Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 17, pp 11604–11617 | Cite as

Graphene modified electrodes for bioelectricity generation in mediator-less microbial fuel cell

  • Alka PareekEmail author
  • J. Shanthi Sravan
  • S. Venkata Mohan
Energy materials


The present study comprises a facile and economical way of modifying carbon cloth anodes with electrochemically reduced graphene oxide employing dip coating method followed by electrochemical reduction technique without using any reducing agent. The physical characterization and validation of formation of electrochemically reduced graphene oxide and graphene oxide is accomplished using X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy techniques. Electrochemical properties of electrodes are assessed using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, which indubitably support higher charge storing capacity and lower charge transfer resistance in electrochemically reduced graphene oxide electrodes. Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide exhibits 17.5- and 8.75-times higher power density as compared to carbon cloth and graphene oxide, respectively. Synergistic effect of the large surface area for bacterial colonization and high conductivity of electrochemically reduced graphene oxide is responsible for its superior performance in a microbial fuel cell. The present work demonstrates power production with a cost-effective microbial fuel cell reactor configuration having graphene-based electrode as an anode, economic stainless steel as a cathode, inoculated with mixed culture and mere deionized water as catholyte, and such setup is essential for scaling up of microbial fuel cell to commercialization.



Authors wish to thank the Director, CSIR-IICT, for his encouragement in carrying out this work (Manuscript No. IICT/Pubs./2018/232). AP acknowledges funding from SERB-NPDF, DST. JSS acknowledges CSIR for providing research fellowship.


  1. 1.
    Wu X-T, Li J-C, Pan Q-R et al (2018) Gallic acid-assisted synthesis of Pd uniformly anchored on porous N-rGO as efficient electrocatalyst for microbial fuel cells. Dalt Trans 47:1442–1450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohan SV, Velvizhi G, Modestra JA, Srikanth S (2014) Microbial fuel cell: critical factors regulating bio-catalyzed electrochemical process and recent advancements. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:779–797. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohan SV, Raghavulu SV, Sarma PN (2008) Biochemical evaluation of production process from anaerobic wastewater treatment in a single chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC) employing glass wool membrane. Biosen Bioelectron 23:1326–1332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Logan B, Hamelers B, Arozendal R, Der U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006) Critical review microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40:5181–5192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reddy TB, Linden D (2011) Linden’s handbook of batteries. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang P-Y, Liu Z-L (2010) Experimental study of the microbial fuel cell internal resistance. J Power Sources 195:8013–8018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butti SK, Velvizhi G, Sulonen MLK et al (2016) Microbial electrochemical technologies with the perspective of harnessing bioenergy: maneuvering towards upscaling. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:462–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krishna KV, Mohan SV (2019) Purification and characterization of NDH-2 protein and elucidating its role in extracellular electron transport and bioelectrogenic activity. Front Microbiol 10:880. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yellappa M, Sravan JS, Sarkar O, Reddy YVR, Mohan SV (2019) Modified conductive polyaniline-carbon nanotube composite electrodes for bioelectricity generation and waste remediation. Biores Tech 284:148–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hou J, Liu Z, Zhang P (2013) A new method for fabrication of graphene/polyaniline nanocomplex modified microbial fuel cell anodes. J Power Sources 224:139–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Logan BE (2006) Special section: microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 40:5162.
  12. 12.
    Tsai H-Y, Hsu W-H, Liao Y-J (2018) Effect of electrode coating with graphene suspension on power generation of microbial fuel cells. Coatings 87:243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azuma M, Ojima Y (2018) Catalyst development of microbial fuel cells for renewable-energy production. IntechOpen. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohamed HO, Obaid M, Yasin AS et al (2016) Electrodepositing technique for improving the performance of crystalline and amorphous carbonaceous anodes for MFCs. RSC Adv 6:111657–111665. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xie X, Hu L, Pasta M et al (2011) Three-dimensional carbon nanotube: textile anode for high-performance microbial fuel cells. Nano Lett 11:291–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohanakrishna G, Krishna Mohan S, Venkata Mohan S (2012) Carbon based nanotubes and nanopowder as impregnated electrode structures for enhanced power generation: evaluation with real field wastewater. Appl Energy 95:31–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu Y, Lian H, Zu L et al (2016) Durable electromechanical actuator based on graphene oxide with in situ reduced graphene oxide electrodes. J Mater Sci 51:1376–1381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang W, Yuan Y, Yang J et al (2018) Hierarchical core–shell Co3O4/graphene hybrid fibers: potential electrodes for supercapacitors. J Mater Sci 53:6116–6123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wan L, Wang B, Wang S et al (2015) Well-dispersed PEDOT:pSS/graphene nanocomposites synthesized by in situ polymerization as counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Sci 50:2148–2157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Basu S, Lee MC, Wang Y-H (2014) Graphene-based electrodes for enhanced organic thin film transistors based on pentacene. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:16701–16710. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meng X, Yu C, Song X et al (2015) Graphene nanoribbons: nitrogen-doped graphene nanoribbons with surface enriched active sites and enhanced performance for dye-sensitized solar cells (Adv. Energy Mater. 11/2015). Adv Energy Mater. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garino N, Sacco A, Castellino M et al (2016) Microwave-assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/SnO2 nanocomposite for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells Microwave-assisted synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/SnO2 nanocomposite for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:4633–4643. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gautam RK, Bhattacharjee H, Venkata Mohan S, Verma A (2016) Nitrogen doped graphene supported α-MnO2 nanorods for efficient ORR in a microbial fuel cell. RSC Adv 6:110091–110101. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Han TH, Parveen N, Ansari SA et al (2016) Electrochemically synthesized sulfur-doped graphene as a superior metal-free cathodic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. RSC Adv 6:103446–103454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Y, Mo G, Li X et al (2011) A graphene modified anode to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 196:5402–5407. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiao L, Damien J, Luo J et al (2012) Crumpled graphene particles for microbial fuel cell electrodes. J Power Sources 208:187–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta B, Kumar N, Panda K et al (2017) Role of oxygen functional groups in reduced graphene oxide for lubrication. Sci Rep 7:45030. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dimiev AM, Tour JM (2014) Mechanism of graphene oxide formation. ACS Nano 8:3060–3068. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Venkata Mohan S, Veer Raghavulu S, Sarma PN (2008) Biochemical evaluation of bioelectricity production process from anaerobic wastewater treatment in a single chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC) employing glass wool membrane. Biosens Bioelectron 23:1326–1332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shanthi Sravan J, Butti SK, Verma A, Venkata Mohan S (2017) Phasic availability of terminal electron acceptor on oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 242:101–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mohanakrishna G, Butti SK, Kannaiah Goud R, Venkata Mohan S (2017) Spatiometabolic stratification of anoxic biofilm in prototype bioelectrogenic system. Bioelectrochemistry 115:11–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Min B, Kim J, Oh S et al (2005) Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells. Water Res 39:4961–4968. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kondaveeti S, Min B (2013) Nitrate reduction with biotic and abiotic cathodes at various cell voltages in bioelectrochemical denitrification system. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:231–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hou J, Liu Z, Yang S, Zhou Y (2014) Three-dimensional macroporous anodes based on stainless steel fiber felt for high-performance microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 258:204–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang X, Li K, Li H, Lu J (2013) Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate as reducing agent for the efficient reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets. J Colloid Interface Sci 409:1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thakur S, Karak N (2012) Green reduction of graphene oxide by aqueous phytoextracts. Carbon N Y 50:5331–5339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cao J, He P, Mohammed MA et al (2017) Two-step electrochemical intercalation and oxidation of graphite for the mass production of graphene oxide. J Am Chem Soc 139:17446–17456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dato A, Radmilovic V, Lee Z et al (2008) Substrate-free gas-phase synthesis of graphene sheets. Nano Lett 8:2012–2016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferrari AC (2007) Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun 143:47–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhu C, Guo S, Fang Y, Dong S (2010) Reducing sugar: new functional molecules for the green synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano 4:2429–2437. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cançado LG, Takai K, Enoki T et al (2006) General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 88:163106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang J, Gunasekaran S (2013) Electrochemically reduced graphene oxide sheets for use in high performance supercapacitors. Carbon 51:36–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nian Y-R, Teng H (2002) Nitric acid modification of activated carbon electrodes for improvement of electrochemical capacitance. J Electrochem Soc 149:A1008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vickery BJL, Patil AJ, Mann S (2009) Fabrication of graphene–polymer nanocomposites with higher-order three-dimensional architectures. Adv Mater 21:2180–2184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Das S, Sudhagar P, Verma V et al (2011) Amplifying charge-transfer characteristics of graphene for triiodide reduction in dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Funct Mater 21:3729–3736. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ramar A, Saraswathi R, Vilian ATE et al (2017) Polyisothianaphthene/graphene nanocomposite as a new counter electrode material for high performance dye sensitized solar cell. Synth Metals 230:58–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bhardwaj SK, Yadav P, Ghosh S et al (2016) Biosensing test-bed using electrochemically deposited reduced graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:24350–24360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006) Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure. Electrochem Commun 8:489–494. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Burkitt R, Whiffen TR, Yu EH (2016) Iron phthalocyanine and MnOx composite catalysts for microbial fuel cell applications. Appl Catal B Environ 181:279–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Song R-B, Yan K, Lin Z-Q et al (2016) Inkjet-printed porous polyaniline gel as an efficient anode for microbial fuel cells. J Mater Chem A 4:14555–14559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Xie X, Yu G, Liu N et al (2012) Graphene–sponges as high-performance low-cost anodes for microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 5:6862–6866. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Liu J, Qiao Y, Guo CX et al (2012) Graphene/carbon cloth anode for high-performance mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 114:275–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Science E, Science P (2008) On the use of cyclic voltammetry for the study of anodic electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 1:144–147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Islam MA, Ethiraj B, Cheng CK et al (2018) Enhanced current generation using mutualistic interaction of yeast-bacterial coculture in dual chamber microbial fuel cell. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:813–821. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Houghton J, Santoro C, Soavi F et al (2016) Supercapacitive microbial fuel cell: characterization and analysis for improved charge storage/delivery performance. Bioresour Technol 218:552–560. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Deeke A, Sleutels THJA, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2012) Capacitive bioanodes enable renewable energy storage in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 46:3554–3560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioengineering and Environmental Science Lab, CEEFFCSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology (CSIR-IICT)HyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations