Assessment of Anxiety in Older Adults: Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS)
- 315 Downloads
Anxiety occurs frequently among older adults, and can have deleterious impacts on the quality of daily life. Due to the dearth of well-validated elder-specific anxiety screening instruments available in the German language, this study aimed to translate the Geriatric Anxiety Scale (GAS), a reliable and valid 30-item self-report screening instrument for assessing anxiety based on DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria (Segal et al. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24(7), 709–714, 2010a), into German, and to validate the new measure. The German version of the GAS was developed through a translation and back translation process, with careful attention paid to culturally-sensitive expressions of anxiety in the German older adult population. The final version of the German GAS was tested in a sample of 242 community-dwelling older adults (Mage = 72.0 years, SD = 6.9 years; 59 % women) who completed either an online (26 %) or a paper-pencil (74 %) version of the questionnaire. The findings confirmed the successful translation of the GAS into German and provided psychometric support for the new measure. The validation of the factor structure based on confirmatory factor analyses was in support of a unidimensional structure of the GAS-G. Correlational analyses with inventories measuring anxiety related and non-anxiety related personality traits additionally confirmed the convergent and discriminant validity of the GAS for use as an assessment measure for anxiety among German older adults.
KeywordsAnxiety Aging Assessment Screening GAS Geriatric anxiety scale
We gratefully thank Cynthia Mech and Christine Waegner from Saarland University for their help in collecting and preparing the data. We also thank Octavia Harrison from Saarland University for her support in the back translation process, as well as Prof. Dr. Oliver K. Schilling from Heidelberg University and Dr. Sonja Römer from Saarland University for their evaluation of the appropriateness of the German GAS items.
The GAS is available for free for research purposes and may be obtained from either Dr. Gottschling (email@example.com) or Dr. Segal (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Conflict of Interest
Juliana Gottschling, Daniel Segal, Claudia Häusele, Gundula Stoll, and Frank Spinath declare that they do not have any interests that might have influenced this research. The same work (or closely related research) has not been published or accepted for publication elsewhere. It will not be submitted elsewhere prior to Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment making an editorial decision. No other papers using the same data set have been published. The article has been approved by all of the authors and by the institutions at which the work was carried out. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. I have assumed responsibility for keeping my coauthors informed of our progress through the editorial review process, the content of the reviews, and any revisions made.
The procedures, protocol, and informed consent in the present study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Saarland University.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Derogatis, L. R. (1993). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: National Computer Systems, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.statisticssolutions.com/brief-symptom-inventory-bsi/
- Derogatis, L. R. (2000). BSI-18: Brief Symptom Inventory 18 – Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. Minneapolis: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Dilling, H., Mombour, W., Schmidt, M. H., & Schulte-Markwort, E. (2004). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10 Kapitel V [International Classification of mental disorders: ICD-10 Chapter V] (5th ed.). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
- Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1999). Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- First, M., Spitzer, R., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, research version. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
- Franke, G. H. (2000). BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory – Deutsche Version. Manual.. Beltz: Göttingen.Google Scholar
- Gum, A. M., King-Kallimanis, B., & Kohn, R. (2009). Prevalence of mood, anxiety, and substance-abuse disorders for older Americans in the national comorbidity survey-replication. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(9), 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
- Kabacoff, R. I., Segal, D. L., Hersen, M., & Van Hasselt, V. B. (1997). Psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory with older adult psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11(1), 33–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule”(PANAS) [Studies with a German version of the “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule”(PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.Google Scholar
- Lang, F. R., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Test quality and equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) with young, middle-old and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47(3), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Margraf, J., & Ehlers, A. (2007). Beck-Angst-Inventar (BAI) Manual. [The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Manual]. Frankfurt am Main: Hardcourt Test Services GmbH.Google Scholar
- Mehta, K. M., Simonsick, E. M., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Schulz, R., Rubin, S. M., Satterfield, S., & Yaffe, K. (2003). Prevalence and correlates of anxiety symptoms in well-functioning older adults: findings from the health aging and body composition study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(4), 499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mueller, A. E., Segal, D. L., Gavett, B., Marty, M. A., Yochim, B., June, A., & Coolidge, F. L. (2015). Geriatric Anxiety Scale: item response theory analysis, differential item functioning, and creation of a ten-item short form (GAS-10). International Psychogeriatrics, 27, 1099–1111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables (Version 6). Los Angeles: Authors.Google Scholar
- Sass, H., Wittchen, H. U., Zaudig, M., & Houben, I. (2003). Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen DSM-IV-TR: Textrevision [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR: Revised text]. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag.Google Scholar
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online, 8(2), 23–74.Google Scholar
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman & S. Wright (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
- Seeman, T. E., Berkman, L. F., Charpentier, P. A., Blazer, D. G., Albert, M. S., & Tinetti, M. E. (1995). Behavioral and psychosocial predictors of physical performance: MacArthur studies of successful aging. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 50(4), 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Segal, D. L., Qualls, S. H., & Smyer, M. A. (2010b). Aging and mental health (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Spitzer, C., Hammer, S., Löwe, B., Grabe, H., Barnow, S., Rose, M., et al. (2011). Die Kurzform des Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18): Erste Befunde zu den psychometrischen Kennwerten der deutschen Version [The short version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18): Initial results of the psychometric properties of the German version]. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie, 79(09), 517–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2013.“Deutschland und Internationales” [Statistical Yearbook 2013]. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
- Vink, D., Aartsen, M. J., Comijs, H. C., Heymans, M. W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Stek, M. L., et al. (2009). Onset of anxiety and depression in the aging population: comparison of risk factors in a 9-year prospective study. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(8), 642–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.Google Scholar
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar