Abstract
The design of hierarchical tubular nanostructure is a big challenge to improve the photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance. Herein, we designed and synthesized hierarchical ZnFe2O4 (ZFO) nanotube arrays grown on FTO substrates through self-sacrifice template routes. The well-defined ZFO nanotube arrays with a pore diameter of 150 ~ 200 nm provided special configuration for PEC water splitting, such as large specific surface area, direct electron transport pathway, and low surface charge recombination rate. As expected, the optimized ZFO nanotube arrays with non-noble metal molybdenum sulfide as co-catalyst exhibited excellent PEC activity (maximum photocurrent density up to 0.9 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE) under AM 1.5G simulated sunlight (100 mW cm−2). And the photocurrent density of the ZFO/MoSx electrode can maintain ca. 72.0% initial value under 1 h continuous light illumination. Via intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy analysis, the enhanced mechanism of PEC water oxidation was discovered, that is, the improved surface charge separation efficiency aroused by the increased charge transfer efficiency for the optimized ZFO/MoSx electrode. Low charge recombination and fast carrier transfer accelerated the water oxidation kinetics at the electrode/electrolyte interface. This work provides a valuable insight to understand the interfacial charge transfer kinetics for the catalyst decorated photoelectrode toward efficient solar water oxidation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young JL, Steiner MA, Döscher H, France RM, Turner JA (2017) Todd G Deutsch. Nat Energy 2:17028–17036. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.28
Jang JW, Du C, Ye Y et al (2015) Nat Commun 6:7447. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8447
Gu J, Aguiar JA, Ferrere S et al (2017) Nat Energy 2:7447–7452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.192
Li S, Liu C, Chen P, Lv W, Liu G (2020) J Catal 382:212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.030
Feng D, Qu J, Zhang R et al (2020) J Catal 381:501–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.11.033
Xiao J, Fan L, Zhao F, Huang Z, Zhou SF, Zhan G (2020) J Catal 381:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.10.033
Hisatomi T, Kubota J, Domen K (2014) Chem Soc Rev 43:7520–7535. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60378d
JMS Shannon W. Boettcher, Morgan C. Putnam, Emily L. Warren, Daniel B. Turner-Evans, Michael D. Kelzenberg, James R. Maiolo, Harry A. Atwater, Nathan S. Lewis (2010) Science 327: 185–187. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180783
Wu M, Chen WJ, Shen YH, Huang FZ, Li CH, Li SK (2014) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15052–15060. https://doi.org/10.1021/am503044f
X Zhu, N Guijarro, Y Liu, et al. (2018) Adv Mater: 1801612–1801618. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801612
Kim JH, Jang YJ, Choi SH et al (2018) J Mater Chem A 6:12693–12700. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta02161a
Y Li, R Cao, L Li, et al. (2020) Small: 1906735–1906745. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201906735
L Chai, Z Hu, X Wang, et al. (2020) Advanced Science: 1903195–1903205. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201903195
Bai Z, Yan X, Li Y, Kang Z, Cao S, Zhang Y (2016) Adv Energy Mater 6:1501459–1501467. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501459
Shi L, Zhou W, Li Z, Koul S, Kushima A, Yang Y (2018) ACS Nano 12:6335–6342. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b03940
Chen W, Wang T, Xue J, Li S, Wang Z, Sun S (2017) Small 13:1602420–1602428. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201602420
Jiang B, Han C, Li B, He Y, Lin Z (2016) ACS Nano 10:2728–2735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b07806
Wang K, Chen J, Zhou W et al (2008) Adv Mater 20:3248–3253. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800145
Patnaik S, Das KK, Mohanty A, Parida K (2018) Catal Today 315:52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.008
Hou Y, Li XY, Zhao QD, Quan X, Chen GH (2010) Adv Funct Mater 20:2165–2174. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200902390
Yang T, Xue J, Tan H et al (2018) J Mater Chem A 6:1210–1218. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta07798j
Hou L, Hua H, Lian L, Cao H, Zhu S, Yuan C (2015) Chem Eur J 21:13012–13019. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201501876
Guo X, Zhu H, Si M et al (2014) J Phys Chem C 118:30145–30152. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507991e
Shen L, Yu L, Yu XY, Zhang X, Lou XW (2015) Angew Chem Int Ed 54:1868–1872. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409776
McDonald KJ, Choi KS (2011) Chem Mater 23:4863–4869. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm202399g
Zheng XL, Dinh CT, de Arquer FP et al (2016) Small 12:3181–3188. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201600534
Zhou Y, Zhang L, Lin L et al (2017) Nano Lett 17:8012–8017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04626
Wei J, Yin Z, Chen SC, Cai D, Zheng Q (2016) RSC Adv 6:39137–39143. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra01204c
Shao M, Ning F, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X (2014) Adv Funct Mater 24:580–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201301889
Guo L, Yang Z, Marcus K et al (2018) Energy Environ Sci 11:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02464a
Zeng Y, Yang T, Li C et al (2019) Appl Catal B 245:469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.011
Sahu TK, Shah AK, Gogoi G, Patra AS, Ansari MS, Qureshi M (2018) Chem Commun 54:10483–10486. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cc04882g
Li X, Li T, Ma Y et al (2018) Adv Energy Mater 8:1801357–1801365. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201801357
Li J, Meng Q, Zhang Y et al (2019) Nat Commun 10:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07831-5
Guo Y, Zhang N, Wang X et al (2017) J Mater Chem A 5:7571–7577. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta11134c
Zhou X, Licklederer M, Schmuki P (2016) Electrochem Commun 73:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2016.10.008
Ahn HJ, Yoon KY, Kwak MJ, Jang JH (2016) Angew Chem Int Ed 55:9922–9926. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201603666
Yu F, Li F, Yao T et al (2017) ACS Catal 7:1868–1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b03483
Liu G, Ye S, Yan P et al (2016) Energy Environ Sci 9:1327–1334. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee03802b
Gao Y, Hamann TW (2017) Chem Commun 53:1285–1288. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc09029j
Peter LM, Wijayantha KG, Tahir AA (2012) Faraday Discuss 155:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1fd00079a
Thorne JE, Jang JW, Liu EY, Wang D (2016) Chem Sci 7:3347–3354. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5sc04519c
Zachaus C, Abdi FF, Peter LM, van de Krol R (2017) Chem Sci 8:3712–3719. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7sc00363c
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21771001, 51872002), the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 1708085ME120), the Program of Anhui Scientific and Technical Leaders Reserve Candidates (2018RH168), the Scholar Program for the Outstanding Innovative Talent of College Discipline (Specialty), doctoral start-up fund and open fund for Discipline Construction, Institute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University. Funding was also provided by University Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Province (Grant No. KJ2017A007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Pedro Camargo.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lv, C., Liu, P., Huang, F. et al. Carrier dynamics in hierarchical ZnFe2O4 nanotube arrays and their roles in boosting photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J Mater Sci 56, 9408–9418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05900-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05900-7