Advertisement

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 111–117 | Cite as

Solution structure of the PhoP DNA-binding domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis

  • Ramsay Macdonald
  • Dibyendu Sarkar
  • Brendan R. Amer
  • Robert T. Clubb
NMR structure note

Biological context

The bacterial pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) causes tuberculosis resulting annually in ~1.5 million fatalities world-wide (WHO 2014). During the initial stage of an infection, MTB is inhaled and transported to the lungs where it is believed to infect alveolar macrophages (Russell et al. 2010). Once inside the macrophage, MTB encounters new oxidative and acidic stressors, and alters its gene expression profile to cope with this new environment (Gonzalo-Asensio et al. 2008). The MTB PhoP-PhoR (PhoPR) two-component system plays a critical role in microbial adaptation. In this system, environmental signals received by the membrane associated PhoR protein trigger its autophosphorylation. PhoR then transfers the phosphate to the cytoplasmic PhoP response regulator, which in its phosphorylated state sequence specifically binds DNA with high affinity (Pathak et al. 2010). Several studies have shown that PhoP is required for MTB virulence (Perez et al. 2001;...

Keywords

NOESY Spectrum Distance Restraint Chemical Shift Assignment Dihedral Angle Restraint Side Chain Chemical Shift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Albert H. Chan and Megan Sjodt for guidance throughout the structure determination process. We would like to thank Dr. Robert Peterson for assistance with NMR experiments. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant AI52217 to RTC. R. M. was supported by a Cellular and Molecular Biology Training Grant (Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award GM007185). D. S. was supported by Raman Research Fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India. B. R. A. was supported by a Whitcome Predoctoral Training Grant, University of California—Los Angeles, Molecular Biology Institute. This material is based upon work supported by the US. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research program under Award Number DE-FC02-02ER63421.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

Research does not involve human participants and/or animals.

References

  1. Berjanskii MV, Wishart DS (2005) A simple method to predict protein flexibility using secondary chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 127:14970–14971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG III, Skelton NJ (1995) Protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen VB, Arendall WB III, Headd JJ et al (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 66:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Das AK, Pathak A, Sinha A et al (2010) A single-amino-acid substitution in the C terminus of PhoP determines DNA-binding specificity of the virulence-associated response regulator from mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Mol Biol 398:647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW et al (1995) NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes*. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delano WL (2002) The pymol user’s manual. DeLano Scientific, San CarlosGoogle Scholar
  7. Garrett DS, Powers R, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1991) A common sense approach to peak picking in two-, three-, and four-dimensional spectra using automatic computer analysis of contour diagrams. J Magn Reson 95:214–220ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Goddard TD, Kneller DG (2006) SPARKY 3. University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalo-Asensio J, Mostowy S, Harders-Westerveen J et al (2008) PhoP: a missing piece in the intricate puzzle of mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. PLoS ONE 3:e3496CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Hafsa NE, Wishart DS (2014) CSI 2.0: a significantly improved version of the chemical shift index. J Biomol NMR 60:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He X, Wang S (2014) DNA consensus sequence motif for binding response regulator PhoP, a virulence regulator of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry 53:8008–8020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrmann T (2010) UNIO’ 10: automated NMR data analysis for protein structure determination and more (version 2.0.2)Google Scholar
  13. Herrmann T, Güntert P, Wüthrich K (2002a) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J Mol Biol 319:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrmann T, Güntert P, Wüthrich K (2002b) Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE-identification in the NOESY spectra using the new software ATNOS. J Biomol NMR 24:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller R (2004) The computer aided resonance assignment tutorial. Cantina, GoldauGoogle Scholar
  16. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K (1996) MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 14:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laskowski RA, Rullmann JAC, MacArthur MW et al (1996) AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR 8:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Menon S, Wang S (2011) Structure of the response regulator PhoP from mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals a dimer through the receiver domain. Biochemistry 50:5948–5957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pathak A, Goyal R, Sinha A, Sarkar D (2010) Domain structure of virulence-associated response regulator PhoP of mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem 285:34309–34318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perez E, Samper S, Bordas Y et al (2001) An essential role for phoP in mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Mol Microbiol 41:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell DG, VanderVen BC, Lee W et al (2010) Mycobacterium tuberculosis wears what it eats. Cell Host Microbe 8:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryndak M, Wang S, Smith I (2008) PhoP, a key player in mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Trends Microbiol 16:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N, Clore GM (2003) The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson 160:65–73CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen Y, Delaglio F, Cornilescu G, Bax A (2009) TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR 44:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinha A, Gupta S, Bhutani S et al (2008) PhoP-PhoP interaction at adjacent PhoP binding sites is influenced by protein phosphorylation. J Bacteriol 190:1317–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walters SB, Dubnau E, Kolesnikova I et al (2006) The mycobacterium tuberculosis PhoPR two-component system regulates genes essential for virulence and complex lipid biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol 60:312–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang S, Engohang-Ndong J, Smith I (2007) Structure of the DNA-binding domain of the response regulator PhoP from mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry 46:14751–14761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. WHO (2014) Global tuberculosis report 2014. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Wüthrich K (1986) NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramsay Macdonald
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dibyendu Sarkar
    • 4
  • Brendan R. Amer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert T. Clubb
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.UCLA-DOE Institute of Genomics and ProteomicsUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Molecular Biology InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.CSIR-Institute of Microbial TechnologyChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations