Double protein functionalized poly-ε-caprolactone surfaces: in depth ToF–SIMS and XPS characterization
- 429 Downloads
In biomaterial research, great attention has focussed on the immobilization of biomolecules with the aim to increase cell-adhesive properties of materials. Many different strategies can be applied. In previously published work, our group focussed on the treatment of poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) films by an Ar-plasma, followed by the grafting of 2-aminoethyl methacrylate (AEMA) under UV-irradiation. The functional groups introduced, enabled the subsequent covalent immobilisation of gelatin. The obtained coating was finally applied for the physisorption of fibronectin. The successful PCL surface functionalization was preliminary confirmed using XPS, wettability studies, AFM and SEM. In the present article, we report on an in-depth characterization of the materials developed using ToF–SIMS and XPS analysis. The homogeneous AEMA grafting and the subsequent protein coating steps could be confirmed by both XPS and ToF–SIMS. Using ToF–SIMS, it was possible to demonstrate the presence of polymethacrylates on the surface. From peak deconvoluted XPS results (C- and N-peak), the presence of proteins could be confirmed. Using ToF–SIMS, different positive ions, correlating to specific amino-acids could be identified. Importantly, the gelatin and the fibronectin coatings could be qualitatively distinguished. Interestingly for biomedical applications, ethylene oxide sterilization did not affect the surface chemical composition. This research clearly demonstrates the complementarities of XPS and ToF–SIMS in biomedical surface modification research.
KeywordsGelatin Polymethacrylates Ethylene Oxide Sterilization Surface Modification Strategy Double Protein
The authors would like to thank Ghent University (UGent, BOF project), the UGent Multidisciplinary Research Partnership Nano- and biophotonics (2010-2015) and the Catholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve for financial support. A special thanks to Claude Poleunis for performing ToF–SIMS, to Michel Genet for his support in the XPS interpretation and to Thomas Billiet for the interesting discussions.
- 1.Desmet T, Schacht E, Dubruel P. Rapid prototyping as an elegant production tool for polymeric tissue engineering scaffolds: a review. In: Barnes SJ, Harris LP, editors. Tissue engineering: roles, materials and applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2008; p. 141–189.Google Scholar
- 17.Olah L, Filipczak K, Jaegermann Z, Czigany T, Borbas L, Sosnowski S, Ulanski P, Rosiak JM. Synthesis, structural and mechanical properties of porous polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration based on neat poly(epsilon-caprolactone) calcium carbonate. Polym Adv Technol. 2006;17(11–12):889–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Savarino L, Baldini N, Greco M, Capitani O, Pinna S, Valentini S, Lombardo B, Esposito MT, Pastore L, Ambrosio L, Battista S, Causa F, Zeppetelli S, Guarino V, Netti PA. The performance of poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds in a rabbit femur model with and without autologous stromal cells and BMP4. Biomaterials. 2007;28(20):3101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Yang Q, Xu ZK, Ulbricht M. Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane by the immobilization of dextran. Chem J Chin Univ-Chin. 2005;26(1):189–91.Google Scholar
- 46.Vogel, V. Fibronectin in a surface-adsorbed state. In: Horbett TA, Brash JL, editors. Proteins at interfaces II, fundamentals and applications. Washington: American Chemical Society; 1995.Google Scholar
- 52.Genet M, Dupont-Gillain C, Rouxhet P. XPS analysis of biosystems and biomaterials. In: Matijevi′c E, editor. Medical applications of colloids. New York: Springer; 2008, p. 177–307.Google Scholar
- 53.Briggs D, Surface analysis of polymers by XPS and static SIMS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998, p xiii+198.Google Scholar
- 55.Vickerman JC, Briggs D, Henderson A. The Wiley static SIMS library. Chichester: Wiley; 1996, p. v.Google Scholar