Nanostructured positively charged bioactive TiO2 layer formed on Ti metal by NaOH, acid and heat treatments

  • Deepak K. Pattanayak
  • Seiji Yamaguchi
  • Tomiharu Matsushita
  • Tadashi Kokubo


Nanometer-scale roughness was generated on the surface of titanium (Ti) metal by NaOH treatment and remained after subsequent acid treatment with HCl, HNO3 or H2SO4 solution, as long as the acid concentration was not high. It also remained after heat treatment. Sodium hydrogen titanate produced by NaOH treatment was transformed into hydrogen titanate after subsequent acid treatment as long as the acid concentration was not high. The hydrogen titanate was then transformed into titanium oxide (TiO2) of anatase and rutile by heat treatment. Treated Ti metals exhibited high apatite-forming abilities in a simulated body fluid especially when the acid concentration was greater than 10 mM, irrespective of the type of acid solutions used. This high apatite-forming ability was maintained in humid environments for long periods. The high apatite-forming ability was attributed to the positive surface charge that formed on the TiO2 layer and not to the surface roughness or a specific crystalline phase. This positively charged TiO2 induced apatite formation by first selectively adsorbing negatively charged phosphate ions followed by positively charged calcium ions. Apatite formation is expected on the surfaces of such treated Ti metals after short periods, even in living systems. The bonding of metal to living bone is also expected to take place through this apatite layer.


Zeta Potential Simulated Body Fluid Positive Surface Charge Apatite Formation Sodium Titanate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The present authors acknowledge Prof. Y. Taga of Chubu University, Japan for his assistance in the XPS measurements. Useful suggestions by Dr. T. Kizuki and Prof. H. Takadama of Chubu University are also acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Hanawa T, Kamimura Y, Yamamoto S, Kohgo T, Amemiya A, Ukai M, Murakami H, Asaoka K. Early bone formation around calcium-ion-implanted titanium inserted into rat tibia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;36:131–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armitage DA, Mihoc R, Tate TJ, McPhail DS, Chater R, Hobkirk JA, Shinawi L, Jones FH. The oxidation of calcium implanted titanium in water: a depth profiling study. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253:4085–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nayab SH, Jones FH, Olsen I. Effect of calcium ion implantation on bone cell function in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 2007;83A:296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3893–4007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song WH, Ryu HS, Hong SH. Apatite induction on Ca-containing titania formed by micro-arc oxidation. J Am Ceram Soc. 2005;88:2642–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frojd V, Franke-Stenport V, Meirelles L, Wennerberg A. Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in vivo study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:561–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu J, Liu ZM, Zhao XH, Gao Y, Hu J, Gao B. Improved biological performance of microarc-oxidized low-modulus Ti–24Nb–4Zr–7.9Sn alloy. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010;92B:298–306.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whiteside P, Matykina E, Gough JE, Skeldon P, Thompson GE. In vitro evaluation of cell proliferation and collagen synthesis on titanium following plasma electrolytic oxidation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010;94A:38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakagawa M, Zhang L, Udoh K, Matsuya S, Ishikawa K. Effects of hydrothermal treatment with CaCl2 solution on surface property and cell response of titanium implants. J Mater Sci. 2005;16:985–91.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park JW, Park KB, Suh JY. Effects of calcium ion incorporation on bone healing of Ti6Al4V alloy implants in rabbit tibiae. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3306–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ueda M, Ikeda M, Ogawa M. Chemical–hydrothermal combined surface modification of titanium for improvement of osteointegration. J Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29:994–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen XB, Li YC, Plessis JD, Hodgson PD, Wen C. Influence of calcium ion deposition on apatite-inducing ability of porous titanium for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1808–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park JW, Kim YJ, Jang JH, Kwon TG, Bae YC, Suh JY. Effects of phosphoric acid treatment of titanium surfaces on surface properties, osteoblast response and removal of torque forces. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1661–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kokubo T, Miyaji F, Kim HM, Nakamura T. Spontaneous formation of bone-like apatite layer on chemically treated titanium metals. J Am Ceram Soc. 1996;79:1127–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloy via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:409–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan WQ, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;37:267–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan WQ, Nakamura T, Kawanabe K, Nishiguchi S, Oka M, Kokubo T. Apatite layer-coated titanium for use as bone bonding implants. Biomaterials. 1997;18:1185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nishiguchi S, Fujibayashi S, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Biology of alkali- and heat-treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;67A:26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawanabe K, Ise K, Goto K, Akiyama H, Nakamura T, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Matsumoto T. A new cementless total hip arthoplasty with bioactive titanium porous-coating by alkaline and heat treatment: average 4.8-year results. J Biomed Mater Res. 2009;90B:476–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kokubo T, Pattanayak DK, Yamaguchi S, Takadama H, Matsushita T, Kawai T, Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T. Positively charged bioactive titanium metal prepared by simple chemical and heat treatments. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7:S503–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pattanayak DK, Kawai T, Matsushita T, Takadama H, Nakamura T, Kokubo T. Effect of HCl concentrations on apatite-forming ability of NaOH–HCl– and heat-treated titanium metal. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2009;20:2401–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of porous bioactive titanium metal. Biomaterials. 2004;25:443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Suzuki J, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of porous bioactive titanium. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6014–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Suzuki J, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinductive porous titanium implants: effect of sodium removal by dilute HCl treatment. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2682–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, So K, Akiyama N, Matsushita T, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. A porous bioactive titanium implant for spinal inter body fusion: an experimental study using a canine model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T. Effect of water treatment on the apatite-forming ability of NaOH-treated titanium metal. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:522–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang XX, Hayakawa S, Tsuru K, Osaka A. Bioactive titania gel layers formed by chemical treatment of Ti substrate with a H2O2/HCl solution. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1353–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang XX, Yan W, Hayakawa S, Tsuru K, Osaka A. Apatite deposition on thermally and anodically oxidized titanium surfaces in a simulated body fluid. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4631–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1003–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rohanizadeh R, Al-Sadeq M, LeGeros RZ. Preparation of different forms of titanium oxide on titanium surface: effects on apatite deposition. J Biomed Mater Res. 2004;71A:343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu JM, Hayakawa S, Tsuru K, Osaka A. Low-temperature preparation of anatase and rutile layers on titanium substrates and their ability to induce in vitro apatite deposition. J Am Ceram Soc. 2004;87:1635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lu X, Zhao Z, Leng Y. Biomimetic calcium phosphate coatings on nitric acid treated titanium surfaces. J Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27:700–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee MH, Park IS, Min KS, Ahn SG, Park JM, Song KY, Park CW. Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo tests for surface modified titanium by H2SO4 and H2O2 treatment. Met Mater Int. 2007;13:109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lu X, Wang Y, Yang X, Zhang Q, Zhao Z, Weng LT, Leng Y. Spectroscopic analysis of titanium surface functional groups under various surface modification and their behaviors in invitro and invivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 2008;84A:523–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lindberg F, Heinrichs J, Ericson F, Thomsen P, Engqvist H. Hydroxylapatite growth on single-crystal rutile substrates. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sugino A, Ohtsuki C, Tsuru K, Hayakawa S, Nakano T, Okazaki Y, Osaka A. Effect of spatial design and thermal oxidation on apatite formation on Ti–15Zr–4Ta–4Nb alloy. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27:2907–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sun X, Li Y. Synthesis and characterization of ion-exchangeable titanate nanotubes. Chem Eur J. 2003;9:2229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tsai CC, Teng H. Structural features of nanotubes synthesized from NaOH treatment on TiO2 with different post-treatments. Chem Mater. 2006;18:367–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Textor M, Sittig C, Frauchiger V, Tosatti S, Brunette DM. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in medicine. Germany: Springer; 2001. p. 171–230.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kokubo T, Takagi H, Tashiro M. Alkaline durability of BaO–TiO2–SiO2 glasses. J Non Cryst Solids. 1982;52:427–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T, Nishiguchi S, Tamura J, Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T. Bioactive titanium: effect of sodium removal on the bone-bonding ability of bioactive titanium prepared by alkali and heat treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;56:562–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepak K. Pattanayak
    • 1
  • Seiji Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Tomiharu Matsushita
    • 1
  • Tadashi Kokubo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical SciencesCollege of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu UniversityKasugaiJapan

Personalised recommendations