Primary mathematics teacher education in Australia and China: What might we learn from each other?
The preparation of teachers to teach mathematics to primary school children differs across nations and cultures. This study used mixed methods to examine the basic content knowledge of trainee teachers in Australia and China. A simple test (30 questions) of content based on an international comparative study in mathematics teacher training found that many of the Australian trainee teachers struggled with material that they might be expected to teach, while the Chinese teachers largely demonstrated mastery. The significance of this finding is examined in the context of the teacher preparation programs in two teacher training institutions. Cultural commentary is added by leading academics in each institution. It was found that in the Australian teacher training institution there was a focus on generic skills and relatively limited opportunity to develop trainee teachers’ content knowledge or specific pedagogy. The relevance of the findings is discussed through the framework of different beliefs in the nature of mathematics and mathematics teaching that have been reported to dominate the different educational systems in China and Australia.
KeywordsPrimary mathematics Teacher training China Australia Content knowledge
- Australian Academy of Science. (2015). Desktop review of mathematics education pedagogical approaches and learning resources. Retrieved from www.science.org.au.
- Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (1996). Statement on the use of calculators and computers for mathematics in Australian schools. Retrieved from www.aamt.edu.au/content/download/725/19521/file/tech_st.pdf.
- Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2015). Desktop Review of Mathematics School Education Pedagogical Approaches and Learning Resources. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/desktop-review-mathematics-school-education-pedagogical-approaches-and-learning-resources.
- Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). The Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Rationale.
- Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list.
- Ball, D. (1988). Unlearning to teach mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8, 40–48.Google Scholar
- Ball, D., Hill, H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, Fall. Retrieved from www.aft.org/pubs-reports/americian_educator/fall05.
- Boesen, J. (2006). Assessing mathematical creativity: Comparing national and teacher made tests, explaining the differences and impact. www.gu.se/forskning/publikation/?publicationId=128530.
- Burghes, D. (2007). International comparative study in mathematics training. CfBT Education Trust. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/papers/icsmtt.pdf.
- Burghes, D. (2011). International comparative study in mathematics training: Recommendations for initial teacher training in England. CfBT Education Trust. Retrieved from https://www.nationalstemcentre.org.uk/res/documents/page/International%20comparative%20study%20in%20mathematics%20teacher%20training.pdf.
- Department of Education and Science. (1982). Inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools, mathematics Counts (Cockcroft Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, W. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5–23). Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
- Huang, R., & Leung, K. (2004). Cracking the paradox of Chinese learners: Looking into mathematics classrooms in Hong Kong and Shanghai. In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 348–381). New Jersey: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Colleges and Universities. (2015). Universities in China by 2015 University Web Ranking. Retrieved from http://www.4icu.org/cn/.
- Lai, M., & Murray, S. (2012). Teaching with procedural variation: A Chinese way of promoting deep understanding of mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/.
- Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Marshall, J. (2003). Math wars: Taking sides. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3), 193–200. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/documents/math-wars-taking-sides.pdf.
- Masters, G. (2009). A shared challenge: Improving literacy, numeracy and science learning in Queensland primary schools. Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/mastersreview/.
- Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008–2014). National assessment program, literacy and numeracy: Numeracy. Carlton, Victoria: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
- Muller, J. (2000). Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum and education policy. London, New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
- Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMMS International Results in Mathematics. Retrieved from: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-results-mathematics.html.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Executive summary: Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=23749.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2015). Principles and standards of school Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-.and-Standards/Principles,-Standards,-and-Expectations/.
- Norton, S. (2011). How deeply and how well? How ready to teach mathematics after a one year program? Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 12(1), 65–82.Google Scholar
- Norton, S. (2012). Prior study of mathematics as a predictor of pre-service teachers’ success on mathematics content and pedagogical content knowledge tests. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(1), 2–26.Google Scholar
- Norton, S., & Zhang, Q. (2013). A post card from a primary mathematics classroom in Chongqing China. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 18(2), 9–14.Google Scholar
- Rotherham, A., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21.Google Scholar
- Ruthven, K. (2001). The English experience of a calculator-aware number curriculum. In J. Anghileri (Ed.), Principles and practices in arithmetic teaching: Innovative approaches for the primary classroom (pp. 165–188). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Ruthven, K. (2009). Towards a calculator-aware number curriculum. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(1), x-x. Retrieved from https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/people/staff/ruthven/RuthvenMJRMEpreprint.pdf.
- Sfard, A. (2003). Balancing the unbalanceable: The NCTM standards in the light of theories of learning mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, W. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 353–392). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Shuard, H., Walsh, A., Goodwin, J., & Worchester, V. (1991). Calculators, children and mathematics. London, UK: Simons & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19–34.Google Scholar
- Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2014). Action now! Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from http://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_print.pdf.
- Thomson, S., Hillman, K., Wernert, N., Schmid, M., & Munene, A. (2012). Highlights from the TIMMS AND PIRLS 2011 from Australia’s perspective. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Thomson, S., Wernert, N., Underwood, C., & Nicholas, M. (2007). TIMSS 07: Taking a closer look at mathematics and science in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/TIMSS_2007-AustraliaFullReport.pdf.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf.