Skip to main content
Log in

Microgravity as a means to incorporate HepG2 aggregates in polysaccharide–protein hybrid scaffold

  • Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tissue culture under microgravity provides a venue which promotes cell–cell association while avoiding the detrimental effects of high shear stress. Hepatocytes cultured on carriers or entrapped within matrices under simulated microgravity conditions showed improved cell function and proliferation. In the present study, a new approach was adopted where a non-cell adherent scaffold was incorporated with hepatospheroids (HepG2) under microgravity. Gum arabic (GA) was cross-linked with gelatin (GA-Gel) and collagen (GA-Col) to prepare non-cell adherent scaffolds. Microgravity experiments with GA-Gel and GA-Col indicated that GA-Col is a better substrate compared to GA-Gel. Microgravity experiments of GA-Col scaffolds with HepG2 cells confirmed that the non-adherent surface with porous architecture can incorporate hepatocyte spheroids and maintain liver specific functions. Albumin and urea synthesis of hepatocytes was sustained up to 6 days under microgravity conditions in the presence of GA-Col scaffold. This new approach of using non-cell adherent matrix and microgravity environment for developing biological substitutes will be beneficial in tissue engineering, bioartificial liver devices and in vitro safety assessment of drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tilles AW, Berthiaume F, Yarmush ML, Tompkins RG, Toner M. Bioengineering of liver assist devices. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:686–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai ZH, Shi ZQ, O’Shea GM, Sun AM. Microencapsulated hepatocytes for bioartificial liver support. Artif Organs. 1988;12:388–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miura Y, Akimoto T, Kanazawa H, Yagi K. Synthesis and secretion of protein by hepatocytes entrapped within calcium alginate. Artif Organs. 1986;10:460–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gion T, Shimada M, Shirabe K, Nakazawa K, Ijima H, Matsushita T, Funatsu K, Sugimachi K. Evaluation of a hybrid artificial liver using a polyurethane foam packed-bed culture system in dogs. J Surg Res. 1999;82:131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shito M, Tilles AW, Tompkins RG, Yarmush ML, Toner M. Efficacy of an extracorporeal flat-plate bioartificial liver in treating fulminant hepatic failure. J Surg Res. 2003;111:53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Uchino J, Tsuburaya T, Kumagai F, Hase T, Hamada T, Komai T, Funatsu A, Hashimura E, Nakamura K, Kon T. A hybrid bioartificial liver composed of multiplated hepatocyte monolayers. ASAIO Trans. 1988;34:972–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu Q, Sun X, Qiu Y, Zhang H, Ding Y. The optimal hepatocyte density for a hollow-fiber bioartificial liver. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2004;34:87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Powers MJ, Janigian DM, Wack KE, Baker CS, Stolz DB, Griffith LG. Functional behavior of primary rat liver cells in a three-dimensional perfused microarray bioreactor. Tissue Eng. 2002;8:499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tostoes RM, Leite SB, Miranda JP, Sousa M, Wang DI, Carrondo MJ, Alves PM. Perfusion of 3D encapsulated hepatocytes–a synergistic effect enhancing long-term functionality in bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:41–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang YJ, Li MD, Wang YM, Nie QH, Chen GZ. Experimental study of bioartificial liver with cultured human liver cells. World J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:135–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao Y, Xu XP, Hu HZ, Yang JZ. Cultivation of human liver cell lines with microcarriers acting as biological materials of bioartificial liver. World J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:221–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dvir-Ginzberg M, Gamlieli-Bonshtein I, Agbaria R, Cohen S. Liver tissue engineering within alginate scaffolds: effects of cell-seeding density on hepatocyte viability, morphology, and function. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:757–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman RM. To do tissue culture in two or three dimensions? That is the question. Stem Cells. 1993;11:105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Unsworthand BR, Lelkes PI. Growing tissues in microgravity. Nat Med. 1998;4:901–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwarz RP, Goodwin TJ, Wolf DA. Cell culture for three-dimensional modeling in rotating-wall vessels: an application of simulated microgravity. J Tissue Cult Methods. 1992;14:51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Freedand LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Cultivation of cell-polymer tissue constructs in simulated microgravity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;46:306–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishikawa M, Sekine K, Okamura A, Zheng YW, Ueno Y, Koike N, Tanaka J, Taniguchi H. Reconstitution of hepatic tissue architectures from fetal liver cells obtained from a three-dimensional culture with a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111:711–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Balakrishnanand B, Jayakrishnan A. Self-cross-linking biopolymers as injectable in situ forming biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3941–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Balakrishnan B, Mohanty M, Umashankar P, Jayakrishnan A. Evaluation of an in situ forming hydrogel wound dressing based on oxidized alginate and gelatin. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarika P, Cinthya K, Jayakrishnan A, Anilkumar P, James NR. Modified gum arabic cross-linked gelatin scaffold for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng. 2014;43:272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Langerand R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinand Y, Vermette P. Bioreactors for tissue mass culture: design, characterization, and recent advances. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duan X, McLaughlin C, Griffith M, Sheardown H. Biofunctionalization of collagen for improved biological response: scaffolds for corneal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28:78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Clement JQ, Lacy SM, Wilson BL. Genome-wide gene expression profiling of microgravity effect on human liver cells. J Gravit Physiol. 2007;14:P121–2.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miyake M, Yamasaki M, Katahira K, Waki H, Katsuda S, Ijiri K, Shimizu T. Effects of the spaceflight on organ-development in the neonatal rats: results in the Neurolab (STS-90). Biol Sci Space. 2002;16:209–10.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Macho L, Fickova M, Nemeth S, Svabova E, Serova L, Popova I. The effect of space flight on the board of the satellite Cosmos 2044 on plasma hormone levels and liver enzyme activities of rats. Acta Astronaut. 1991;24:329–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Freedand LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Spaceflight bioreactor studies of cells and tissues. Adv Space Biol Med. 2002;8:177–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson LJ, Walker SW, Hayes PC, Plevris JN. Low-shear modelled microgravity environment maintains morphology and differentiated functionality of primary porcine hepatocyte cultures. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;192:125–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Landry J, Bernier D, Ouellet C, Goyette R, Marceau N. Spheroidal aggregate culture of rat liver cells: histotypic reorganization, biomatrix deposition, and maintenance of functional activities. J Cell Biol. 1985;101:914–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong JZ, Sarrazin S, Cassio D, Gauthier F, Alvarez F. Application of spheroid culture to human hepatocytes and maintenance of their differentiation. Biol Cell. 1994;81:77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khaoustov VI, Darlington GJ, Soriano HE, Krishnan B, Risin D, Pellis NR, Yoffe B. Induction of three-dimensional assembly of human liver cells by simulated microgravity. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1999;35:501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dabos KJ, Nelson LJ, Bradnock TJ, Parkinson JA, Sadler IH, Hayes PC, Plevris JN. The simulated microgravity environment maintains key metabolic functions and promotes aggregation of primary porcine hepatocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1526:119–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Coward SM, Selden C, Mantalaris A, Hodgson HJ. Proliferation rates of HepG2 cells encapsulated in alginate are increased in a microgravity environment compared with static cultures. Artif Organs. 2005;29:152–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Z, Zhou HC, Li ZG, Pan MX, Wang Z, Gao Y. Microgravity culture of hepatocytes on cellulose/gelatin macroporous microcarrier. J South Med Univ. 2010;30:704–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank The Director, IIST for the financial support and Director, SCTIMST for the facilities provided.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nirmala Rachel James or P. R. Anilkumar.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 241 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarika, P.R., James, N.R., Anilkumar, P.R. et al. Microgravity as a means to incorporate HepG2 aggregates in polysaccharide–protein hybrid scaffold. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 27, 27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5638-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5638-5

Keywords

Navigation