Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 14, pp 10372–10382 | Cite as

Effect of temperature on the fracture surface morphology of Ti- and Zr-based bulk metallic glasses: exploring correlation between morphology and plasticity

  • M. T. Asadi Khanouki
  • R. Tavakoli
  • H. Aashuri
Metals

Abstract

According to previous studies on the fracture surface morphologies of bulk metallic glasses, the stable crack growth region width and vein pattern size increase with the plasticity at room temperature. In the present work, the fracture surface morphologies of Ti- and Zr-based bulk metallic glasses bent over a wide temperature range (0.1–0.8 glass transition temperature) are systematically analyzed. According to our finding, the stable crack growth region width increases while the vein pattern size decreases as the ductility improves by varying temperature. This observation is in contrast to the common thought that the ductility is proportional to the stable crack growth region width and vein pattern size simultaneously. Moreover, the vein pattern size and shear offset width are found to be almost equal at a specific temperature. Furthermore, smaller vein pattern size and shear offset width reduce shear band instability and, consequently, enhance the ductility.

Notes

Acknowledgements

M.T.A. would like to thank the support of the International Center for New-Structured Materials (ICNSM) and Laboratory of New-Structured Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, for its hospitality during his visiting period in this center. Furthermore, constructive discussions and suggestions by Prof. Jiang, Dr. Cao and Dr. Wang during this period are greatly acknowledged. He also thanks the Iranian Ministry of Sciences and Materials Science and Engineering Department of Sharif University of Technology for financial support of his visit.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with the submitted work.

References

  1. 1.
    Schuh CA, Hufnagel TC, Ramamurty U (2007) Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater 55:4067–4109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby MF, Greer AL (2006) Metallic glasses as structural materials. Scr Mater 54:321–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argon AS, Salama M (1976) The mechanism of fracture in glassy materials capable of some inelastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng 23:219–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(76)90198-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    He Q, Shang JK, Ma E, Xu J (2012) Crack-resistance curve of a Zr–Ti–Cu–Al bulk metallic glass with extraordinary fracture toughness. Acta Mater 60:4940–4949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schroers J, Johnson WL (2004) Ductile bulk metallic glass. Phys Rev Lett 93:20–23.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.255506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xi XK, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Wang WH, Wu Y, Lewandowski JJ (2005) Fracture of brittle metallic glasses: brittleness or plasticity. Phys Rev Lett 94:25–28.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.125510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ravichandran G, Molinari A (2005) Analysis of shear banding in metallic glasses under bending. Acta Mater 53:4087–4095.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raghavan R, Murali P, Ramamurty U (2009) On factors influencing the ductile-to-brittle transition in a bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater 57:3332–3340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greer AL, Cheng YQ, Ma E (2013) Shear bands in metallic glasses. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 74:71–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2013.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Narasimhan R, Tandaiya P, Singh I, Narayan RL, Ramamurty U (2015) Fracture in metallic glasses: mechanics and mechanisms. Int J Fract 191:53–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-9995-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang QS, Zhang W, Inoue A (2007) Transition from plasticity to brittleness in Cu–Zr-based bulk metallic glasses. Mater Trans 48:1272–1275.  https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MF200620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu YH, Wang G, Wang RJ, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Wang WH (2007) Super plastic bulk metallic glasses at room temperature. Science 315:1385–1388.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewandowski JJ, Wang WH, Greer AL (2005) Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philos Mag Lett 85:77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500830500080474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demetriou MD, Launey ME, Garrett G, Schramm JP, Hofmann DC, Johnson WL, Ritchie RO (2011) A damage-tolerant glass. Nat Mater 10:123–128.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conner RD, Johnson WL, Paton NE, Nix WD (2003) Shear bands and cracking of metallic glass plates in bending. J Appl Phys 94:904–911.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1582555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conner RD, Li Y, Nix WD, Johnson WL (2004) Shear band spacing under bending of Zr-based metallic glass plates. Acta Mater 52:2429–2434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang G, Wang YT, Liu YH, Pan MX, Zhao DQ, Wang WH (2006) Evolution of nanoscale morphology on fracture surface of brittle metallic glass. Appl Phys Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2354011 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Narayan RL, Tandaiya P, Narasimhan R, Ramamurty U (2014) Wallner lines, crack velocity and mechanisms of crack nucleation and growth in a brittle bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater 80:407–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gu XJ, Poon SJ, Shiflet GJ, Lewandowski JJ (2010) Compressive plasticity and toughness of a Ti-based bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater 58:1708–1720.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qiao JW, Ma SG, Wang GY, Jiang F, Liaw PK, Zhang Y (2011) Tension-tension-fatigue behaviors of a Zr-based bulk-metallic-glass-matrix composite. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 42:2530–2534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0788-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Philo SL, Heinrich J, Gallino I, Busch R, Kruzic JJ (2011) Fatigue crack growth behavior of a Zr58.5Cu15.6Ni12.8Al10.3Nb2.8 bulk metallic glass-forming alloy. Scr Mater 64:359–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.10.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang G, Zhao DQ, Bai HY, Pan MX, Xia AL, Han BS, Xi XK, Wu Y, Wang WH (2007) Nanoscale periodic morphologies on the fracture surface of brittle metallic glasses. Phys Rev Lett 98:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.235501 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flores KM, Dauskardt RH (2006) Mode II fracture behavior of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass. J Mech Phys Solids 54:2418–2435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang C, Cao QP, Wang XD, Zhang DX, Ramamurty U, Narayan RL, Jiang JZ (2017) Intermediate temperature brittleness in metallic glasses. Adv Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605537 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suh J-Y, Conner RD, Kim CP, Demetriou MD, Johnson WL (2010) Correlation between fracture surface morphology and toughness in Zr-based bulk metallic glasses. J Mater Res 25:982–990.  https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2010.0112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tandaiya P, Narasimhan R, Ramamurty U (2013) On the mechanism and the length scales involved in the ductile fracture of a bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater 61:1558–1570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang ZF, Eckert J, Schultz L (2003) Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater 51:1167–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jiang MQ, Ling Z, Meng JX, Dai LH (2008) Energy dissipation in fracture of bulk metallic glasses via inherent competition between local softening and quasi-cleavage. Philos Mag 88:407–426.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786430701864753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murali P, Guo TF, Zhang YW, Narasimhan R, Li Y, Gao HJ (2011) Atomic scale fluctuations govern brittle fracture and cavitation behavior in metallic glasses. Phys Rev Lett 107:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.215501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh I, Guo TF, Narasimhan R, Zhang YW (2014) Cavitation in brittle metallic glasses—effects of stress state and distributed weak zones. Int J Solids Struct 51:4373–4385.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ngai K, León C (2002) Cage decay, near constant loss, and crossover to cooperative ion motion in ionic conductors: insight from experimental data. Phys Rev B 66:64308.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.064308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang Z, Ngai KL, Wang WH, Capaccioli S (2016) Coupling of caged molecule dynamics to Johari-Goldstein β-relaxation in metallic glasses. J Appl Phys 119:024902.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4939676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Asadi Khanouki MT, Tavakoli R, Aashuri H (2017) Effect of the strain rate on the intermediate temperature brittleness in Zr-based bulk metallic glasses. J Non Cryst Solids 475:172–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu HB, Shen X, Wang Z, Gu L, Wang WH, Bai HY (2012) Tensile plasticity in metallic glasses with pronounced β relaxations. Phys Rev Lett 108:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.015504 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lewandowski JJ, Greer AL (2006) Temperature rise at shear bands in metallic glasses. Nat Mater 5:15–18.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deibler LA, Lewandowski JJ (2012) Outer medium effects and fracture nucleation sites in model experiments to mimic fracture surface features of metallic glasses. Mater Sci Eng, A 538:259–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deibler LA, Lewandowski JJ (2010) Model experiments to mimic fracture surface features in metallic glasses. Mater Sci Eng, A 527:2207–2213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Takayama S, Maddin R (1975) Fracture of amorphous Ni–Pd–P alloys. Philos Mag 32:457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786437508219968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang Q, Zhang ST, Yang Y, Dong YD, Liu CT, Lu J (2015) Unusual fast secondary relaxation in metallic glass. Nat Commun 6:7876.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pan D, Inoue A, Sakurai T, Chen MW (2008) Experimental characterization of shear transformation zones for plastic flow of bulk metallic glasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14769–14772.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806051105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jiang F, Jiang MQ, Wang HF, Zhao YL, He L, Sun J (2011) Shear transformation zone volume determining ductile–brittle transition of bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater 59:2057–2068.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations