Facilitating growth in prospective teachers’ knowledge: teaching geometry in primary schools
This paper reports on a study that focused on growth of understanding about teaching geometry by a group of prospective teachers engaged in lesson plan study within a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Participation in the activity was found to facilitate considerable growth in the participants’ pedagogical-content knowledge (PCK). Factors that influenced growth in PCK included the nature of the lesson planning task, the cognitive scaffolds inserted into the CSCL virtual space, the meta-language scaffolds provided to the participants, and the provision of both private and public discourse spaces. The paper concludes with recommendations for enhancing effective knowledge-building discourse about mathematics PCK within prospective teacher education CSCL environments.
KeywordsTeacher education Pedagogical-content knowledge Computer-supported collaborative learning Mathematics education
- Alsup, J. (2004). A comparison of constructivist and traditional instruction in mathematics. Educational Research Quarterly, 28(4), 3–17.Google Scholar
- Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Bereiter, C. (Ed.). (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Berenson, S. (2003 April). Lesson plan study: A viable pedagogy for teacher educators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (1992). Reaching potentials through appropriate curriculum: Conceptual frameworks for applying the guidelines. In S. Bredekamp & T. Rosegrant (Eds.), Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. (Vol. 1, p. 33). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
- Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2010). Understanding private discourse in a public online forum. Toronto: IKIT. http://ikit.org/SummerInstitute2010/doc/29-NF-Brett-Hewitt.pdf. Accessed September 10, 2010.
- Brett, C., Nason, R. A., & Woodruff, E. (2002). Communities of inquiry among pre-service teachers investigating mathematics. THEMES in Education, 3(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
- Chinnapan, M., Nason, R., & Lawson, M. (1996). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical and content knowledge about trigonometry and geometry: An initial investigation. In D. Clarke & S. Groves (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 115–123). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/. Accessed August 10, 2006.
- Even, D., & Tirosh, R. (2002). Teacher knowledge and the understanding of student knowledge. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook on international research in mathematics education (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. K. (2005–2006). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects’. EBK working paper 2005–2006. London: Economic and Social Research Council. https://blog.itu.dk/MKUM-E2010/files/2010/09/the-role-of-visual-representations-as-epistemic-objects.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2011.
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). The development of epistemic fluency: Learning to think for a living. In A. Brew & J. Sachs (Eds.), Transforming a university: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice (pp. 57–68). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
- Hakkarainen, K., Ritella, G., & Seitamaa- Hakkarainen, P. (2009). Epistemic mediation, chronotype, and expansive knowledge practices. http://utu.academia.edu/KaiHakkarainen/Papers/330988/Draft_of_Hakkarainen_K._Ritella_G._and_Seitamaa-Hakkarainen_P._submitted_Epistemic_mediation_chronotope_and_expansive_knowledge_practices. Accessed January 15, 2010.
- Jones, K., Mooney, C., & Harries, T. (2002). Trainee primary teachers’ knowledge of geometry for teaching. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 22(2), 95–100. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/12596/ Accessed June 25, 2008.
- Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In A. DiStefano, K. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 269–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003 April). International design principles for knowledge building: Innovative learning processes in knowledge-rich interactive environments. Paper presented at the Chaired symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2007). Fostering communities of learners and knowledge building: An interrupted dialogue. In J. C. Campione, K. E. Metz, & A. S. Palincsar (Eds.), Children’s learning in the laboratory and in the classroom: Essays in honor of Ann brown (pp. 197–212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
- Sowden, S., & Keeves, J. (1990). Analysis of evidence in humanistic studies. In H. Walberg & G. Haertel (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of educational evaluation (pp. 649–663). London: Pelgamon.Google Scholar
- Steffe, L. (1991). The constructivist teaching experiment: Illustrations and implications. In E. VonGlaserfield (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 177–194). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Sterelny, K. (2004). Externalism, epistemic artefacts and the extended mind. In R. Schantz, (Ed.), The externalist challenge: New studies on cognition and intentionality (pp. 239–254). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 2002 (pp. 573–574). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed. Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Yoshida, M. (2005). An overview of lesson study. In P. Wang-Iverson & M. Yoshida (Eds.), Building our understanding of lesson study (pp. 3–14). Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar