Effect of aging status on susceptibility of adiabatic shear localization in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy


The effect of aging status on adiabatic shear band (ASB) in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy is systematically studied under dynamic shear loading. The microstructure within shear bands is characterized using EBSD method. It is found that peak-aged (PA) status shows the highest susceptibility to produce ASBs, followed by natural-aged (NA) status, while over-aged (OA) status exhibits the strongest resistance to shear localization. The localized bands in PA and NA states are characterized as transformed shear bands, composed of dynamically recrystallized (DRXed) ultrafine grains in the center, whereas the deformed shear band in OA status contains elongated subgrain laths and few ultrafine grains, which indeed confirms the previous finding, that DRX precedes the onset of ASB and may serve as the trigger for ASB. Based on the microstructural characteristics from the edge to the center of ASBs, it is demonstrated that progressive subgrain misorientation model can explain the DRX mechanism inside the ASBs, which involves a progressive evolution from lamellar structures to elongated laths, and eventually being transformed into ultrafine equiaxed grains. Precipitates play significant roles in DRX process by altering dislocation multiplication and subsequent evolution of substructures, thereby causing the different susceptibility of adiabatic shear localization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1

Reproduced from our prior work with Elsevier’s permission [24])

Figure 2
Figure 3

Reproduced from our prior work with Elsevier’s permission [24])

Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12


  1. 1

    Murr LE, Ramirez AC, Gaytan SM, Lopez MI, Martinez EY, Hernandez DH et al (2009) Microstructure evolution associated with adiabatic shear bands and shear band failure in ballistic plug formation in Ti–6Al–4V targets. Mater Sci Eng A 516:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Duan CZ, Cai YJ, Wang MJ, Li GH (2009) Microstructural study of adiabatic shear bands formed in serrated chips during high-speed machining of hardened steel. J Mater Sci 44:897–902

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Murr LE, Trillo EA, Pappu S, Kennedy C (2002) Adiabatic shear bands and examples of their role in severe plastic deformation. J Mater Sci 37:3337–3360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Dodd B, Bai Y (2012) Adiabatic shear localization: frontiers and advances. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wei Q, Kecskes L, Jiao T, Hartwig KT, Ramesh KT, Ma E (2004) Adiabatic shear banding in ultrafine-grained Fe processed by severe plastic deformation. Acta Mater 52:1859–1869

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Wu GH, Zhu DZ, Chen GQ, Jiang LT, Zhang Q (2008) Adiabatic shear failure of high reinforcement content aluminum matrix composites. J Mater Sci 43:4483–4486

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Dai LH, Liu LF, Bai YL (2004) Effect of particle size on the formation of adiabatic shear band in particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Mater Lett 58:1773–1776

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lee D, Lee S (2005) Effects of nano-sized α2 (Ti3Al) particles on quasi-static and dynamic deformation behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with bimodal microstructure. J Mater Sci 40:4077–4084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Li J, Li Y, Suo T, Wei Q (2018) Numerical simulations of adiabatic shear localization in textured FCC metal based on crystal plasticity finite element method. Mater Sci Eng A 737:348–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Zhang Z, Eakins DE, Dunne FP (2016) On the formation of adiabatic shear bands in textured HCP polycrystals. Int J Plast 79:196–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Osovski S, Rittel D, Landau P, Venkert A (2012) Microstructural effects on adiabatic shear band formation. Scripta Mater 66:9–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Li JG, Suo T, Huang CX, Li YL, Wang HT, Liu JB (2016) Adiabatic shear localization in nanostructured face centered cubic metals under uniaxial compression. Mater Design 105:262–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Boakye Yiadom S, Khaliq Khan A, Bassim N (2014) Effect of microstructure on the nucleation and initiation of adiabatic shear bands (ASBs) during impact. Mater Sci Eng A 615:373–394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Tiamiyu AA, Badmos AY, Odeshi AG (2016) Effects of temper condition on high strain-rate deformation of AA 2017 aluminum alloy in compression. Mater Design 89:872–883

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Guo Y, Ruan Q, Zhu S, Wei Q, Chen H, Lu J et al (2019) Temperature rise associated with adiabatic shear band: causality clarified. Phys Rev Lett 122:015503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Li J, Li Y, Huang C, Suo T, Wei Q (2017) On adiabatic shear localization in nanostructured face-centered cubic alloys with different stacking fault energies. Acta Mater 141:163–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Rittel D (2009) A different viewpoint on adiabatic shear localization. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:214009

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Rittel D, Landau P, Venkert A (2008) Dynamic recrystallization as a potential cause for adiabatic shear failure. Phys Rev Lett 101:165501

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Medyanik S, Liu W, Li S (2007) On criteria for dynamic adiabatic shear band propagation. J Mech Phys Solids 55:1439–1461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Schonberg WP (1990) Hypervelocity impact penetration phenomena in aluminum space structures. J Aerospace Eng 3:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Zhen L, Li GA, Zhou JS, Yang DZ (2005) Micro-damage behaviors of Al-6Mg alloy impacted by projectiles with velocities of 1–3.2 km/s. Mater Sci Eng A 391:354–366

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Mondal C, Mishra B, Jena PK, Siva Kumar K, Bhat TB (2011) Effect of heat treatment on the behavior of an AA7055 aluminum alloy during ballistic impact. Int J Impact Eng 38:745–754

