Two ply tubular scaffolds comprised of proteins/poliglecaprone/polycaprolactone fibers

  • Xing Zhang
  • Vinoy Thomas
  • Yogesh K. Vohra


Electrospun bi-layer tubular hybrid scaffolds composed of poliglecaprone (PGC), polycaprolactone (PCL), elastin (E), and gelatin (G) were prepared and thereafter crosslinked by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC). Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images revealed a highly porous micro-structure comprising randomly distributed non-woven fibers with the majority of fibers in submicron diameters. The EDC-crosslinking yielded an average crosslinking degree of 40%. Uni-axial tensile test of hydrated scaffolds in both longitudinal and circumferential directions revealed tensile properties, comparable to those of native arteries. The graft (PGC:PCL = 1:3) did not demonstrate significant difference before and after EDC-crosslinking in tensile strength or % strain in either longitudinal or circumferential directions. However, crosslinking increased the Young’s modulus of the graft along the longitudinal direction (from 5.84 to 8.67 MPa). On the contrary, the graft (3:1) demonstrated a significant decrease in maximum strain in both directions. Cyto-assay using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) showed excellent cell viability.


Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Composite Scaffold Crosslinking Degree Electrospun Scaffold Native Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors acknowledge the financial support from National Science Foundation-NSF-NIRT program under DMR-0402891. The authors are also grateful for instrumental training and support from Drs. Derrick Dean and Robin Foley of Department of Material Sciences and Engineering, and Pre-doctorals Moncy Jose of Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Ting Feng of Department of Microbiology.


  1. 1.
    Buttafoco L, Engbers-Buijtenhuijs P, Poot AA, Dijkstra PJ, Vermes I, Feijen J. Physical characterization of vascular grafts cultured in a bioreactor. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2380–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoenig MR, Campbell GR, Rolfe BE, Campbell JH. Tissue-engineered blood vessels: alternative to autologous grafts? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1128–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeong SI, Kim SY, Cho SK, Chong MS, Kim KS, Kim H, et al. Tissue-engineered vascular grafts composed of marine collagen and PLGA fibers using pulsatile perfusion bioreactors. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1115–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Niklason LE, Gao J, Abbott WM, Hirschi KK, Houser S, Marini R, et al. Functional arteries grown in vitro. Science. 1999;284:489–93.CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tiwari A, Salacinski HJ, Punshon G, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Development of a hybrid cardiovascular graft using a tissue engineering approach. Faseb J. 2002;16:791–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boland ED, Matthews JA, Pawlowski KJ, Simpson DG, Wnek GE, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning collagen and elastin: preliminary vascular tissue engineering. Front Biosci. 2004;9:1422–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li M, Mondrinos MJ, Gandhi MR, Ko FK, Weiss AS, Lelkes PI. Electrospun protein fibers as matrices for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5999–6008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sell SA, McClure MJ, Barnes CP, Knapp DC, Walpoth BH, Simpson DG, et al. Electrospun polydioxanone-elastin blends: potential for bioresorbable vascular grafts. Biomed Mater. 2006;1:72–80.CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stitzel J, Liu J, Lee SJ, Komura M, Berry J, Soker S, et al. Controlled fabrication of a biological vascular substitute. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1088–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang Z-M, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:2223–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sill TJ, von Recum HA. Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1989–2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas V, Dean DR, Vohra YK. Nanostructured biomaterials for regenerative medicine. Curr Nanosci. 2006;2:155–77.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas V, Dean DR, Jose MV, Mathew B, Chowdhury S, Vohra YK. Nanostructured biocomposite scaffolds based on collagen coelectrospun with nanohydroxyapatite. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:631–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barnes CP, Sell SA, Boland ED, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Nanofiber technology: designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:1413–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee SJ, Liu J, Oh SH, Soker S, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Development of a composite vascular scaffolding system that withstands physiological vascular conditions. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2891–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee J, Tae G, Kim YH, Park IS, Kim SH, Kim SH. The effect of gelatin incorporation into electrospun poly(l-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) fibers on mechanical properties and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1872–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li M, Guo Y, Wei Y, MacDiarmid AG, Lelkes PI. Electrospinning polyaniline-contained gelatin nanofibers for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2705–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barnes CP, Pemble CW, Brand DD, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Cross-linking electrospun type ii collagen tissue engineering scaffolds with carbodiimide in ethanol. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:1593–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caracciolo PC, Thomas V, Vohra YK, Buffa F and Abraham GA. Electrospinning of novel biodegradable poly(ester urethane)s and poly(ester urethane urea)s for soft tissue-engineering applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009. doi  10.1007/s10856-009-3768-3.
  20. 20.
    He W, Yong T, Teo WE, Ma Z, Ramakrishna S. Fabrication and endothelialization of collagen-blended biodegradable polymer nanofibers: potential vascular graft for blood vessel tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1574–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu C, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun nanofiber fabrication as synthetic extracellular matrix and its potential for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:1160–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li M, Mondrinos MJ, Chen X, Gandhi MR, Ko FK, Lelkes PI. Co-electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide), gelatin, and elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79:963–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas V, Zhang X, Catledge SA, Vohra YK. Functionally graded electrospun scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties for vascular tissue regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2007;2:224–32.CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang X, Thomas V, Vohra YK. In vitro biodegradation of designed tubular scaffolds of electrospun protein/polyglyconate blend fibers. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;89:135–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Badylak SF. Modification of natural polymers: collagen. In: Atala A, Lanza R, editors. Methods of tissue engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2002. p. 505–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jayakrishnan A, Jameela SR. Glutaraldehyde as a fixative in bioprostheses and drug delivery matrices. Biomaterials. 1996;17:471–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Koob TJ. Collagen fixation. In: Wnek GE, Bowlin G, editors. Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. p. 335–47.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khor E. Methods for the treatment of collagenous tissues for bioprostheses. Biomaterials. 1997;18:95–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Wachem PB, van Luyn MJ, Olde Damink LH, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J, Nieuwenhuis P. Biocompatibility and tissue regenerating capacity of crosslinked dermal sheep collagen. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28:353–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pieper JS, Hafmans T, Veerkamp JH, van Kuppevelt TH. Development of tailor-made collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices: EDC/NHS crosslinking, and ultrastructural aspects. Biomaterials. 2000;21:581–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thomas V, Kumari TV, Jayabalan M. In vitro studies on the effect of physical cross-linking on the biological performance of aliphatic poly(urethane urea) for blood contact applications. Biomacromolecules. 2001;2:588–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma Z, He W, Young T, Ramakrishna S. Potential of nanofiber matrix as scaffolds in tissue-engineering. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L’Heureux N, Dusserre N, Marini A, Garrido S, de la Fuente L, McAllister T. Technology insight: the evolution of tissue-engineered vascular grafts—from research to clinical practice. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:389–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)BirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Center for Nanoscale Materials and Biointegration (CNMB), Department of PhysicsUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)BirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations