Effect of novel chitosan-fluoroaluminosilicate resin modified glass ionomer cement supplemented with translationally controlled tumor protein on pulp cells

  • Nattaporn Wanachottrakul
  • Wilaiwan Chotigeat
  • Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat


Dental materials that can promote cell proliferation and function is required for regenerative pulp therapy. Resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), a broadly used liner or restorative material, can cause apoptosis to pulp cells mainly due to HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), the released residual monomer. Recent studies found that chitosan and albumin could promote release of protein in GIC while translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) has an anti-apoptotic activity against HEMA. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of chitosan and albumin modified RMGIC (Exp-RMGIC) supplemented with TCTP on pulp cell viability and mineralization. Exp-RMGIC+TCTP was composed of RMGIC powder incorporated with 15 % of chitosan, 5 % albumin and supplemented with TCTP mixed with the same liquid components of RMGIC. The effect of each specimen on pulp cells was examined using the Transwell plate. From the MTT assay, Exp-RMGIC+TCTP had the highest percentages of viable cells (P < 0.05) at both 24 and 74 h. Flow cytometry revealed that, after 24 h, Exp-RMGIC+TCTP gave the lowest percentages of apoptotic cells compared to other groups. There was no difference in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity among different formula of the specimens, while cells cultured in media with TCTP had higher ALP activity. Von Kossa staining revealed that RMGIC+TCTP, and Exp-RMGIC+TCTP had higher percentages of calcium deposit area compared to those without TCTP. It was concluded that Exp-RMGIC supplemented with TCTP had less cytotoxicity than RMGIC and can protect cells from apoptosis better than RMGIC supplemented with TCTP.


Chitosan HEMA Translationally Control Tumor Protein Glass Ionomer Cement Dentinal Tubule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission. University Grant No. DEN 511990007s, DEN 540013s and the Postdoctoral Fellowship from Prince of Songkla University, as well as the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program Grant No. PHD/0152/2548 to Nattaporn Wanachottrakul.


  1. 1.
    McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:587–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li J, von Beetzen M, Sundstrom F. Strength and setting behavior of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53:311–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paranjpe A, Bordador LC, Wang MY, Hume WR, Jewett A. Resin monomer 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) is a potent inducer of apoptotic cell death in human and mouse cells. J Dent Res. 2005;84:172–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samuelsen JT, Dahl JE, Karlsson S, Morisbak E, Becher R. Apoptosis induced by the monomers HEMA and TEGDMA involves formation of ROS and differential activation of the MAP-kinases p38. JNK and ERK. Dent Mater. 2007;23:34–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walther UI, Siagian II, Walther SC, Reichl FX, Hickel R. Antioxidative vitamins decrease cytotoxicity of HEMA and TEGDMA in cultured cell lines. Arch Oral Biol. 2004;49:125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spagnuolo G, D’Anto V, Cosentino C, Schmalz G, Schweikl H, Rengo S. Effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine on ROS production and cell death caused by HEMA in human primary gingival fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1803–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paranjpe A, Cacalano NA, Hume WR, Jewett A. N-acetylcysteine protects dental pulp stromal cells from HEMA-induced apoptosis by inducing differentiation of the cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;43:1394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ikemura K, Ichizawa K, Endo T. Design of a new self-etching HEMA-free adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:558–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minamikawa H, Yamada M, Iwasa F, Ueno T, Deyama Y, Suzuki K, et al. Amino acid derivative-mediated detoxification and functionalization of dual cure dental restorative material for dental pulp cell mineralization. Biomaterials. 2010;31:7213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wanachottrakul N, Chotigeat W, Kedjarune-Leggat U. Translationally controlled tumor protein against apoptosis from 2-hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate in human dental pulp cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22:1479–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bommer UA, Borovjagin AV, Greagg MA, Jeffrey IW, Russell P, Laing KG, et al. The mRNA of the translationally controlled tumor protein P23/TCTP is a highly structured RNA, which activates the dsRNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. RNA. 2002;8:478–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teshima S, Rokutan K, Nikawa T, Kishi K. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates synthesis and secretion of a mouse homolog of a human IgE-dependent histamine-releasing factor by macrophages in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. 1998;161:6356–66.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bommer UA, Heng C, Perrin A, Dash P, Lobov S, Elia A, et al. Roles of the translationally controlled tumour protein (TCTP) and the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR, in cellular stress responses. Oncogene. 2010;29:763–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagano-Ito M, Ichikawa S. Biological effects of Mammalian translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) on cell death, proliferation, and tumorigenesis. Biochem Res Int. 2012;2012:204960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rid R, Onder K, Trost A, Bauer J, Hintner H, Ritter M, et al. H2O2-dependent translocation of TCTP into the nucleus enables its interaction with VDR in human keratinocytes: TCTP as a further module in calcitriol signalling. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;118:29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagano-Ito M, Banba A, Ichikawa S. Functional cloning of genes that suppress oxidative stress-induced cell death: TCTP prevents hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death. FEBS Lett. 2009;583:1363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susini L, Besse S, Duflaut D, Lespagnol A, Beekman C, Fiucci G, et al. TCTP protects from apoptotic cell death by antagonizing bax function. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rho SB, Lee JH, Park MS, Byun HJ, Kang S, Seo SS, et al. Anti-apoptotic protein TCTP controls the stability of the tumor suppressor p53. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The biocompatibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1702–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar MN, Muzzarelli RA, Muzzarelli C, Sashiwa H, Domb AJ. Chitosan chemistry and pharmaceutical perspectives. Chem Rev. 2004;104:6017–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singla AK, Chawla M. Chitosan: some pharmaceutical and biological aspects–an update. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2001;53:1047–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chung YC, Chen CY. Antibacterial characteristics and activity of acid-soluble chitosan. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:2806–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Francesko A, Tzanov T. Chitin, chitosan and derivatives for wound healing and tissue engineering. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2011;125:1–27.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shrestha A, Kishen A. The effect of tissue inhibitors on the antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles and photodynamic therapy. J Endod. 2012;38:1275–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang X, Han G, Pang X, Fan M. Chitosan/collagen scaffold containing bone morphogenetic protein-7 DNA supports dental pulp stem cell differentiation in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu Y, Du Y. Effect of molecular structure of chitosan on protein delivery properties of chitosan nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2003;250:215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Limapornvanich A, Jitpukdeebodintra S, Hengtrakool C, Kedjarune-Leggat U. Bovine serum albumin release from novel chitosan-fluoro-aluminosilicate glass ionomer cement: stability and cytotoxicity studies. J Dent. 2009;37:686–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rakkiettiwong N, Hengtrakool C, Thammasitboon K, Kedjarune-Leggat U. Effect of novel chitosan-fluoroaluminosilicate glass ionomer cement with added transforming growth factor beta-1 on pulp cells. J Endod. 2011;37:367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pavasant P, Yongchaitrakul T, Pattamapun K, Arksornnukit M. The synergistic effect of TGF-beta and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on SPARC synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity in human pulp fibroblasts. Arch Oral Biol. 2003;48:717–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nakamura H, Saruwatari L, Aita H, Takeuchi K, Ogawa T. Molecular and biomechanical characterization of mineralized tissue by dental pulp cells on titanium. J Dent Res. 2005;84:515–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Imazato S, Horikawa D, Nishida M, Ebisu S. Effects of monomers eluted from dental resin restoratives on osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2009;88:378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pawlowska E, Poplawski T, Ksiazek D, Szczepanska J, Blasiak J. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Mutat Res. 2010;696:122–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rathke A, Alt A, Gambin N, Haller B. Dentin diffusion of HEMA released from etch-and-rinse and self-etch bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007;115:510–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krifka S, Hiller KA, Spagnuolo G, Jewett A, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. The influence of glutathione on redox regulation by antioxidant proteins and apoptosis in macrophages exposed to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Biomaterials. 2012;33:5177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gnanasekar M, Ramaswamy K. Translationally controlled tumor protein of Brugia malayi functions as an antioxidant protein. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:1533–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Szczepanska J, Poplawski T, Synowiec E, Pawlowska E, Chojnacki CJ, Chojnacki J, et al. 2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a tooth restoration component, exerts its genotoxic effects in human gingival fibroblasts trough methacrylic acid, an immediate product of its degradation. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(2):1561–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nattaporn Wanachottrakul
    • 1
  • Wilaiwan Chotigeat
    • 2
  • Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oral Biology and Occlusion, Faculty of DentistryPrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of SciencePrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand

Personalised recommendations