Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of particle breakage during the preparation steps of Co/Al2O3 catalysts

  • Ceramics
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fischer–Tropsch reaction is applied to produce ultra-clean fuels based on the synthesis gases. Supported cobalt catalysts are used for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis due to their high stability and good catalytic activity. These catalysts are generally prepared by wet chemical methods which involve impregnation, drying and calcination. A new approach to the analysis of degradation of catalysts under thermal stress during the various steps of catalyst preparation has been applied to the support (γ-Al2O3) and to the catalysts (10 wt% Co/Al2O3). Low particle damages occur when the catalyst is prepared by impregnation. Thus, a rate of about 1 wt% of fine particles with sizes less than 63 µm has been quantified. However, the effect of temperature during drying at 100 °C and calcination at 400 °C becomes significant: a degradation rate of 2% and 5% is noted for temperatures of 100 °C and 400 °C, respectively. These results show particle degradation through cleavage and fragmentation. These mechanisms result in the initial heterogeneous structure (fractures and cracks) of the support which reduces the mechanical resistance of the catalyst and initiates the rupture of the particles under an increase in temperature. To describe the particle breakage, a numerical approach was implemented under thermal stresses on modeled Co/Al2O3 ring particles. Calculations were performed using COMSOL Multiphysics® (Structural Mechanics Module) following a 2D geometry. The effect of temperature, crack height (radial and axial components) and porosity on the particle breakage were studied. The results obtained highlighted the solid breakage at high temperature (calcination phase), high-size cracks and low porosity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khodakov AY, Chu W, Fongarland P (2007) Advances in the development of novel cobalt Fischer–Tropsch catalysts for synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons and clean fuels. Chem Rev 107:1692–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X, Zhang C (2014) The impacts of global oil price shocks on China’s fundamental industries. Energy Policy 68:394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Werther J, Reppenhagen J (1999) Catalyst attrition in fluidized-bed systems. AIChE J 45:2001–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690450916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pham HN, Datye AK (2000) The synthesis of attrition resistant slurry phase iron Fischer–Tropsch catalysts. Catal Today 58:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00256-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bukur DB, Carreto-Vazquez VH, Ma W (2010) Catalytic performance and attrition strength of spray-dried iron catalysts for slurry phase Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Appl Catal Gen 388:240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bukur DB (2005) Attrition studies with catalysts and supports for slurry phase Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Catal Today 106:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei D, Zhang Y, Goodwin JG Jr (2000) The effect of pretreatment on the attrition resistance of spray-dried alumina. Appl Catal Gen 201:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00420-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rotan M, Rytter E, Einarsrud M-A, Grande T (2013) Solid state mechanism leading to enhanced attrition resistance of alumina based catalyst supports for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. J Eur Ceram Soc 33:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao R, Sudsakorn K, Goodwin JG Jr, Jothimurugesan K, Gangwal SK, Spivey JJ (2002) Attrition resistance of spray-dried iron F–T catalysts: effect of activation conditions. Catal Today 71:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei D, Goodwin JG Jr, Oukaci R, Singleton AH (2001) Attrition resistance of cobalt F–T catalysts for slurry bubble column reactor use. Appl Catal Gen 210:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00792-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Der Laan GP, Beenackers AACM (1999) Kinetics and selectivity of the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: a literature review. Catal Rev 41:255–318. https://doi.org/10.1081/CR-100101170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mochida I, Okuma O, Yoon S-H (2014) Chemicals from direct coal liquefaction. Chem Rev 114:1637–1672. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr4002885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulz H (1999) Short history and present trends of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Appl Catal Gen 186:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00160-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jahangiri H, Bennett J, Mahjoubi P, Wilson K, Gu S (2014) A review of advanced catalyst development for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of hydrocarbons from biomass derived syn-gas. Catal Sci Technol 4:2210–2229. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY00327F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dumond F, Marceau E, Che M (2007) A study of cobalt speciation in Co/Al2O3 catalysts prepared from solutions of cobalt − ethylenediamine complexes. J Phys Chem C 111:4780–4789. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp067781w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saeidi F, Tavares LM, Yahyaei M, Powell M (2016) A phenomenological model of single particle breakage as a multi-stage process. Miner Eng 98:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2016.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Liu H, Mao H (2017) DEM investigation of the effect of intermediate principle stress on particle breakage of granular materials. Comput Geotech 84:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiménez-Herrera N, Barrios GKP, Tavares LM (2018) Comparison of breakage models in DEM in simulating impact on particle beds. Adv Powder Technol 29:692–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raisianzadeh J, Mirghasemi AA, Mohammadi S (2018) 2D simulation of breakage of angular particles using combined DEM and XFEM. Powder Technol 336:282–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khodakov AY (2009) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: relations between structure of cobalt catalysts and their catalytic performance. Catal Today 144:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fatah N (2005) Étude des poudres cohésives fluidisation et simulation numérique. Habilitation à diriger des recherches. Edn. Université Lille1 - Sciences et Technologies

  22. Schlosser F (1998) Eléments de mécanique des sols. Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fatah N (2009) Study and comparison of micronic and nanometric powders: analysis of physical, flow and interparticle properties of powders. Powder Technol 190:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ziyani L, Fatah N (2014) Use of experimental designs to optimize fluidized bed granulation of maltodextrin. Adv Powder Technol 25:1069–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brabant C, Khodakov A, Griboval-Constant A (2017) Promotion of lanthanum-supported cobalt-based catalysts for the Fischer–Tropsch reaction. C R Chim 20:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2016.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Griboval-Constant A, Butel A, Ordomsky VV, Chernavskii PA, Khodakov AY (2014) Cobalt and iron species in alumina supported bimetallic catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch reaction. Appl Catal Gen 481:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.04.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashby MF, Jones DRH (2008) Matériaux. 1. Propriétés applications et conception, 3rd edn. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  28. Deng Z-Y, Fukasawa T, Ando M, Zhang G-J, Ohji T (2001) Microstructure and mechanical properties of porous alumina ceramics fabricated by the decomposition of aluminum hydroxide. J Am Ceram Soc 84:2638–2644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. David RL (2005) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 86th edn. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 6–93

    Google Scholar 

  30. Peng Z, Fuguo L (2009) Microstructure-based simulation of plastic deformation behavior of SiC particle reinforced Al matrix composites. Chin J Aeronaut 22:663–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Chevreul Institute (FR 2638), Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, Région Nord–Pas de Calais and FEDER are acknowledged for supporting and funding partially this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nouria Fatah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatah, N., Dhainaut, F. Analysis of particle breakage during the preparation steps of Co/Al2O3 catalysts. J Mater Sci 54, 14275–14286 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03918-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03918-6

Navigation