Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 14, pp 10442–10456 | Cite as

Superior strength and ductility of 316L stainless steel with heterogeneous lamella structure

  • Jiansheng Li
  • Yang Cao
  • Bo Gao
  • Yusheng Li
  • Yuntian Zhu


Strength and ductility are two of the most important mechanical properties for a metal, but often trade off with each other. Here, we report a 316L stainless steel with superior combinations of strength and ductility that can be controlled by fine-tuning its heterogeneous lamella structure (HLS). The HLS was produced by 85% cold rolling, which produced lamellar coarse grains sandwiched between mixtures of nano-grains and nano-twins. The HLS was fine-tuned by annealing at 750 °C for 5–25 min, which resulted in varying volume fractions of nano-grains, nano-twins, lamellar coarse grains, and recrystallized grains. During tensile testing, large amount of geometrically necessary dislocations were generated near the heterostructure interfaces to coordinate the deformation between soft domains and hard domains, which results in high back stress to achieve superior combination of strength and ductility. An optimal high yield strength of ~ 1 GPa with an elongation-to-failure of ~ 20% was obtained for an optimized HLS sample. Furthermore, the processing technique employed here is conducive to large-scale industrial production at low cost.



The authors acknowledge the financial support of National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0204403), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51301092 and 51741106 (Yusheng Li), No. 51601094 (Yang Cao)), the Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro & Nano Materials and Technology, and the Pangu Foundation. Yuntian Zhu acknowledges the support of the US Army Research Office (W911 NF-17-1-0350). EBSD and TEM were performed in the Materials Characterization and Research Center of the Nanjing University of Science and Technology.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Lo KH, Shek CH, Lai JKL (2009) Recent developments in stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng R 65:39–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martienssen W, Warlimont H (2005) Springer handbook of condensed matter and materials data. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belyakov A, Kimura Y, Tsuzaki K (2006) Microstructure evolution in dual-phase stainless steel during severe deformation. Acta Mater 54:2521–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Odnobokova M, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2015) Effect of severe cold or warm deformation on microstructure evolution and tensile behavior of a 316L stainless steel. Adv Eng Mater 17:1812–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu K, Lu J (2004) Nanostructured surface layer on metallic materials induced by SMAT. Mater Sci Eng A 375–377:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen XH, Lu J, Lu L, Lu K (2005) Tensile properties of a nanocrystalline 316L austenitic stainless steel. Scr Mater 52:1039–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valiev RZ, Islamgaliev RK, Alexandrov IV (2000) Bulk nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation. Prog Mater Sci 45:103–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ueno H, Kakihata K, Kaneko Y, Hashimoto S, Vinogradov A (2011) Nanostructurization assisted by twinning during equal channel angular pressing of metastable 316L stainless steel. J Mater Sci 46:4276–4283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang CX, Yang G, Gao YL, Wu SD, Zhang ZF (2008) Influence of processing temperature on the microstructures and tensile properties of 304L stainless steel by ECAP. Mater Sci Eng A 485:643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang CX, Hu WP, Wang QY, Wang C, Yang G, Zhu YT (2015) An ideal ultrafine-grained structure for high strength and high ductility. Mater Res Lett 3:88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saito N, Mabuchi M, Nakanishi M, Shigematsu I, Yamauchi G, Nakamura M (2001) Application of equal channel angular extrusion on strengthening of ferritic stainless steel. J Mater Sci 36:3229–3232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    An XH, Lin QY, Wu SD, Zhang ZF, Figueiredo RB, Gao N, Langdon TG (2011) The influence of stacking fault energy on the mechanical properties of nanostructured Cu and Cu-Al alloys processed by high-pressure torsion. Scr Mater 64:954–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gubicza J, El-Tahawy M, Huang Y, Choi H, Choe H, Labar JL, Langdon TG (2016) Microstructure, phase composition and hardness evolution in 316L stainless steel processed by high-pressure torsion. Mater Sci Eng A 657:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma E, Zhu T (2017) Towards strength-ductility synergy through the design of heterogeneous nanostructures in metals. Mater Today 20:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu YT, Liao XZ (2004) Nanostructured metals: retaining ductility. Nat Mater 3:351–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu K (2016) Stabilizing nanostructures in metals using grain and twin boundary architectures. Nat Rev Mater 1:16019. