Evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valve failure using a matrix-fibril shear stress transfer approach
- 243 Downloads
A matrix-fibril shear stress transfer approach is devised and developed in this paper to analyse the primary biomechanical factors which initiate the structural degeneration of the bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs). Using this approach, the critical length of the collagen fibrils l c and the interface shear acting on the fibrils in both BHV and natural aortic valve (AV) tissues under physiological loading conditions are calculated and presented. It is shown that the required critical fibril length to provide effective reinforcement to the natural AV and the BHV tissue is l c = 25.36 µm and l c = 66.81 µm, respectively. Furthermore, the magnitude of the required shear force acting on fibril interface to break a cross-linked fibril in the BHV tissue is shown to be 38 µN, while the required interfacial force to break the bonds between the fibril and the surrounding extracellular matrix is 31 µN. Direct correlations are underpinned between these values and the ultimate failure strength and the failure mode of the BHV tissue compared with the natural AV, and are verified against the existing experimental data. The analyses presented in this paper explain the role of fibril interface shear and critical length in regulating the biomechanics of the structural failure of the BHVs, for the first time. This insight facilitates further understanding into the underlying causes of the structural degeneration of the BHVs in vivo.
KeywordsFibril Aortic Valve Collagen Fibril Critical Length Aortic Valve Leaflet
- 6.Vesely I, Barber JE, Ratliff NB. Tissue damage and calcification may be indeoendent mechanisms of bioprosthetic heart valve failure. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10(4):471–7.Google Scholar
- 7.Sacks MS. The biomechanical effects of fatigue on the porcine bioprosthetic heart valve. J Long Term Eff Med Implant. 2001;11(3–4):231–47.Google Scholar
- 32.Leeson-Dietrich J, Boughner D, Vesely I. Porcine pulmonary and aortic valves: a comparison of their tensile viscoelastic properties at physiological strain rates. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(1):88–94.Google Scholar
- 33.Thubrikar M, Aouad J, Nolan SP. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro mechanical properties of aortic valve leaflets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92(1):29–36.Google Scholar