Advertisement

In vivo degradation of orthodontic miniscrew implants: surface analysis of as-received and retrieved specimens

  • Masahiro Iijima
  • Takeshi Muguruma
  • Masahiro Kawaguchi
  • Yoshitaka Yasuda
  • Itaru Mizoguchi
Biocompatibility Studies
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biocompatibility Studies

Abstract

This study investigated in vivo degradation of Ti–6Al–4V alloy miniscrew implants. Miniscrew implants were placed in patients, and the surfaces were studied upon retrieval by scanning electron microscopy, microscale X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, elastic recoil detection analysis and nanoindentation testing. Bone-like structures were formed on the retrieved specimens. The hardness and elastic modulus of the surfaces of the retrieved specimens were significantly lower than the as-received specimens, although no statistically significant differences were observed for the hardness and elastic modulus in the bulk region. Thick organic over-layer containing carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen, with the thickness greater than 50 nm, covered the retrieved specimens, and higher concentrations of hydrogen were detected in the retrieved specimens compared with the as-received specimens. Minimal degradation of the bulk mechanical properties of miniscrew implants was observed after clinical use, although precipitation of bone-like structures, formation of a carbonaceous contamination layer, and hydrogen absorption were observed on the surfaces of miniscrew implants.

Keywords

Titanium Alloy Hydrogen Absorption Hydrogen Embrittlement Hydrogen Fluoride Elastic Recoil Detection Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by the Research Project of the Research Institute of Personalized Health Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido.

References

  1. 1.
    Branemark PI, Aspegren K, Breine U. Microcirculatory studies in man by high resolution vital microscopy. Angiology. 1964;15:329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:763–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:373–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(Supp 1):S68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1351–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deguchi T, Yabuuchi T, Hasegawa M, Garetto LP, Roberts WE, Takano-Yamamoto T. Histomorphometric evaluation of cortical bone thickness surrounding miniscrew for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Inplant Dent Res. 2009;13:197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchter A, Wiechmann D, Koerdt S, Wiesmann HP, Piffko J, Meyer U. Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2005;16:473–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yokoyama K, kaneko K, Moroyama K, Asaoka K, Sakai J, Nagumo M. Hydrogen embrittlement of Ni–Ti superelastic alloy in fluoride solution. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;65A:182–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodrigues DC, Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL. In vivo severe corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement of retrieved modular body titanium alloy hip-implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:206–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zinelis S, Eliades T, Pandis N, Eliades G, Bourauel C. Why do nickel-titanium archwires fracture intraorally? Fractograpic analysis and failure mechanism of in vivo fractured wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:84–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Hirsch JM, Thomsen P. Surface analysis of failed oral titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48:559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eliades T, Zinelis S, Papadopoulos MA, Eliades G. Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:10.e1–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bae SM, Kyung HM. Mandibular molar intrusion with miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2006;40:107–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishihara Y, Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Balam TA, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Indirect usage of miniscrew anchorage to intrude overerupted mandibular incisors in a class II patient with a deep overbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:S113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen YJ, Chen YH, Lin LD, Yao CC. Removal torque of miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage-a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:283–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA, Okayama M, Yuasa T, Mizoguchi I. Torsional properties and microstructures of mini-screw implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:333.e1–6.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoeppner DW, Chandrasekaran V. Fretting in orthopedic implants: a review. Wear. 1994;173:189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiro Iijima
    • 1
  • Takeshi Muguruma
    • 1
  • Masahiro Kawaguchi
    • 2
  • Yoshitaka Yasuda
    • 3
  • Itaru Mizoguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Department of Oral Growth and Development School of DentistryHealth Sciences University of HokkaidoIshikari-TobetsuJapan
  2. 2.Commercialization Support Department Advanced Analysis and Development SectorTokyo Metropolitan Industrial Technology Research InstituteTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Yasuda Orthodontic OfficeNishinomiya, HyogoJapan

Personalised recommendations