Advertisement

Fabrication and biocompatibility of nano non-stoichiometric apatite and poly(ε-caprolactone) composite scaffold by using prototyping controlled process

  • Liang Ye
  • Xinchen Zeng
  • Haojiang Li
  • Yi Ai
Article

Abstract

Nano biocomposite scaffolds of non-stoichiometric apatite (ns-AP) and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) were prepared by a prototyping controlled process (PCP). The results show that the composite scaffolds with 40 wt% ns-AP contained open and well interconnected pores with a size of 400–500 μm, and exhibited a maximum porosity of 76%. The ns-AP particles were not completely embedded in PCL matrix while exposed on the composite surface, which might be useful for cell attachment and growth. Proliferation of MG63 cells was significantly better on the composite scaffolds with porosity of 76% than that those with porosity of 53%, indicating that the scaffolds with high porosity facilitated cell growth, and could promote cell proliferation. The composite scaffolds were implanted into rabbit thighbone defects to investigate the in vivo biocompatibility and osteogenesis. Radiological and histological examination confirmed that the new bony tissue had grown easily into the entire composite scaffold. The results suggest that the well-interconnected pores in the scaffolds might encourage cell proliferation, and migration to stimulate cell functions, thus enhancing bone formation in the scaffolds. This study shows that bioactive and biocompatible ns-AP/PCL composite scaffolds have potential applications in bone tissue engineering.

Keywords

Compressive Strength Apatite MG63 Cell Composite Surface Composite Scaffold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Fan Minghui from Institute of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China for her assistance in material preparation of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Motskin M, Wright DM, Muller K, Kyle N, Gard TG, Porter AE, et al. Hydroxyapatite nano and microparticles: correlation of particle properties with cytotoxicity and biostability. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3307–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zou Q, Li YB, Zhang L, Zuo Y, Li JF, Li JD. Antibiotic delivery system using nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan bone cement consisting of berberine. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89:1108–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphate-based biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials. J Mater Sci. 2009;44:2343–87.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balasundaram G, Webster TJ. An overview of nano-polymers for orthopedic applications. Macromol Biosci. 2007;7:635–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Best SM, Porter AE, Thian ES, Huang J. Bioceramics: past, present and for the future. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2008;7:1319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shor L, Guceri S, Wen XJ, Gandhi M, Sun W. Fabrication and cell-matrix interaction study on three-dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5291–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhee SH, Choi JY, Kim HM. Preparation of a bioactive and degradable poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/silica hybrid through a sol-gel method. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4915–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker SC, Rohman G, Southgate J, Cameron NR. The relationship between the mechanical properties and cell behaviour on PLGA and PCL scaffolds for bladder tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1321–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rhee SH. Effect of molecular weight of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) on interpenetrating network structure, apatite-forming ability, and degradability of poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/silica nano-hybrid materials. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1721–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yeo A, Rai B, Sju E, Cheong JJ, Teoh SH. The degradation profile of novel, bioresorbable PCL-TCP scaffolds: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;84:208–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aizawa M, Ueno H, Itatani K, Okada I. Syntheses of calcium-deficient apatite fibres by a homogeneous precipitation method and their characterizations. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2006;4–5:501–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sachlos E, Gotora D, Czernuszka JT. Collagen scaffolds reinforced with biomimetic composite nano-sized carbonate-substituted hydroxyapatite crystals and shaped by rapid prototyping to contain internal microchannels. Tissue Eng. 2006;9:2479–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kannan S, Pina S, Ferreira JMF. Formation of strontium-stabilized β-tricalcium phosphate from calcium-deficient apatite. J Am Ceram Soc. 2006;89(10):3277–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mobini S, Javadpour J, Hosseinalipour M, Ghazi-Khansari M, Khavandi A, Rezaie HR. Synthesis and characterisation of gelatin-nano hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Adv Appl Ceram. 2008;107(1):4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang YX, Ren J, Chen C, Ren TB, Zhou XY. Preparation and properties of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)/nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation and rabbit MSCs culture on scaffolds. J Biomater Appl. 2008;22(5):409–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jose MV, Thomas V, Johnson KT, Dean DR, Nyalro E. Aligned PLGA/HA nanofibrous nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(1):305–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peltola SM, Melchels FPW, Grijpma DW, Kellomaki M. A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann Med. 2008;40:268–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yousefi AM, Gauvin C, Sun L, DiRaddo RW, Fernandas J. Design and fabrication of 3D-plotted polymetric scaffolds in functional tissue engineering. Polym Eng Sci. 2007;47:608–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cahill S, Lohfeld S, McHugh PE. Finite element predictions compared to experimental results for the effective modulus of bone tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20:1255–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ge ZG, Wang LS, Heng BC, Tian XF, Lu K, Fan VTW, et al. Proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblasts within 3D printed poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid scaffolds. J Biomater Appl. 2009;23:533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan H, Kurashina K, de Groot K, Zhang X. A preliminary study on osteoinduction of two kinds of calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1799–806.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nejati E, Mirzadeh H, Zandi M. Synthesis and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite rods/poly(l-lactide acid) composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Composites A. 2008;39(10):1589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang PB, Hong ZK, Yu T, Chen XS, Jing XB. In vivo mineralization and osteogenesis of nanocomposite scaffold of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and hydroxyapatite surface-grafted with poly(l-lactide). Biomaterials. 2009;30:58–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hong Z, Zhang P, He C, Qiu X, Liu A, Chen L. Nano-composite of poly(l-lactide) and surface grafted hydroxyapatite: mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2005;32:6296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu X, Eibl O, Scheideler L, Geis-Gerstorfer Jurgen J. Characterization of nano hydroxyapatite/collagen surfaces and cellular behaviors. Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79(1):114–127.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou DS, Zhao KB, Li Y, Cui FZ, Lee IS. Repair of segmental defecits with nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLA composite combined with mesenchymal stem cells. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2006;5:373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khang D, Kim SY, Liu-Snyder P, Palmore GTR, Durbin SM, Webster TJ. Enhanced fibronectin adsorption on carbon nanotube/poly(carbonate) urethane: independent role of surface nano-roughness and associated surface energy. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4756–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang LJ, Ramsaywack S, Fenniri H, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on self-assembled nanostructured hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng A. 2008;14:1353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guanghua School of StomatologySun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Zhongshan School of MedicineSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Life SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations