Skip to main content
Log in

The grafting of a thin layer of poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) onto poly(ε-caprolactone) surface can enhance fibroblast behavior

  • Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) (pNaSS) was grafted onto poly(ε-caprolatone) (PCL) surfaces via ozonation and graft polymerization. The effect of ozonation and polymerization time, as well as the Mohr’s salt concentration in the grafting solution, on the degree of grafting was investigated. The degree of grafting was determined through toluidine blue staining. The surface chemical change was characterized by attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The result demonstrated that the grafting did not induce any degradation of PCL, and that pNaSS was grafted onto PCL as a thin and covalently stable layer. Furthermore, the modified PCL surface reveals a significant increase in the metabolic activity of fibroblastic cells, as well as a better cell spreading with higher adhesion strength. Consequently, bioactivity of PCL is greatly enhanced by immobilizing a thin layer of pNaSS onto its surface. The grafting of pNaSS is a promising approach to increase the bioactivity of PCL-based materials used in tissue engineering applications, such as ligament reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goddard JM, Hotchkiss JH. Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:698–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan G, Mooney DJ. New materials for tissue engineering: towards greater control over the biological response. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:382–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tessmar JK, Göpferich AM. Matrices and scaffolds for protein delivery in tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2007;59:274–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rohman G, Baker SC, Cameron NR, Southgate JJ. Heparin functionalization of porous PLGA scaffolds for controlled, biologically relevant delivery of growth factors for soft tissue engineering. Mater Chem. 2009;19:9265–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald PF, Lyons JG, Geever LM, Higginbotham CL. In vitro degradation and drug release from polymer blends based on poly(dl-lactide), poly(l-lactide-glycolide) and poly(ε-caprolactone). J Mater Sci. 2010;45:1284–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eskin SG, Horbett TA, McIntire LV, Mitchell RN, Ratner BD, Schoen FJ, Yee A. Some background concepts. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 237–91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li R, Wang H, Wang W, Ye Y. Gamma-ray co-irradiation induced graft polymerization of NVP and SSS onto polypropylene non-woven fabric and its blood compatibility. Radiat Phys Chem. 2013;91:132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kishida A, Iwata H, Tamada Y, Ikada Y. Cell behaviour on polymer surfaces grafted with non-ionic and ionic monomer. Biomaterials. 1991;12:786–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JH, Lee JW, Khangt G, Lee HB. Interaction of cells on chargeable functional group gradient surfaces. Biomaterials. 1997;18:351–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavon-Djavid G, Gamble LJ, Ciobanu M, Gueguen V, Castner DG, Migonney V. Bioactive PET fibers and fabrics: grafting, chemical characterization and biological assessment. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:3317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Viateau V, Zhou J, Guérard S, Manassero M, Thourot M, Anagnostou F, Mitton D, Brulez B, Migonney V. Ligart: synthetic « bioactive » and « biointegrable » ligament allowing a rapid recovery of patients: chemical grafting, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, animal experiments, preclinical study. IRBM. 2011;32:118–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oughlis S, Lessim S, Changotade S, Bollotte F, Poirier F, Helary G, Lataillade JJ, Migonney V, Lutomski D. Development of proteomic tools to study protein adsorption on a biomaterial titanium grafted with poly(sodium styrene sulfonate). J Chromatogr B. 2011;879:3681–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Helary G, Noirclere F, Mayingi J, Migonney V. A new approach to graft bioactive polymer on titanium implants: improvement of MG 63 cell differentiation onto this coating. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:124–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oughlis S, Lessim S, Changotade S, Poirier F, Bollotte F, Peltzer J, Felgueiras H, Migonney V, Lataillade JJ, Lutomski D. The osteogenic differentiation improvement of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium grafted with polyNaSS bioactive polymer. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:582–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zorn G, Baio JE, Weidner T, Migonney V, Castner DG. Characterization of poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) thin films grafted from functionalized titanium surfaces. Langmuir. 2011;27:13104–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaquette C, Viateau V, Guérard S, Anagnostou F, Manassero M, Castner DG, Migonney V. The effect of polystyrene sodium sulfonate grafting on polyethylene terephthalate artificial ligaments on in vitro mineralisation and in vivo bone tissue integration. Biomaterials. 2013;34:7048–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasef MM, Saidi H, Dahlan KZM. Kinetic investigations of graft copolymerization of sodium styrene sulfonate onto electron beam irradiated poly(vinylidene fluoride) films. Radiat Phys Chem. 2011;80:66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huot S, Rohman G, Riffault M, Pinzano A, Grossin L, Migonney V. Increasing the bioactivity of elastomeric poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Bio-Med Mater Eng. 2013;23:281–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Djaker N, Brustlein S, Rohman G, Huot S, Lamy de la Chapelle M, Migonney V. Characterization of a synthetic bioactive polymer by nonlinear optical microscopy. Biomed. Opt Express. 2014;5:149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. J Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35:1217–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang K, Jesse S, Wang S. Banded spherulitic morphology in blends of poly(propylene fumarate) and poly(ε-caprolactone) and interaction with MC3T3-E1 cells. Macromol Chem Phys. 2012;213:1239–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suh H, Hwang Y-S, Lee J-E, Han CD, Park J-C. Behavior of osteoblasts on a type I atelocollagen grafted ozone oxidized poly l-lactic acid membrane. Biomaterials. 2001;22:219–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kweon HY, Yoo MK, Park IK, Kim TH, Lee HC, Lee HS, Oh JS, Akaike T, Cho CS. A novel degradable polycaprolactone networks for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:801–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker SC, Rohman G, Southgate J, Cameron NR. The relationship between the mechanical properties and cell behaviour on PLGA and PCL scaffolds for bladder tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang JC, Jablonsky MJ, Mays JW. NMR and FT-IR studies of sulfonated styrene-based homopolymers and copolymers. Polymer. 2002;43:5125–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Razumovskii SD, Kefeli AA, Zaikov GE. Degradation of polymers in reactive gases. Eur Polym J. 1971;7:275–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kulik EA, Ivanchenko M, Kato K, Sano S, Ikada Y. Peroxide generation and decomposition on polymer surface. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem. 1995;33:323–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen J, Nho Y-C, Park J-S. Grafting polymerization of acrylic acid onto preirradiated polypropylene fabric. Radiat Phys Chem. 1998;52:201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ohrlander M, Wirsen A, Albertsson A-C. The grafting of acrylamide onto poly(ε-caprolactone) and poly(1,5-dioxepan-2-one) using electron beam preirradiation. I. Influence of dose and Mohr’s salt for the grafting onto poly(ε-caprolactone). J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem. 1999;37:1643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Natu MV, de Sousa HC, Gil MH. Influence of polymer processing technique on long term degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone) constructs. Polym Deg Stab. 2013;98:44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tamada Y, Ikada Y. Effect of preadsorbed proteins on cell adhesion to polymer surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1993;155:334–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kowalczyńska HM, Nowak-Wyrzykowska M, Dobkowski J, Kołos R, Kamiński J, Makowska-Cynka A, Marciniak E. Adsorption characteristics of human plasma fibronectin in relationship to cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61:260–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kowalczyńska HM, Nowak-Wyrzykowska M. Modulation of adhesion, spreading and cytoskeleton organization of 3T3 fibroblasts by sulfonic groups present on polymer surfaces. Cell Biol Int. 2003;27:101–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministry of National Education, Research and Technology for the MENRT scholarship granted to Stéphane Huot. The XPS experiments were done at NESAC/Bio, which is funded by grant EB-002027 from the US National Institutes of Health. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Géraldine Rohman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rohman, G., Huot, S., Vilas-Boas, M. et al. The grafting of a thin layer of poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) onto poly(ε-caprolactone) surface can enhance fibroblast behavior. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 26, 206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5539-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5539-7

Keywords

Navigation