Technique to optimize magnetic response of gelatin coated magnetic nanoparticles

  • Nidhi Parikh
  • Kinnari Parekh
Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization Original Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biomaterials Synthesis and Characterization


The paper describes the results of optimization of magnetic response for highly stable bio-functionalize magnetic nanoparticles dispersion. Concentration of gelatin during in situ co-precipitation synthesis was varied from 8, 23 and 48 mg/mL to optimize magnetic properties. This variation results in a change in crystallite size from 10.3 to 7.8 ± 0.1 nm. TEM measurement of G3 sample shows highly crystalline spherical nanoparticles with a mean diameter of 7.2 ± 0.2 nm and diameter distribution (σ) of 0.27. FTIR spectra shows a shift of 22 cm−1 at C=O stretching with absence of N–H stretching confirming the chemical binding of gelatin on magnetic nanoparticles. The concept of lone pair electron of the amide group explains the mechanism of binding. TGA shows 32.8–25.2 % weight loss at 350 °C temperature substantiating decomposition of chemically bind gelatin. The magnetic response shows that for 8 mg/mL concentration of gelatin, the initial susceptibility and saturation magnetization is the maximum. The cytotoxicity of G3 sample was assessed in Normal Rat Kidney Epithelial Cells (NRK Line) by MTT assay. Results show an increase in viability for all concentrations, the indicative probability of a stimulating action of these particles in the nontoxic range. This shows the potential of this technique for biological applications as the coated particles are (i) superparamagnetic (ii) highly stable in physiological media (iii) possibility of attaching other drug with free functional group of gelatin and (iv) non-toxic.


Gelatin Saturation Magnetization Magnetic Nanoparticles Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Magnetic Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Authors would like to thank DST, Govt. of India for providing financial support to NP under technology development project No. 161-G.


  1. 1.
    Pankhurst QA, Connolly J, Jones SK, Dobson J. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J Phys D. 2003;36:R167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dobson J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Drug Dev Res. 2006;67:55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3995–4021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arruebo M, Fernández-Pacheco R, Ricardo Ibarra M, Santamaría J. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nanotoday. 2007;2:22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krishnan Kannan M. Biomedical nanomagnetics: a spin through possibilities in imaging, diagnostics, and therapy. IEEE Trans Magn. 2010;46:2523–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar RV, Koltypin Y, Cohen YS, Cohen Y, Aurbach D, Palchik O, Felner I, Gedanken A. Preparation of amorphous magnetite nanoparticles embedded in polyvinyl alcohol using ultrasound radiation. J Mater Chem. 2000;10:1125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bychkova AV, Sorokina ON, Rosenfeld MA, Kovarski AL. Multifunctional biocompatible coatings on magnetic nanoparticles. Russ Chem Rev. 2012;81:1026–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guannan W, Xingguang S. The synthesis and bio-applications of magnetic and fluorescent bifunctional composite nanoparticles. Analyst. 2011;136:1783–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bao G, Mitragotri S, Tong S. Multifunctional nanoparticles for drug delivery and molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;15:253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koffie RM, Farrar CT, Saidi L, William CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL. Nanoparticles enhance brain delivery of blood-brain barrier-impermeable probes for in vivo optical and magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;46:18837–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu H, Yan F, Monson EE, Kopelman R. Room‐temperature preparation and characterization of poly (ethylene glycol)‐coated silica nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;66(4):870–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sell SA, Wolfe PS, Garg K, McCool JM, Rodriguez IA, Bowlin GL. The use of natural polymers in tissue engineering: a focus on electrospun extracellular matrix analogues. Polymers. 2010;2:522–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Samal SK, Dash M, Vlierberghe SV, Kalpan DL, Chiellini E, van Blitterswijk C, Moroni L, Dubreul P. Cationic polymers and their therapeutic potential. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:7147–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordente N, Respaud M, Senocq F, Casanove M-J, Amiens C, Chaudret B. Synthesis and magnetic properties of nickel nanorods. Nano Lett. 2001;1(10):565–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaihre B, Khil MS, Kang HK, Kim HY. Bioactivity of gelatin coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: in vitro evaluation. J Mater Sci. 2009;20:573–81.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Young S, Wong M, Tabata Y, Mikos AG. Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. J Control Release. 2005;109:256–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ziv O, Avtailion R, Margel S. Immunogenicity of bioactive magnetic nanoparticles: natural and acquired antibodies. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2008;85:1011–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen G, Qiao C, Wang Y, Yao J. Synthesis of magnetic gelatin and its adsorption property for Cr (VI). Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53(40):15576–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Allouche J, Chanéac C, Brayner R, Boissière M, Coradin T. Design of magnetic gelatine/silica nanocomposites by nanoemulsification: encapsulation versus in situ growth of iron oxide colloids. Nanomaterials. 2014;4:612–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gaihre B, Khil MS, Ko JA, Kim HY. Techniques of controlling hydrodynamic size of ferrofluid of gelatin-coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Sci. 2008;43:6881–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giorgio B. Hysteresis in magnetism, for physicist, material scientists and engineers. San Diego: Academy Press; 1998. p. 317.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parekh Kinnari. Effect of preparative conditions on magnetic properties of CoFe (2) O (4) nanoparticles. Indian J Pure Appl Phys. 2010;48:581.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiles D. Introduction to magnetism and magnetic materials. London: Chapman & Hall publisher; 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dr. K C Patel R & D CenterCharotar University of Science & TechnologyChangaIndia

Personalised recommendations