Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) in a Predominately Hispanic, Low-Income Sample
- 410 Downloads
The goal of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) with 12- to 15-month-old infants from predominately Hispanic, low-income families. Mothers of 144 infants were screened at a pediatric clinic as part of a larger study examining a brief home-based intervention for infants at-risk for behavior problems. Reliability was good for the BITSEA problem scale in all analyses and acceptable for the BITSEA competence scale in most analyses. Discriminative validity was supported by scores on the BITSEA competence scale significantly predicting delayed status on all ASQ-3 subscales. BITSEA problem scale scores significantly predicted scores on the total problems scale of the Child Behavior Checklist, supporting predictive validity. Analyses revealed a main effect of group on BITSEA problem scale scores, providing preliminary support for sensitivity to change for the BITSEA problem scale. Results support the BITSEA as an effective screening tool for use with young infants, Hispanic and Spanish-speaking populations, and low-income families.
KeywordsInfant behavior Assessment Psychometrics Screening
This study was funded by a career development award from the National Institute of Mental Health to the third author (K23 MH085659).
Conflict of Interest
Gabriela M. Hungerford, Dainelys Garcia, and Daniel M. Bagner declared that they have no conflict of interest.
All experimental protocols were approved by the appropriate institutional review boards and meet the guidelines of the responsible government agency. Informed consent was obtained from all adult participants.
- Achenbach, T. M. (1992). Manual for the child behavior checklist/2-3 and 1992 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. (2006). Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics, 118(1), 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bagner, D., Harwood, M., & Eyberg, S. (2006). Psychometric considerations in child behavioral assessment. Handbook of child behavioral assessment, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar
- Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development: Bayley-III. Harcourt Assessment, Psych. Corporation.Google Scholar
- Briggs-Gowan, M. J., & Carter, A. S. (2002). Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) manual, version 2.0. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
- Carter, A. S., & Briggs-Gowan, M. J. (2006a). Infant-toddler social and emotional assessment. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Carter, A. S., & Briggs-Gowan, M. J. (2006b). ITSEA/BITSEA: Infant toddler and brief infant toddler social and emotional assessment Examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
- DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2013). Current population reports, P60–245, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Gross, D., Sambrook, A., & Fogg, L. (1999). Behavior problems among young children in low-income urban day care centers. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(1), 15–25. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199902)22:1<15::aid-nur3>3.0.co;2-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karabekiroglu, K., Rodopman-Arman, A., Ay, P., Ozkesen, M., Akbas, S., Tasdemir, G. N., Boke, O., & Peksen, Y. (2009). The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the brief infant–toddler social emotional assessment (BITSEA). Infant Behavior and Development, 32(3), 291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.03.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ortman, J. M., & Shin, H. B. (2011). Language projections: 2010 to 2020. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Las Vegas, NV, August.Google Scholar
- Pons, J. I., Matías-Carrelo, L., Rodríguez, M., Rodríguez, J. M., Herrans, L. L., Jiménez, M. E., & Jiménez, K. (2008). Estudios de validez de la Escala de Inteligencia Wechsler para Adultos Versión III, Puerto Rico (EIWA-III). Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 19, 75–111.Google Scholar
- Preciado, J., & Henry, M. (1997). Linguistic barriers in health education and services.Google Scholar
- Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Supplee, L., Gardner, F., & Arnds, K. (2006). Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Squires, J., & Bricker, D. (2009). Ages & stages questionnaires, Third Edition (ASQ-3): A parent -completed child monitoring system (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
- Squires, J., Twombly, E., Bricker, D., & Potter, L. (2009). ASQ-3 user’s guide. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
- Vaz, S., Parsons, R., Passmore, A. E., Andreou, P., & Falkmer, T. (2013). Internal consistency, test–retest reliability and measurement error of the self-report version of the Social Skills Rating System in a sample of Australian adolescents. PLoS One, 8(9), e73924.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar