Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering fabricated from two different materials by the rapid prototyping technique: PCL versus PLGA
Three dimensional tissue engineered scaffolds for the treatment of critical defect have been usually fabricated by salt leaching or gas forming technique. However, it is not easy for cells to penetrate the scaffolds due to the poor interconnectivity of pores. To overcome these current limitations we utilized a rapid prototyping (RP) technique for fabricating tissue engineered scaffolds to treat critical defects. The RP technique resulted in the uniform distribution and systematic connection of pores, which enabled cells to penetrate the scaffold. Two kinds of materials were used. They were poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(d, l-lactic-glycolic acid) (PLGA), where PCL is known to have longer degradation time than PLGA. In vitro tests supported the biocompatibility of the scaffolds. A 12-week animal study involving various examinations of rabbit tibias such as micro-CT and staining showed that both PCL and PLGA resulted in successful bone regeneration. As expected, PLGA degraded faster than PCL, and consequently the tissues generated in the PLGA group were less dense than those in the PCL group. We concluded that slower degradation is preferable in bone tissue engineering, especially when treating critical defects, as mechanical support is needed until full regeneration has occurred.
KeywordsPolylactic Acid Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold Material Critical Defect PLGA Scaffold
This work was supported by the grants of Technology Innovation Program (10038667, Ministry of Knowledge Economy, ROK) and Priority Research Centers Program (2010-0020224, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology).
- 2.Sachlos E, Czernuszka JT. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work review on the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Cells Mater. 2009;5:29–40.Google Scholar
- 4.Pathiraja AG, Raju A. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater. 2003;5:1–16.Google Scholar
- 21.Flatley TJ, Lynch KL, Benson M. Tissue response to implants of calcium phosphate ceramics in rabbit spine. Clin Orthop. 1983;179:246–52.Google Scholar