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao YH, Bingert JF, Liao XZ, Cui BZ, Han K, Sergueeva AV, Mukherjee AK, Valiev RZ, Langdon TG, Zhu YT (2006) Simultaneously increasing the ductility and strength of ultra-fine-grained pure copper. Adv Mater 18:2949–2953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang TH, Li WL, Tao NR, Lu K (2011) Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 331:1587–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu XL, Jiang P, Chen L, Yuan FP, Zhu YT (2014) Extraordinary strain hardening by gradient structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7197–7201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu XL, Yang MX, Yuan FP, Chen L, Zhu YT (2016) Combining gradient structure and TRIP effect to produce austenite stainless steel with high strength and ductility. Acta Mater 112:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang MX, Pan Y, Yuan FP, Zhu YT, Wu XL (2016) Back stress strengthening and strain hardening in gradient structure. Mater Res Lett 4:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang Y, Chen M, Zhou F, Ma E (2002) High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419:912–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mahesh BV, Raman RKS, Koch CC (2012) Bimodal grain size distribution: an effective approach for improving the mechanical and corrosion properties of Fe-Cr-Ni alloys. J Mater Sci 47:7735–7743. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sekiguchi T, Ono K, Fujiwara H, Ameyama K (2010) New microstructure design for commercially pure titanium with outstanding mechanical properties by mechanical milling and hot roll sintering. Mater Trans 51:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ma XL, Huang CX, Moering J, Ruppert M, Hoppel HW, Goken M, Narayan J, Zhu YT (2016) Mechanical properties of copper/bronze laminates: role of interfaces. Acta Mater 116:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu XL, Yang MX, Yuan FP, Wu GL, Wei YJ, Huang XX, Zhu YT (2015) Heterogeneous lamella structure unites ultrafine-grain strength with coarse-grain ductility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:14501–14505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xing JX, Yuan FP, Wu XL (2017) Enhanced quasi-static and dynamic shear properties by heterogeneous gradient and lamella structures in 301 stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A 680:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yan FK, Liu GZ, Tao NR, Lu K (2012) Strength and ductility of 316L austenitic stainless steel strengthened by nano-scale twin bundles. Acta Mater 60:1059–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hirota N, Yin FX, Inoue T, Azuma T (2008) Recrystallization and grain growth behavior in severe cold-rolling deformed SUS316L steel under anisothermal annealing condition. ISIJ Int 48:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Belyakov A, Kipelova A, Odnobokova M, Shakhova I, Kaibyshev R (2014) Development of ultrafine grained austenitic stainless steels by large strain deformation and annealing. Mater Sci Forum 783–786:651–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu XL, Zhu YT (2017) Heterogeneous materials: a new class of materials with unprcedented mechanical properties. Mater Res Lett 5:527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tsakiris V, Edmonds DV (1999) Martensite and deformation twinning in austenitic steels. Mater Sci Eng A 273–275:430–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eskandari M, Najafizadeh A, Kermanpur A (2009) Effect of strain-induced martensite on the formation of nanocrystalline 316L stainless steel after cold rolling and annnealing. Mater Sci Eng A 519:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar BR, Das SK, Mahato B, Ghosh RN (2010) Role of strain-induced martensite on microstructural evolution during annealing of metastable austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Sci 45:911–918. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roland T, Retraint D, Lu K, Lu J (2007) Enhanced mechanical behavior of nanocrystallised stainless steel and its thermal stability. Mater Sci Eng A 445–446:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang HW, Wang ZB, Lu J, Lu K (2015) Fatigue behaviors of AISI 316L stainless steel with a gradient nanostructured surface layer. Acta Mater 87:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meyers MA, Xu YB, Xue Q, Perez-Prado MT, McNelley TR (2003) Microstructural evolution in adiabatic shear localization in stainless steel. Acta Mater 51:1307–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li YS, Tao NR, Lu K (2008) Microstructural evolutionand nanostructure formation in copper during dynamic plastic deformation at cryogenic temperatures. Acta Mater 56:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Donadille C, Valle R, Dervin P, Penelle R (1989) Development of texture and microstructure during cold-rolling and annealing of FCC alloys: example of an austenitic stainless steel. Acta Metall 37:1547–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schino AD, Kenny JM, Abbruzzese G (2002) Analysis of the recrystallization and grain growth processes in AISI 316 stainless steel. J Mater Sci 37:5291–5298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liu XC, Zhang HW, Lu K (2013) Strain-induced ultrahard and ultrastable nanolaminated structure in nickel. Science 342:337–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Arshad MA, Maaroufi AK (2015) Relationship between Johnson-Mehl-Avrami and Sestak-Berggren models in the kinetics of crystallization in amorphous materials. J Non-crystall Solids 413:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chowdhury SG, Das S, De PK (2005) Cold rolling behaviour and textural evolution in AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater 53:3951–3959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    An XH, Lin QY, Sha G, Huang MX, Ringer SP, Zhu YT, Liao XZ (2016) Microstructural evolution and phase transformation in twinning-induced plasticity steel induced by high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater 109:300–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kumar BR, Ghosh M (2007) Surface and mid-plane texture evolution in austenite phase of cold rolled austenitic stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A 457:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Odnobokova M, Kipelova A, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2014) Microstructure evolution in a 316L stainless steel subjected to multidirectional forging and unidirectional bar rolling. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 63:012060. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xue Q, Liao XZ, Zhu YT, Gray GT III (2005) Formation mechanisms of nanostructures in stainless steel during high-strain-rate severe plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng A 410–411:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Miura H, Kobayashi M, Todaka Y, Watanable C, Aoyagi Y, Sugiura N, Yoshinaga N (2017) Heterogeneous nanostructure developed in heavily cold-rolled stainless steels and the specific mechanical properties. Scr Mater 133:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Xue Q, Cerreta EK, Gray GT III (2007) Microstructural characteristics of post-shear localization in cold-rolled 316L stainless steel. Acta Mater 55:691–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hu J, Shi YN, Sauvage X, Sha G, Lu K (2017) Grain boundary stability governs hardening and softening in extremely fine nanograined metals. Science 355:1292–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yanushkevich Z, Lugovskaya A, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2016) Deformation microstructures and tensile properties of an austenitic stainless steel subjected to multiple warm rolling. Mater Sci Eng A 667:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ucok I, Ando T, Grant NJ (1991) Property enhancement in type 316L stainless steel by spray forming. Mater Sci Eng A 133:284–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wu XL, Jiang P, Chen L, Zhang JF, Yuan FP, Zhu YT (2014) Synergetic strengthening by gradient structure. Mater Res Lett 2:185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    You ZS, Li XY, Gui LJ, Lu QH, Zhu T, Gao HJ, Lu L (2013) Plastic anisotropy and associated deformation mechanisms in nanotwinned metals. Acta Mater 61:217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zhu T, Gao HJ (2012) Plastic deformation mechanism in nanotwinned metals: an insight from molecular dynamics and mechanistic modeling. Scr Mater 66:843–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhu YT, Liao XZ, Wu XL (2012) Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 57:1–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Eskandari M, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi HR (2013) An investigation into the room temperature mechanical properties of nanocrystalline austenitic stainless steels. Mater Des 45:674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Valiev RZ, Estrin Y, Horita Z, Langdon TG, Zehetbauer MJ, Zhu YT (2016) Fundamentals of superior properties in bulk nanoSPD materials. Mater Res Lett 4:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nano and Heterogeneous Materials Center, School of Materials Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations