Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 10, Issue 4–6, pp 405–414 | Cite as

“Once More About the Quadratic Trinomial…”: On the Formation of Methodological Skills

  • Alexander Karp
Article
  • 180 Downloads

Abstract

This article discusses certain aspects of mathematics teacher education in Russia. To be able successfully to teach through problems, a teacher must know how to select the necessary assignments, to construct mathematical tasks according to methodological principles, and to organize work on these assignments in the classroom; in short, as they say in Russia, the teacher must possess certain well-defined methodological skills. This article analyzes examples of work with pre-service and in-service teachers leading to the formation of such skills. As the author tries to show, substantive and deep mathematical activity can take place in the context of tidying even the most routine school-level topics, such as the quadratic trinomial.

Keywords

Problem solving Methodological skills Quadratic trinomial 

References

  1. Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooney, T. (1985). A beginning teacher’s view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Even, R., & Markovits, Z. (1993). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of functions: characterization and applications. Journal of Structural Learning, 12(1), 35–51.Google Scholar
  5. Karp, A. (2004). Conducting Research and Solving Problems: The Russian Experience of Inservice Training. In T. Watanabe, & D. Thompson (Eds.) The Work of Mathematics Teacher Educators. Exchanging Ideas for Effective Practice (pp. 35–48). Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.Google Scholar
  6. Karp, A. (2006). And now put aside your pens and calculators: on mental problem solving in the high school mathematics classroom. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 28(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  7. Lednev, V., Nikandrov, N., Lazutova, M. (1998). Uchebnye standarty Rossii (Russian Teaching Standards), vol. 2. Moscow: Promethey.Google Scholar
  8. Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Hillsdale: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Liaschenko, E. (Ed.) (1988). Laboratornye i prakticheskie raboty po metodike prepodavania matematiki (Laboratory and Practical Studies on Mathematics Teaching Methodology). Moscow: Prosveschenie.Google Scholar
  10. Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merseth, Katherine (2003). Windows on teaching math: Cases of middle and secondary classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: VA.Google Scholar
  13. Runesson, U. (2005). Beyound discourse and interaction. Variation: a critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarantsev, G. (2002). Metodika obuchenia matematike v sredney shkole (School Mathematics Teaching Methodology). Moscow: Prosveschenie.Google Scholar
  15. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Google Scholar
  16. Stefanova, N., & Podhodova, N. (Eds.) (2005). Metodika i technologiia obucheniia matematike. Kurs lekzii (The Methodology and Technology of Mathematics Teaching. A Course of Lectures). Moscow: Drofa.Google Scholar
  17. Vygotsky, Lev (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity. Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Zaslavsky, O. (1995). Open-ended tasks as a trigger for mathematics teachers’ professional development. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 15–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in MathematicsTeachers College, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations