connexin46 (Cx46), together with Cx50, forms gap junction channels between lens fibers and participates in the lens pump-leak system, which is essential for the homeostasis of this avascular organ. Mutations in Cx50 and Cx46 correlate with cataracts, but the functional relationship between the mutations and cataract formation is not always clear. Recently, it was found that a mutation at the third position of hCx46 that substituted an aspartic acid residue with a tyrosine residue (hCx46D3Y) caused an autosomal dominant zonular pulverulent cataract. We expressed EGFP-labeled hCx46wt and hCx46D3Y in HeLa cells and found that the mutation did not affect the formation of gap junction plaques. Dye transfer experiments using Lucifer Yellow (LY) and ethidium bromide (EthBr) showed an increased degree of dye coupling between the cell pairs expressing hCx46D3Y in comparison to the cell pairs expressing hCx46wt. In Xenopus oocytes, two-electrode voltage-clamp experiments revealed that hCx46wt formed voltage-sensitive hemichannels. This was not observed in the oocytes expressing hCx46D3Y. The replacement of the aspartic acid residue at the third position by another negatively charged residue, glutamic acid, to generate the mutant hCx46D3E, restored the voltage sensitivity of the resultant hemichannels. Moreover, HeLa cell pairs expressing hCx46D3E and hCx46wt showed a similar degree of dye coupling. These results indicate that the negatively charged aspartic acid residue at the third position of the N-terminus of hCx46 could be involved in the determination of the degree of metabolite cell-to-cell coupling and is essential for the voltage sensitivity of the hCx46 hemichannels.


hCx46 N-terminus Voltage sensitivity Dye transfer Hemichannels Cataract 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbaci M, Barberi-Heyob M, Blondel W, Guillemin F, Didelon J (2008) Advantages and limitations of commonly used methods to assay the molecular permeability of gap junctional intercellular communication. Biotechniques 45:33–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addison PK, Berry V, Holden KR, Espinal D, Rivera B, Su H, Srivastava AK, Bhattacharya SS (2006) A novel mutation in the connexin 46 gene (GJA3) causes autosomal dominant zonular pulverulent cataract in a Hispanic family. Mol Vis 12:791–795Google Scholar
  3. Arora A, Minogue PJ, Liu X, Addison PK, Russel-Eggitt I, Webster AR, Hunt DM, Ebihara L, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM, Moore AT (2008) A novel connexin50 mutation associated with congenital nuclear pulverulent cataracts. J Med Genet 45:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arora, A., Minogue, P.J., Liu, X., Reddy, M.A., Ainsworth, J.R., Bhattacharya, S.S., Webster, A.R., Hunt, D.M., Ebihara, L., Moore, A.T., Beyer, E.C. and Berthoud, V.M. (2006) A novel GJA8 mutation is associated with autosomal dominant lamellar pulverulent cataract: further evidence for gap junction dysfunction in human cataract. J Med Genet. 43:e2 (
  5. Berthoud VM, Beyer EC (2009) Oxidative stress, lens gap junctions, and cataracts. Antioxid Redox Signal 11:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berthoud VM, Minogue PJ, Guo J, Williamson EK, Xu X, Ebihara L, Beyer EC (2003) Loss of function and impaired degradation of a cataract-associated mutant connexin50. Eur J Cell Biol 82:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beyer EC, Lipkind GM, Kyle JW, Berthoud VM (2012) Structural organization of intercellular channels II. Amino terminal domain of the connexins: sequence, functional roles, and structure. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818:1823–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donaldson P, Kistler J, Mathias RT (2001) Molecular solutions to mammalian lens transparency. News Physiol Sci 16:118–123Google Scholar
  9. Dong L, Liu X, Li H, Vertel BM, Ebihara L (2006) Role of the N-terminus in permeability of chicken connexin45.6 gap junctional channels. J Physiol 576:787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebihara, L., Berthoud, V.M. and Beyer, E.C. (1995) Distinct behavior of connexin56 and connexin46 gap junctional channels can be predicted from the behavior of their hemi-gap-junctional channels. Biophys J.68:1796-1803Google Scholar
  11. Elfgang C, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Frate H, Butterweck A, Traub O, Klein RA, Hulser DF, Willecke K (1995) Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. J Cell Biol 129:805–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falk MM, Kumar NM, Gilula NB (1994) Membrane insertion of gap junction connexins: polytopic channel forming membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 127:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerido DA, White TW (2004) Connexin disorders of the ear, skin, and lens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez D, Gomez-Hernandez JM, Barrio LC (2007) Molecular basis of voltage dependence of connexin channels: an integrative appraisal. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 94:66–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodenough DA (1992) The crystalline lens. A system networked by gap junctional intercellular communication. Semin Cell Biol 3:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen L, Yao W, Eiberg H, Funding M, Riise R, Kjaer KW, Hejtmancik JF, Rosenberg T (2006) The congenital “ant-egg” cataract phenotype is caused by a missense mutation in connexin46. Mol Vis 12:1033–1039Google Scholar
  17. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kyle JW, Berthoud VM, Kurutz J, Minogue PJ, Greenspan M, Hanck DA, Beyer EC (2009) The N terminus of connexin37 contains an alpha-helix that is required for channel function. J Biol Chem 284:20418–20427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kyle JW, Minogue PJ, Thomas BC, Domowicz DA, Berthoud VM, Hanck DA, Beyer EC (2008) An intact connexin N-terminus is required for function but not gap junction formation. J Cell Sci 121:2744–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lichtenstein A, Gaietta GM, Deerinck TJ, Crum J, Sosinsky GE, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM (2009) The cytoplasmic accumulations of the cataract-associated mutant, Connexin50P88S, are long-lived and form in the endoplasmic reticulum. Exp Eye Res 88:600–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maeda S, Nakagawa S, Suga M, Yamashita E, Oshima A, Fujiyoshi Y, Tsukihara T (2009) Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. Nature 458:597–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maeda S, Tsukihara T (2011) Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:1115–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mathias RT, Rae JL, Baldo GJ (1997) Physiological properties of the normal lens. Physiol Rev 77:21–50Google Scholar
  24. Mathias RT, White TW, Gong X (2010) Lens gap junctions in growth, differentiation, and homeostasis. Physiol Rev 90:179–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Minogue PJ, Liu X, Ebihara L, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM (2005) An aberrant sequence in a connexin46 mutant underlies congenital cataracts. J Biol Chem 280:40788–40795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minogue PJ, Tong JJ, Arora A, Russell-Eggitt I, Hunt DM, Moore AT, Ebihara L, Beyer EC, Berthoud VM (2009) A mutant connexin50 with enhanced hemichannel function leads to cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:5837–5845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oh S, Abrams CK, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA (2000) Stoichiometry of transjunctional voltage-gating polarity reversal by a negative charge substitution in the amino terminus of a connexin32 chimera. J Gen Physiol 116:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oh S, Rivkin S, Tang Q, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA (2004) Determinants of gating polarity of a connexin 32 hemichannel. Biophys J 87:912–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oh S, Rubin JB, Bennett MV, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA (1999) Molecular determinants of electrical rectification of single channel conductance in gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32. J Gen Physiol 114:339–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pal JD, Liu X, Mackay D, Shiels A, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC, Ebihara L (2000) Connexin46 mutations linked to congenital cataract show loss of gap junction channel function. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279:C596–C602Google Scholar
  31. Paul DL, Ebihara L, Takemoto LJ, Swenson KI, Goodenough DA (1991) Connexin46, a novel lens gap junction protein, induces voltage-gated currents in nonjunctional plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Biol 115:1077–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Purnick PE, Benjamin DC, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA, Dowd TL (2000a) Structure of the amino terminus of a gap junction protein. Arch Biochem Biophys 381:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Purnick PE, Oh S, Abrams CK, Verselis VK, Bargiello TA (2000b) Reversal of the gating polarity of gap junctions by negative charge substitutions in the N-terminus of connexin 32. Biophys J 79:2403–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sohl G, Willecke K (2004) Gap junctions and the connexin protein family. Cardiovasc Res 62:228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Srinivas M, Kronengold J, Bukauskas FF, Bargiello TA, Verselis VK (2005) Correlative studies of gating in Cx46 and Cx50 hemichannels and gap junction channels. Biophys J 88:1725–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas BC, Minogue PJ, Valiunas V, Kanaporis G, Brink PR, Berthoud VM, Beyer EC (2008) Cataracts are caused by alterations of a critical N-terminal positive charge in connexin50. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:2549–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tong JJ, Liu X, Dong L, Ebihara L (2004) Exchange of gating properties between rat cx46 and chicken cx45.6. Biophys J 87:2397–2406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verselis VK, Ginter CS, Bargiello TA (1994) Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. Nature 368:348–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walter WJ, Zeilinger C, Bintig W, Kolb HA, Ngezahayo A (2008) Phosphorylation in the C-terminus of the rat connexin46 (rCx46) and regulation of the conducting activity of the formed connexons. J Bioenerg Biomembr 40:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White TW, Bruzzone R (2000) Intercellular communication in the eye: clarifying the need for connexin diversity. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 32:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Schlingmann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patrik Schadzek
    • 1
  • Stefan Busko
    • 1
  • Alexander Heisterkamp
    • 3
  • Anaclet Ngezahayo
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of BiophysicsLeibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Center for Systems Neuroscience HannoverUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover FoundationHannoverGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Applied OpticsFriedrich-Schiller-University-JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations