On the use of non-MPB lead zirconium titanate (PZT) granules for piezoelectric ceramic–polymer sensorial composites
- 192 Downloads
Modern flexible and sensitive sensors based on polymer–ceramic composites employ lead zirconate titanate (PZT) granulates having the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) composition as the piezo active ingredient, as this composition gives the best properties in fully ceramic piezoelectric sensors. In this study, the possibility of using PZT granulates with compositions, which are not in the MPB region of the PZT phase diagram was investigated. Random 0–3 PZT–epoxy composites were prepared for the complete composition range of PZT ceramics [Pb(ZrxTi(1−x))0.99Nb0.01O3] with x ranging from x = 0 to x = 0.80. Piezoelectric and dielectric properties of such composites were systematically studied. It is shown that the highest voltage sensitivity (i.e. g33) of the piezoelectric composites is obtained for composition with much lower Zr levels (x < 0.1) than the MPB composition. The shift in optimal composition is related to shift in dielectric constant of PZT as a function of the Zr concentration.
KeywordsDielectric Constant Piezoelectric Property Epoxy Composite Morphotropic Phase Boundary Effective Dielectric Constant
This work was financially supported by the Smartmix funding program (Grant No. SMVA06071), as part of the “Smart systems based on integrated Piezo” program. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical support provided by Dr. I. Katsouras of the Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research at Mainz for the hysteresis loop measurements.
- 1.B. Jaffe, W.R. Cook Jr., H. Jaffe, Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic Press, New York, 1971)Google Scholar
- 4.A. J. Moulson, J. M. Herbert, Electroceramics: Materials, Properties, Applications, 2nd edn. (John Wiley & Sons, 2003)Google Scholar
- 8.F. Li, R. Zuo, Bismuth sodium titanate based lead-free ceramic/epoxy 1–3 composites: fabrication and electromechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 25, 2730–2736 (2014)Google Scholar
- 9.M.T. Sebastian, H. Jantunen, Polymer–ceramic composites of 0–3 connectivity for circuits in electronics: a review. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 7, 415–434 (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.P.K. Mahato, S. Sen, Effect of surface modification of ceramic particles by SDS on the electrical properties of PZT–PVDF and BT–PVDF composites: interface effect. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 26, 2969–2976 (2015)Google Scholar
- 11.S. Dalle Vacche, Y. Leterrier, V. Michaud, D. Damjanovic, A.B. Aebersold, J.-A.E. Månson, Effect of interfacial interactions on the electromechanical response of poly (vinylidene fluoride–trifluoroethylene)/BaTiO 3 composites and its time dependence after poling. Compos. Sci. Technol. 114, 103–109 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.F. Chengju, M. Wei, Q. Yan, H. Zhixiong, G. Dongyun, Damping property of epoxy-based composite embedded with sol–gel-derived Pb (Zr0. 53Ti0. 47) O3 thin film. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 22, 911–914 (2011)Google Scholar
- 21.N.K. James, D. van den Ende, U. Lafont, S. van der Zwaag, W.A. Groen, Piezoelectric and mechanical properties of structured PZT–epoxy composites. J. Mater. Res. 28, 635–641 (2013)Google Scholar