Precision microchannel scaffolds for central and peripheral nervous system repair

  • Daniel Lynam
  • Bridget Bednark
  • Chelsea Peterson
  • David Welker
  • Mingyong Gao
  • Jeffrey S. Sakamoto


In previous studies, we demonstrated the ability to linearly guide axonal regeneration using scaffolds comprised of precision microchannels 2 mm in length. In this work, we report our efforts to augment the manufacturing process to achieve clinically relevant scaffold dimensions in the centimeter-scale range. By selective etching of multi-component fiber bundles, agarose hydrogel scaffolds with highly ordered, close-packed arrays of microchannels, ranging from 172 to 320 μm, were fabricated with overall dimensions approaching clinically relevant length scales. Cross-sectional analyses determined that the maximum microchannel volume per unit volume of scaffold approached 80%, which is nearly twice that compared to our previously reported study. Statistical analyses at various points along the length of the microchannels also show a significant degree of linearity along the entire length of the scaffold. Two types of multi-component fiber bundle templates were evaluated; polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate). The scaffolds consisting of 2 cm long microchannels were fabricated with the poly(methyl methacrylate) fiber-cores exhibited a higher degree of linearity compared to those fabricated using polystyrene fibers. It is believed that the materials process developed in this study is useful for fabricating high aspect ratio microchannels in biocompatible materials with a wide range of geometries for guiding nerve regeneration.


PMMA Propylene Carbonate Average Wall Thickness Agarose Hydrogel Relevant Length Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was supported by the Veterans Administration and the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Mark Tuszynski at the University of California, San Diego for his insightful interaction and assistance with characterizing the in vivo efficacy of the scaffolds described in this study.


  1. 1.
    Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation. One degree of separation: paralysis and spinal cord injury in the United States. Online. Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation; 2009. Available from URL:
  2. 2.
    Archibald SJ, Krarup C, Shefner J, Li ST, Madison RD. A collagen-based nerve guide conduit for peripheral nerve repair: an electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates. J Comp Neurol. 1991;306:685–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu BS. Fabrication and evaluation of a biodegradable proanthocyanidin-crosslinked gelatin conduit in peripheral nerve repair. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;87A:1092–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evans GRD, Brandt K, Widmer MS, Lu L, Meszlenyi RK, Gupta PK, et al. In vivo evaluation of poly(l-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsumoto K, Ohnishi K, Kiyotani T, Sekine T, Ueda H, Nakamura T, et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration across an 80-mm gap bridged by a polyglycolic acid (PGA)-collagen tube filled with laminin-coated collagen fibers: a histological and electrophysiological evaluation of regenerated nerves. Brain Res. 2000;868:315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Widmer M, Gupta P, Lu L, Meszlenyi R, Evans G, Brandt K, et al. Manufacture of porous biodegradable polymer conduits by an extrusion process for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1945–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stokols S, Tuszynski MH. Freeze-dried agarose scaffolds with uniaxial microchannels stimulate and guide linear axonal growth following spinal cord injury. Biomaterials. 2006;27:443–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin BC, Minner EJ, Wiseman SL, Klank RL, Gilbert RJ. Agarose and methylcellulose hydrogel blends for nerve regeneration applications. J Neural Eng. 2008;5:221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sondell M, Lundborg G, Kanje M. Regeneration of the rat sciatic nerve into allografts made acellular through chemical extraction. Brain Res. 1998;795:44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crouzier T, McClendon T, Tosun Z, McFetridge PS. Inverted human umbilical arteries with tunable wall thicknesses for nerve regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89A:818–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang KK, Costas PD, Bryan DJ, Jones DS, Seckel BR. Inside-out vein graft promotes improved nerve regeneration in rats. J Reconstruc Microsurg. 1993;14:608–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heath C, Rutkowski G. The development of bioartificial nerve grafts for peripheral-nerve regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:163–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma PX, Zhang R. Microtubular architecture of biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56:469–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadlock T, Elisseeff J, Langer R, Vacanti J, Cheney M. A tissue-engineered conduit for peripheral nerve repair. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:1081–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stokols S, Sakamoto J, Breckon C, Holt T, Weiss J, Tuszynski MH. Templated agarose scaffolds support linear axonal regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2777–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gros T, Sakamoto S, Blesch A, Havton LA, Tuszynski MH. Regeneration of long-tract axons through sites of spinal cord injury using templated agarose scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6719–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lundborg G, Dahlin LB, Danielsen N, Gelberman RH, Longo FM, Powell HC, Varon S. Nerve regeneration in silicone chambers: influence of gap length and of distal stump components. Exp Neur. 1982;76:361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suzuki Y, Tanihara M, Ohnishi K, Suzuki K. Cat peripheral nerve regeneration across 50 mm gap repaired with a novel nerve guide composed of freeze-dried alginate gel. Neurosci Lett. 1999;259:75–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ansselin A, Fink T, Davey D. Peripheral nerve regeneration through nerve guides seeded with adult Schwann cells. Neuropath Applied Neurobio. 1997;23:387–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kiyotani T, Teramachi M, Takimoto Y. Nerve regeneration across a 25-mm gap bridged by a polyglycolic acid-collagen tube: a histological and electrophysiological evaluation of nerves. Brain Res. 1996;740:66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sinis N, Schaller H, Schulte-Eversum C, Schlosshauer B, Doser M, Dietz K, Rosner H, Muller H, Haerle M. Nerve regeneration across a 2-cm gap in the rat median nerve using a resorbable nerve conduit filled with Schwann Cells. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:1067–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mehrotra S, Lynam D, Maloney R, Pawelec K, Tuszynski MH, Lee I, Chan C, Sakamoto J. Time controlled protein release by layer-by-layer assembled multilayer functionalized agarose hydrogels. Adv Func Mat. 2009;20:247–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flynn L, Dalton PD, Shoichet MS. Fiber templating of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodríguez F, Gomez N, Perego G, Navarro X. Highly permeable polylactide-caprolactone nerve guides enhance peripheral nerve regeneration through long gaps. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plikk P, Malbert S, Albertsson AC. Design of resorbable porous tubular copolyester scaffolds for use in nerve regeneration. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:1259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moore M, Friedman J, Lewellyn E. Multiple-microchannel scaffolds to promote spinal cord axon regeneration. Biomaterials. 2006;27:419–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bender M, Bennett J, Waddell R, Doctor J, Marra K. Multi-channeled biodegradable polymer/CultiSpher composite nerve guides. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1269–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huang, et al. Manufacture of porous polymer nerve conduits through a lyophilizing and wire-heating process. J Biomed Mater Res: Appl Biomater. 2005;74B:659–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wong D, Leveque JC, Brumblay H, Krebsbach P, Hollister S, LaMarca F. Macro-architectures in spinal cord scaffold implants influence regeneration. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:1027–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghosh S, Viana J, Reis R, Mano J. Development of porous lamellar poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds by conventional injection molding process. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:887–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Lynam
    • 1
  • Bridget Bednark
    • 1
  • Chelsea Peterson
    • 1
  • David Welker
    • 2
  • Mingyong Gao
    • 3
  • Jeffrey S. Sakamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceMichigan State University, College of EngineeringEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Paradigm Optics, IncVancouverUSA
  3. 3.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations