Advertisement

Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter

  • A. Kakaboura
  • M. Fragouli
  • C. Rahiotis
  • N. Silikas
Article

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to compare various roughness and topography measurement methods to characterize the surface quality in several types of resin composites. The initial surface quality of several resin composites was compared. The materials evaluated were of three categories: i) hybrid: TPH Spectrum; ii) reinforced microfill: Micronew and iii) microhybrid: Synergy Duo, Esthet-X, Point.4 and Palfique Estelite. Three Groups of identical disk-shaped specimens (10 × 1.5 mm) were prepared from each material (n = 6) and polished with Soflex discs. Macro-roughness (Ra) was measured with Group 1 by 2-D profilometry. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) gave 3-D images and micro-roughness (Ra) of Group 2. Surface optical gloss at 60 was determined for Group 3. Specimens of each material were also studied by scanning electron microscopy. Macro-Ra values (μm) ranged from 0.30 to 0.56. Micro-Ra values ranged from 0.03 to 0.14 and they differed from macro-Ra values in ranking order. Percentage Gloss values ranged from 30.6 to 70.1%. The results revealed that micro-roughness showed a high correlation with gloss values (r = 0.93), whilst macro-roughness did not (r = 0.62). Moreover, the AFM method showed higher capability to distinguish surface roughness compared with the 2-D profilometry and to reveal more detailed definition of surface texture than the examination under SEM.

Keywords

Atomic Force Microscopy Surface Quality Atomic Force Microscopy Image Surface Texture Resin Composite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. TJAN and C. CHAN, J. Prosth. Dent. 61 (1989) 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. DE JAGER, A. FEILZER and C. L. DAVIDSON, Dent. Mater. 16 (2000) 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    http://www.dentsply.co.uk/products/products/esthetx.htm.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. CAMPBELL, W. JOHNSTON and W. J. O’BRIEN, J. Dent. Res. 65 (1986) 892.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. JUDD and G. WYSZECKI, in “Color in Business, Science and Industry.” (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1975) p. 397.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. WHITEHEAD, A. SHEARER, D. C. WATTS, N. H. F. WILSON, et al., Dent. Mater. 15 (1999) 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. WENNERBERG, R. OHLSSON, B. G. ROSEN and B. ANDERSSON, Med. Eng. Phys. 18 (1996) 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. JONIOT, G. GREGOIRE, A. M. AUTHER and Y. M. J. ROQUES, Oper. Dent. 25 (2000) 311.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. WHITEHEAD, A. SHEARER, D. C. WATTS and N. H. F. WILSON, J. Oral. Rehab. 22 (1995) 421.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. WHITEHEAD, A. SHEARER, D. C. WATTS and N. H. F. WILSON, Dent. Mater. 12 (1996) 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. MARSHALL, M. BALOOCH, R. J. TENCH, M. KINNEY and S. J. MARSHALL, Dent. Mater. 9 (1993) 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. SILIKAS, A. R. LENNIE, K. E. R. ENGLAND and D. C. WATTS, Microscopy and Analysis 82 (2001) 19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. YAP and B. MOK, Oper. Dent. 27 (2002) 161.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. RYBA, W. DUNN and D. F. MURCHISON, Oper. Dent. 27 (2002) 243.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. WILDER, E. SWIFT, K. N. MAY, J. Y. THOMPSON and R. A. MCDOUGAL, J. Dent. 28 (2000) 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. VAN MEERBEEK, M. VARGAS, S. INOUE, Y. YOSHIDA, J. PERDIGAO, P. LAMBRECHTS and G. VANHERLE, Am. J. Dent. 13 (2000) 3D.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. ABU-BAKR, L. HAN, A. OKAMOTO and M. IWAKU, Dent. Mater. J. 20 (2001) 172.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. MARIGO, M. RIZZI, G. LA TORRE, G. RUMI, 3-D. Oper. Dent. 26 (2001) 562.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. STOUT and L. BLUNT., in “Three-Dimensional Surface Topography” (Penton Press, London, 2000) p. 178.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. TAY, S. SIKDAR and M. MANNAN, J. Materials Processing Technology 120 (2002) 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. WASSELL, J. F. MCCABE and A. W. WALLS, Dent. Mater. 10 (1994) 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. BOLLEN, P. LAMBRECHTS and M. QUIRYNEN, Dent. Mater. 13 (1997) 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. WEITMAN and W. EAMES, Oral Health 65 (1975) 29.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. WEITMAN and W. EAMES, J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 91 (1975) 101.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. SHINTANI, J. SATOU, H. HAYASHIHARA and T. INOUE, Dent. Mater. 1 (1985) 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. CHUNG, Dent. Mater. 10 (1994) 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. BILLMEYER and R. ABRAMS, J. Paint. Technol. 45 (1973) 23.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. BRIDGEMAN, in “The nature of light and its interaction with matter. Colour physics for industry” (H Charlesworth & Co Ltd, Huddersfield, 1987) p. 1.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. HUNTER, in “The measurement of appearance” (Wiley, New York, 1975) p. 65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Kakaboura
    • 1
  • M. Fragouli
    • 1
  • C. Rahiotis
    • 1
  • N. Silikas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of AthensGreece
  2. 2.Biomaterials Research Group, School of DentistryThe University of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations