Exploring iconic interpretation and mathematics teacher development through clinical simulations
- 530 Downloads
Field placements serve as the traditional ‘clinical’ experience for prospective mathematics teachers to immerse themselves in the mathematical challenges of students. This article reports data from a different type of learning experience, that of a clinical simulation with a standardized individual. We begin with a brief background on medical education’s long-standing use of standardized patients, and the recent diffusion of clinical simulations to teacher and school leader preparation contexts. Then, we describe a single mathematics simulation and report data from prospective mathematics teachers’ interactions with a standardized student on the issue of iconic interpretation. Findings highlight teachers’ diagnostic, explanatory, mathematical, and instructional repertoires, as they guide a standardized student through two different graphing problems. Implications focus on the trends in teachers’ instructional decisions, contextualized explanations, and the use of clinical simulations to enhance mathematics teacher development.
KeywordsClinical simulation Iconic interpretation Mathematics teacher education Teacher development
The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation’s Discovery Research K-12 (DR-K12) program for its support of this research (Award #1118772). The perspectives represented in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views or opinions of the National Science Foundation. Additionally, the authors acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of three JMTE reviewers and their contributions to refining this article.
- Barrows, H. S. (1987). Simulated (standardized) patients and other human simulations: A comprehensive guide to their training and use in teaching and evaluation. Chapel Hill, NC: Health Sciences Consortium.Google Scholar
- Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Barrows, H. S., & Abrahmson, S. (1964). The programmed patient: A technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. Journal of Medical Education, 39, 802–805.Google Scholar
- Dotger, B. (2011). From know how to do now: Instructional applications of simulated interactions within teacher education. Teacher Education and Practice, 24(2), 132–148.Google Scholar
- Dotger, B. (2013). “I had no idea!”: Clinical simulations for teacher development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dotger, B. (2014). Core pedagogy: Individual uncertainty, shared practice, formative ethos. Article submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Phillip, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Geslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–380). New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Monk, S. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Learning to graph and graphing to learn. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 250–262). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1959). Logic and psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., & Colestock, A. A. (2011). Accessing mathematics teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 79–94). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. S. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Speech presented at the Math Science Partnership (MSP) Workshop: “Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning”. Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.