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Chen J, Zhen L, Yang S, Shao W, Dai S (2009) Investigation of precipitation behavior and related hardening in AA 7055 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 500:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Zhang W, He L, Lu Z, Kennedy GB, Thadhani NN, Li P (2020) Microstructural characteristics and formation mechanism of adiabatic shear bands in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy under dynamic shear loading. Mater Sci Eng A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Li Z, Zhao S, Alotaibi SM, Liu Y, Wang B, Meyers MA (2018) Adiabatic shear localization in the CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater 151:424–431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Weaver JS, Livescu V, Mara NA (2020) A comparison of adiabatic shear bands in wrought and additively manufactured 316L stainless steel using nanoindentation and electron backscatter diffraction. J Mater Sci 55:1738–1752

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wang BF (2008) Adiabatic shear band in a Ti-3Al-5Mo-4.5V titanium alloy. J Mater Sci 43:1576–1582

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Wen K, Fan Y, Wang G, Jin L, Li X, Li Z et al (2016) Aging behavior and precipitate characterization of a high Zn-containing Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy with various tempers. Mater Design 101:16–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Bendo A, Matsuda K, Lee S, Nishimura K, Nunomura N, Toda H et al (2018) Atomic scale HAADF-STEM study of η′ and η phases in peak-aged Al–Zn–Mg alloys. J Mater Sci 53:4598–4611

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Lloyd DJ, Chaturvedi MC (1982) A calorimetric study of aluminium alloy AA-7075. J Mater Sci 17:1819–1824

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Andrade U, Meyers MA, Vecchio KS, Chokshi AH (1994) Dynamic recrystallization in high-strain, high-strain-rate plastic deformation of copper. Acta Metal Mater 42:3183–3195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Edwards NJ, Song W, Cimpoeru SJ, Ruan D, Lu G, Herzig N (2018) Mechanical and microstructural properties of 2024–T351 aluminium using a hat-shaped specimen at high strain rates. Mater Sci Eng A 720:203–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Lifshitz JM, Leber H (1994) Data processing in the split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Int J Impact Eng 15:723–733

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Lins JFC, Sandim HRZ, Kestenbach HJ, Raabe D, Vecchio KS (2007) A microstructural investigation of adiabatic shear bands in an interstitial free steel. Mater Sci Eng A 457:205–218

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Li DH, Yang Y, Xu T, Zheng HG, Zhu QS, Zhang QM (2010) Observation of the microstructure in the adiabatic shear band of 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527:3529–3535

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Jiang L, Yang Y, Wang Z, Hu H (2018) Microstructure evolution within adiabatic shear band in peak aged ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 711:317–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Gourdet S, Montheillet F (2003) A model of continuous dynamic recrystallization. Acta Mater 51:2685–2699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Rittel D, Zhang LH, Osovski S (2017) Mechanical characterization of impact-induced dynamically recrystallized nanophase. Phys Rev Appl 7:44012

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Zhang WL, Chen XF, Zhuo BC, Li PJ, He LJ (2018) Effect of strain rate and temperature on dynamic mechanical behavior and microstructure evolution of ultra-high strength aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 730:336–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Hines JA, Vecchio KS (1997) Recrystallization kinetics within adiabatic shear bands. Acta Mate 45:635–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Hines JA, Vecchio KS, Ahzi S (1998) A model for microstructure evolution in adiabatic shear bands. Metall Mater Trans A 29:191–203

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Perez-Prado MT, Hines JA, Vecchio KS (2001) Microstructural evolution in adiabatic shear bands in Ta and Ta–W alloys. Acta Mater 49:2905–2917

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Lieou CKC, Mourad HM, Bronkhorst CA (2019) Strain localization and dynamic recrystallization in polycrystalline metals: thermodynamic theory and simulation framework. Int J Plast 119:171–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Nikulin I, Kipelova A, Malopheyev S, Kaibyshev R (2012) Effect of second phase particles on grain refinement during equal-channel angular pressing of an Al–Mg–Mn alloy. Acta Mater 60:487–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Maizza G, Pero R, Richetta M, Montanari R (2018) Continuous dynamic recrystallization (CDRX) model for aluminum alloys. J Mater Sci 53:4563–4573

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Nam CY, Han JH, Chung YH, Shin MC (2003) Effect of precipitates on microstructural evolution of 7050 Al alloy sheet during equal channel angular rolling. Mater Sci Eng A 347:253–257

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Li D, Golden BJ, O’Dowd NP (2014) Multiscale modelling of mechanical response in a martensitic steel: a micromechanical and length-scale-dependent framework for precipitate hardening. Acta Mater 80:445–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Ryen Ø, Holmedal B, Nijs O, Nes E, Sjölander E, Ekström H (2006) Strengthening mechanisms in solid solution aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 37:1999–2006

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Osovski S, Rittel D (2012) Microstructural heterogeneity and dynamic shear localization. Appl Phys Lett 101:22–286

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Contract No: 51471090, State Key Laboratory of Tribology under Contract No: SKLT2018003.

Author information




Dr. Weiliang Zhang planed the whole work, conducted the dynamic shear test experiments and drafted the initial version of manuscript. Dr. Liangju He assisted to interpret the data. Prof. Peijie Li revised the manuscript and contributed a lot to the discussion section.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiliang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this is authors’ original work and there are no conflicts of interest exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., He, L. & Li, P. Effect of aging status on susceptibility of adiabatic shear localization in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. J Mater Sci 55, 13329–13341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04914-x

Download citation