Hancornia speciosa latex for biomedical applications: physical and chemical properties, biocompatibility assessment and angiogenic activity
- 361 Downloads
The latex obtained from Hancornia speciosa is used in folk medicine for treatment of several diseases, such as acne, warts, diabetes, gastritis and inflammation. In this work, we describe the biocompatibility assessment and angiogenic properties of H. speciosa latex and its potential application in medicine. The physical–chemical characterization was carried out following different methodologies (CHN elemental analyses; thermogravimetric analyses and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy). The biocompatibility was evaluated through cytotoxicity and genotoxicity tests in fibroblast mouse cells and the angiogenic properties were evaluated using the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay model. The physical–chemical results showed that the structure of Hancornia speciosa latex biomembrane is very similar to that of Hevea brasiliensis (commercially available product). Moreover, the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays showed that H. speciosa latex is biocompatible with life systems and can be a good biomaterial for medical applications. The CAM test showed the efficient ability of H. speciosa latex in neovascularization of tissues. The histological analysis was in accordance with the results obtained in the CAM assay. Our data indicate that the latex obtained from H. speciosa and eluted in water showed significant angiogenic activity without any cytotoxic or genotoxic effects on life systems. The same did not occur with H. speciosa latex stabilized with ammonia. Addition of ammonia does not have significant effects on the structure of biomembranes, but showed a smaller cell survival and a significant genotoxicity effect. This study contributes to the understanding of the potentialities of H. speciosa latex as a source of new phytomedicines.
KeywordsNatural Rubber Angiogenic Activity Chorioallantoic Membrane Natural Rubber Latex Mouse Fibroblast Cell
The authors acknowledge the Brazilian funding agencies MCT/CNPq, FNDCT, CAPES, FINEP, FAPEG, FAPESP and FUNAPEP. Revision of the English language text was carried out by Universidade Estadual de Goiás (UEG).
- 1.Bannerman RH. Traditional medicine in modern health care. World Health Forum. 1982;3:8–13.Google Scholar
- 7.Frade MA, Assis RV, Coutinho-Netto J, Andrade TA, Foss NT. The vegetal biomembrane in the healing of chronic venous ulcers. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87(1):45–51.Google Scholar
- 9.Martins R, Kinoshita AMO, Carvalho NTA, Guimarães SAC. Comparative study of bone response guides tissue regeneration technique—macroscopic evaluation, Part 1. Full Densitry Sci. 2010;1(3):224–30.Google Scholar
- 19.Wagner B, Krebitz M, Buck D, Niggemann B, Yeang HY, Han KH, Scheiner O, Breiteneder H. Cloning, expression, and characterization of recombinant Hev b 3, a Hevea brasiliensis protein associated with latex allergy in patients with spina bifida. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104:1084–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ritter MR, Sobierajski GR, Schenkel EP, Mentz LA. Plantas usadas como medicinais no município de Ipê, RS, Brasil. Revista Brasileira Framacognosia. 2002;12:51–62.Google Scholar
- 31.Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistic. Sistema de Recuperação automática. http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 23 May 2010.
- 39.Parente LML, Andrade MA, Brito LAB, Moura VMBD, Miguel MP, Lino-Junior RS, Tresvenzol LFM, Paula JR, Paulo NM. Angiogenic activity of Calendula officialis flowers L. in rats. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira. 2011;26(1):19–24.Google Scholar
- 41.ISO 10.993-3: International standard: Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 3. Tests for citotoxicity: in vitro methods ISO 10993-3, 1992.Google Scholar
- 42.ISO 10.993-5: International standard: Biological evaluation of medical devices - part 5. Tests for citotoxicity: in vitro methods ISO 10993-5, 1992.Google Scholar
- 44.Dulngali S, Fah CS. Preservative system for field latex. Kuala Lumpur: RRIM, Universiti Malaya, Malaya; 1980.Google Scholar
- 47.Alam TM, Celina M, Assink RA, Clough RL, Gillen KT. 17O NMR investigation of oxidative degradation in polymers under g-irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem. 2001;60:121–7.Google Scholar
- 50.Wiegand C, Hipler UC. Methods for measurement of cell and tissue compatibility including tissue regeneration processes. Krankenaushygiene Interdisziplinar. 2008;3(1):1863–5245.Google Scholar
- 53.Jackson JR, Seed MP, Kircher CH, Willoughby DA, Winkler JD. The codependence of angiogenesis and chronic inflammation. FASEB J. 1997;11(6):457–65.Google Scholar
- 54.Folkman J, Brem H. Angiogenesis and inflammation. In: Gallin JI, Goldstein IM, Snyderman R, editors. Inflammation: basic principles and clinical correlates. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1992. p. 821–39.Google Scholar