Skip to main content
Log in

Precision microchannel scaffolds for central and peripheral nervous system repair

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In previous studies, we demonstrated the ability to linearly guide axonal regeneration using scaffolds comprised of precision microchannels 2 mm in length. In this work, we report our efforts to augment the manufacturing process to achieve clinically relevant scaffold dimensions in the centimeter-scale range. By selective etching of multi-component fiber bundles, agarose hydrogel scaffolds with highly ordered, close-packed arrays of microchannels, ranging from 172 to 320 μm, were fabricated with overall dimensions approaching clinically relevant length scales. Cross-sectional analyses determined that the maximum microchannel volume per unit volume of scaffold approached 80%, which is nearly twice that compared to our previously reported study. Statistical analyses at various points along the length of the microchannels also show a significant degree of linearity along the entire length of the scaffold. Two types of multi-component fiber bundle templates were evaluated; polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate). The scaffolds consisting of 2 cm long microchannels were fabricated with the poly(methyl methacrylate) fiber-cores exhibited a higher degree of linearity compared to those fabricated using polystyrene fibers. It is believed that the materials process developed in this study is useful for fabricating high aspect ratio microchannels in biocompatible materials with a wide range of geometries for guiding nerve regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation. One degree of separation: paralysis and spinal cord injury in the United States. Online. Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation; 2009. Available from URL: http://www.christopherreeve.org/site/c.mtKZKgMWKwG/b.5184239/k.58F3/One_Degree_of_Separation.htm.

  2. Archibald SJ, Krarup C, Shefner J, Li ST, Madison RD. A collagen-based nerve guide conduit for peripheral nerve repair: an electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates. J Comp Neurol. 1991;306:685–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu BS. Fabrication and evaluation of a biodegradable proanthocyanidin-crosslinked gelatin conduit in peripheral nerve repair. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;87A:1092–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans GRD, Brandt K, Widmer MS, Lu L, Meszlenyi RK, Gupta PK, et al. In vivo evaluation of poly(l-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1109–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumoto K, Ohnishi K, Kiyotani T, Sekine T, Ueda H, Nakamura T, et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration across an 80-mm gap bridged by a polyglycolic acid (PGA)-collagen tube filled with laminin-coated collagen fibers: a histological and electrophysiological evaluation of regenerated nerves. Brain Res. 2000;868:315–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Widmer M, Gupta P, Lu L, Meszlenyi R, Evans G, Brandt K, et al. Manufacture of porous biodegradable polymer conduits by an extrusion process for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1945–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stokols S, Tuszynski MH. Freeze-dried agarose scaffolds with uniaxial microchannels stimulate and guide linear axonal growth following spinal cord injury. Biomaterials. 2006;27:443–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin BC, Minner EJ, Wiseman SL, Klank RL, Gilbert RJ. Agarose and methylcellulose hydrogel blends for nerve regeneration applications. J Neural Eng. 2008;5:221–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sondell M, Lundborg G, Kanje M. Regeneration of the rat sciatic nerve into allografts made acellular through chemical extraction. Brain Res. 1998;795:44–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crouzier T, McClendon T, Tosun Z, McFetridge PS. Inverted human umbilical arteries with tunable wall thicknesses for nerve regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89A:818–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang KK, Costas PD, Bryan DJ, Jones DS, Seckel BR. Inside-out vein graft promotes improved nerve regeneration in rats. J Reconstruc Microsurg. 1993;14:608–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heath C, Rutkowski G. The development of bioartificial nerve grafts for peripheral-nerve regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 1998;16:163–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma PX, Zhang R. Microtubular architecture of biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56:469–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadlock T, Elisseeff J, Langer R, Vacanti J, Cheney M. A tissue-engineered conduit for peripheral nerve repair. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:1081–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stokols S, Sakamoto J, Breckon C, Holt T, Weiss J, Tuszynski MH. Templated agarose scaffolds support linear axonal regeneration. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:2777–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gros T, Sakamoto S, Blesch A, Havton LA, Tuszynski MH. Regeneration of long-tract axons through sites of spinal cord injury using templated agarose scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6719–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lundborg G, Dahlin LB, Danielsen N, Gelberman RH, Longo FM, Powell HC, Varon S. Nerve regeneration in silicone chambers: influence of gap length and of distal stump components. Exp Neur. 1982;76:361–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki Y, Tanihara M, Ohnishi K, Suzuki K. Cat peripheral nerve regeneration across 50 mm gap repaired with a novel nerve guide composed of freeze-dried alginate gel. Neurosci Lett. 1999;259:75–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ansselin A, Fink T, Davey D. Peripheral nerve regeneration through nerve guides seeded with adult Schwann cells. Neuropath Applied Neurobio. 1997;23:387–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiyotani T, Teramachi M, Takimoto Y. Nerve regeneration across a 25-mm gap bridged by a polyglycolic acid-collagen tube: a histological and electrophysiological evaluation of nerves. Brain Res. 1996;740:66–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinis N, Schaller H, Schulte-Eversum C, Schlosshauer B, Doser M, Dietz K, Rosner H, Muller H, Haerle M. Nerve regeneration across a 2-cm gap in the rat median nerve using a resorbable nerve conduit filled with Schwann Cells. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:1067–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehrotra S, Lynam D, Maloney R, Pawelec K, Tuszynski MH, Lee I, Chan C, Sakamoto J. Time controlled protein release by layer-by-layer assembled multilayer functionalized agarose hydrogels. Adv Func Mat. 2009;20:247–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Flynn L, Dalton PD, Shoichet MS. Fiber templating of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4265–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodríguez F, Gomez N, Perego G, Navarro X. Highly permeable polylactide-caprolactone nerve guides enhance peripheral nerve regeneration through long gaps. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Plikk P, Malbert S, Albertsson AC. Design of resorbable porous tubular copolyester scaffolds for use in nerve regeneration. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:1259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore M, Friedman J, Lewellyn E. Multiple-microchannel scaffolds to promote spinal cord axon regeneration. Biomaterials. 2006;27:419–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bender M, Bennett J, Waddell R, Doctor J, Marra K. Multi-channeled biodegradable polymer/CultiSpher composite nerve guides. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1269–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, et al. Manufacture of porous polymer nerve conduits through a lyophilizing and wire-heating process. J Biomed Mater Res: Appl Biomater. 2005;74B:659–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong D, Leveque JC, Brumblay H, Krebsbach P, Hollister S, LaMarca F. Macro-architectures in spinal cord scaffold implants influence regeneration. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:1027–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghosh S, Viana J, Reis R, Mano J. Development of porous lamellar poly(l-lactic acid) scaffolds by conventional injection molding process. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:887–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Veterans Administration and the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Mark Tuszynski at the University of California, San Diego for his insightful interaction and assistance with characterizing the in vivo efficacy of the scaffolds described in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey S. Sakamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynam, D., Bednark, B., Peterson, C. et al. Precision microchannel scaffolds for central and peripheral nervous system repair. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 22, 2119–2130 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4387-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4387-3

Keywords

Navigation