Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 12, pp 8963–8977 | Cite as

Effects of POSS functionalization of carbon nanotubes on microstructure and thermomechanical behavior of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites

  • Seyed Morteza Sabet
  • Hassan Mahfuz
  • Andrew C. Terentis
  • Majid Nezakat
  • Javad Hashemi


Surface modification of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is a promising method to control the properties of a CNT/polymer system. Recent research has been directed toward chemical attachment of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) moieties to the CNT surface. POSS modification of CNTs can affect both the quality of CNT dispersion in the matrix and the interactions between polymer chains and nanotubes at the interphase region. The goal of the current study is to investigate these effects. Accordingly, nanocomposites containing POSS-modified CNTs, unmodified CNTs, and POSS were fabricated by infusion of 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 wt% particles into a vinyl ester (VE) resin. Mechanical and thermal properties of experimental materials were evaluated using three-point bending, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis methods. The state of particle distribution/dispersion in VE matrix was also observed. Optical microscopic studies showed that both POSS/VE and CNT/VE nanocomposites possess local agglomeration. This was more extensive in CNT/VE system. However, CNT-POSS/VE systems showed a fine-textured microstructure with homogeneous distribution of CNT-POSS hybrids into VE resin. This indicates that the dispersibility of CNTs improved due to POSS functionalization. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fracture surfaces revealed apparent de-bonding of agglomerates from the matrix in both POSS/VE and CNT/VE system, which is in agreement with the observed drop in their fracture strain. On the other hand, SEM studies of nanocomposites containing POSS-modified nanotubes revealed formation of a 3D network of well-dispersed CNT-POSS hybrids. SEM analysis further indicated the occurrence of a fracture mechanism with enhanced interactions between individual CNTs and VE matrix. This stiff and flexible network of individual CNTs is responsible for enhancement in elastic modulus, glass transition, and thermal decomposition temperatures of CNT-POSS/VE nanocomposites.


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    Mallick PK (2008) Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thostenson ET, Ziaee S, Chou TW (2009) Processing and electrical properties of carbon nanotube/vinyl ester nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 69:801–804. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taillemite S, Pauer R (2009) Bright future for vinyl ester resins in corrosion applications. Reinf Plast 53:34–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McConnell VP (2010) Vinyl esters get radical in composite markets. Reinf Plast 54:34–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips SH, Haddad TS, Tomczak SJ (2004) Developments in nanoscience: polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-polymers. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 8:21–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang W, Müller AHE (2013) Architecture, self-assembly and properties of well-defined hybrid polymers based on polyhedral oligomeric silsequioxane (POSS). Prog Polym Sci 38:1121–1162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raimondo M, Russo S, Guadagno L et al (2015) Effect of incorporation of POSS compounds and phosphorous hardeners on thermal and fire resistance of nanofilled aeronautic resins. RSC Adv 5:10974–10986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu J, Zhu Y, Huang H, Lu J (2012) Recent advances in shape-memory polymers: structure, mechanism, functionality, modeling and applications. Prog Polym Sci 37:1720–1763. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuo SW, Chang FC (2011) POSS related polymer nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 36:1649–1696. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guadagno L, Naddeo C, Raimondo M et al (2017) Development of self-healing multifunctional materials. Compos Part B Eng 128:30–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guadagno L, Naddeo C, Raimondo M et al (2017) Influence of carbon nanoparticles/epoxy matrix interaction on mechanical, electrical and transport properties of structural advanced materials. Nanotechnology. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guadagno L, Vietri U, Raimondo M et al (2015) Correlation between electrical conductivity and manufacturing processes of nanofilled carbon fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B Eng 80:7–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma PC, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim JK (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 41:1345–1367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou T-W (2001) Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 61:1899–1912. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coleman JN, Khan U, Blau WJ, Gun’ko YK (2006) Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon N Y 44:1624–1652. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes–the route toward applications. Science 297:787–792. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jancar J, Douglas JF, Starr FW et al (2010) Current issues in research on structure-property relationships in polymer nanocomposites. Polym (Guildf) 51:3321–3343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rahmat M, Hubert P (2011) Carbon nanotube-polymer interactions in nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 72:72–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sabet SM, Mahfuz H, Hashemi J et al (2015) Effects of sonication energy on the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in a vinyl ester matrix and associated thermo-mechanical properties. J Mater Sci 50:4729–4740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sahoo NG, Rana S, Cho JW et al (2010) Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci 35:837–867. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meng L, Fu C, Lu Q (2009) Advanced technology for functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Prog Nat Sci 19:801–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tasis D, Tagmatarchis N, Bianco A, Prato M (2006) Chemistry of carbon nanotubes. Chem Rev 106:1105–1136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Datsyuk V, Kalyva M, Papagelis K et al (2008) Chemical oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y 46:833–840. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Balasubramanian K, Burghard M (2005) Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes. Small 1:180–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang RL, Wang CG, Liu L et al (2015) Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes/carbon nanotube/carbon fiber multiscale composite: influence of a novel hierarchical reinforcement on the interfacial properties. Appl Surf Sci 353:224–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen GX, Shimizu H (2008) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes grafted with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane and its dispersion in poly(l-lactide) matrix. Polym (Guildf) 49:943–951. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang B, Chen Y, Wang J et al (2010) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes covalently functionalized with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes for optical limiting. Carbon N Y 48:1738–1742. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tang Y, Gou J, Hu Y (2013) Covalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes with polyhedral oligomeric silsequioxane for superhydrophobicity and flame retardancy. Polym Eng Sci 53:1021–1030. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yadav SK, Mahapatra SS, Yoo HJ, Cho JW (2011) Synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid by utilizing click chemistry. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Damian CM, Ciobotaru CC, Garea SA, Iovu H (2013) Effect of POSS-NH2 functionalization of MWNTs on reinforcing properties in epoxy nanocomposites. High Perform Polym 25:566–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li QF, Xu Y, Yoon JS, Chen GX (2011) Dispersions of carbon nanotubes/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes hybrids in polymer: the mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding properties. J Mater Sci 46:2324–2330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun D, Li Q, Chen GX (2014) Preparation of core-shell structured carbon nanotube-silsesquioxane hybrids by a direct free-radical reaction. Mater Lett 120:90–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sabet SM, Mahfuz H, Terentis AC et al (2016) A facile approach to the synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotube-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) nanohybrids. Mater Lett 168:9–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    ASTM D790-10 (2010) Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials.
  35. 35.
    ASTM E1356-08 (2014) Standard test method for assignment of the glass transition temperatures by differential scanning calorimetry.
  36. 36.
    Shtein M, Nadiv R, Lachman N et al (2013) Fracture behavior of nanotube-polymer composites: insights on surface roughness and failure mechanism. Compos Sci Technol 87:157–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grady BP (2010) Recent developments concerning the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in polymers. Macromol Rapid Commun 31:247–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seyhan AT, Gojny FH, Tanoǧlu M, Schulte K (2007) Rheological and dynamic-mechanical behavior of carbon nanotube/vinyl ester-polyester suspensions and their nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 43:2836–2847. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Abdalla M, Dean D, Adibempe D et al (2007) The effect of interfacial chemistry on molecular mobility and morphology of multiwalled carbon nanotubes epoxy nanocomposite. Polym (Guildf) 48:5662–5670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kathi J, Rhee K-Y, Lee JH (2009) Effect of chemical functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane on mechanical and morphological properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40:800–809. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seyhan AT, Tanoǧlu M, Schulte K (2009) Tensile mechanical behavior and fracture toughness of MWCNT and DWCNT modified vinyl-ester/polyester hybrid nanocomposites produced by 3-roll milling. Mater Sci Eng, A 523:85–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Menczel JD, Prime RB (2008) Thermal Analysis of Polymers: fundamentals and Applications. Therm Anal Polym Fundam Appl. Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mahfuz H, Zainuddin S, Parker MR et al (2007) Enhancement of strength and stiffness of epoxy-based composites using nanoparticle infusion and high magnetic fields. Mater Lett 61:2535–2539. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ocean and Mechanical EngineeringFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations