Minimizing the charge recombination rate at the FTO/Zn2SnO4 interface by metal oxide semiconductors in DSSCs

Electronic materials
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Charge recombination at interfaces is one of the main factors that limit the power conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells. In this work, to reduce the charge recombination at the transparent conductive oxide/mesoporous Zn2SnO4 interface and then to improve the photovoltaic performance, different types of metal oxide semiconductor thin films (including SnO2, TiO2 and ZnO) are deposited on the FTO substrate by thermal evaporation method. The results reveal that in comparison with SnO2 and ZnO, the TiO2 dense layer acts as the most appropriate blocking layer for suppressing the charge recombination and increasing the short-circuit current density and power conversion efficiency of the fabricated device. Furthermore, because of the formation of energy barrier at the FTO/Zn2SnO4 interface, the charge recombination rate is minimized and the injected electrons from the excited dye molecules into the conduction band of Zn2SnO4 are accumulated in its conduction band which leads to upward shift of the Fermi level and increases open-circuit voltage. The maximum power conversion efficiency of 3.02% with short-circuit current density of 7.36 mA/cm2 and open-circuit voltage of 664 mV is obtained for the device comprising TiO2 blocking layer.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF), under Grant No. 95007269.

References

  1. 1.
    Shogh S, Mohammadpour R, Iraji zad A, Taghavinia N (2015) Nitrogen-doped submicron-size TiO2 particles as bifunctional light scatterers in dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys A 119:1283–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2016) Conductivity improvement of CuCrO2 nanoparticles by Zn doping and their application in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. Ceram Int 42:6664–6672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yong SM, Tsvetkov N, Larina L, Ahn BT, Kim DK (2014) Ultrathin SnO2 layer for efficient carrier collection in dye-sensitized solar cells. Thin Solid Films 556:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2017) Influence of TiO2 particle size and conductivity of the CuCrO2 nanoparticles on the performance of solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. Bull Mater Sci 40:1379–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pazoki M, Taghavinia N, Abdi Y, Tajabadi F, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A (2012) CVD-grown TiO2 particles as light scattering structures in dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv 2:12278–12285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaculine MM, Raj CJ, Das SJ (2013) Hydrothermal synthesis of highly crystalline Zn2SnO4 nanoflowers and their optical properties. J Alloys Compd 577:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shin SS, Kim DW, Hwang D, Suk JH, Oh LS, Han BS, Kim DH, Kim JS, Kim D, Kim JY, Hong KS (2014) Controlled Interfacial Electron Dynamics in Highly Efficient Zn2SnO4‐Based Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells. Chemsuschem 7:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2017) Boosting the photovoltaic performance of Zn2SnO4‐based dye‐sensitized solar cells by Si doping into Zn2SnO4. J Am Ceram Soc 100:5584–5592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asemi M, Suddar A, Ghanaatshoar M (2017) Increasing the specific surface area of Cr-doped TiO2 nanoparticles by controlling the drying time for DSSC applications. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28:15233–15238Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Song JL, Wang X (2016) Effect of incorporation of reduced graphene oxide on ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct 81:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiappima W, Testoni GE, Moraes RS, Pessoa RS, Sagas JC, Origo FD, Vieira L, Maciel HS (2016) Structural, morphological, and optical properties of TiO2 thin films grown by atomic layer deposition on fluorine doped tin oxide conductive glass. Vacuum 123:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2016) The influence of magnesium oxide interfacial layer on photovoltaic properties of dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys A 122:842–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sasidharan S, Soman S, Pradhan SC, Unni KNN, Mohamed AAP, Nairde BN, Saraswathy HUN (2017) Fine tuning of compact ZnO blocking layers for enhanced photovoltaic performance in ZnO based DSSCs: a detailed insight using β recombination, EIS, OCVD and IMVS techniques. New J Chem 41:1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park DW, Jeong Y, Lee J, Lee J, Moon SH (2013) Interfacial charge-transfer loss in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 117:2734–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suresh S, Unni GE, Ni C, Sreedharan RS, Krishnan RR, Satyanarayana M, Shanmugam M, Pillai VPM (2017) Phase modification and morphological evolution in Nb2O5 thin films and its influence in dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Surf Sci 419:720–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang H, Li P, Zhang J, Lin Y (2014) TiO2 compact layer for dye-sensitized SnO2 nanocrystalline thin film. Electrochim Acta 147:366–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alberti A, Pellegrino G, Condorelli GG, Bongiorno C, Morita S, Magna AL, Miyasaka T (2014) Efficiency enhancement in ZnO: Al-based dye-sensitized solar cells structured with sputtered TiO2 blocking layers. J Phys Chem C 118:6576–6585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Selopal GS, Memarian N, Milan R, Concina I, Sberveglieri G, Vomiero A, Appl ACS (2014) Effect of blocking layer to boost photoconversion efficiency in ZnO dye-sensitized solar cells. Mater. Interfaces 6:11236–11244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suresh S, Deepak TG, Ni C, Sreekala CNO, Satyanarayana M, Nair AS, Pillai VPPM (2016) The role of crystallinity of the Nb2O5 blocking layer on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. New J Chem 40:6228–6237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee S, Noh JH, Han HS, Yim DK, Kim DH, Lee JK, Kim JY, Jung HS, Hong KS (2009) Nb-doped TiO2: a new compact layer material for TiO2 dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 113:6878–6882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duong TT, Choi HJ, Yoon SG (2014) Zinc doped TiO2 blocking layer grown by nanocluster deposition for improved dye-sensitized solar cell performance. J. Alloys Compd. 591:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asemi M, Maleki S, Ghanaatshoar M (2017) Cr-doped TiO2-based dye-sensitized solar cells with Cr-doped TiO2 blocking layer. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 81:645–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hwang D, Jin JS, Lee H, Kim HJ, Chung H, Kim DY, Jang SY, Kim D (2014) Hierarchically structured Zn2SnO4 nanobeads for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci. Rep. 4:7353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2014) Preparation of CuCrO2 nanoparticles with narrow size distribution by sol–gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 70:416–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koninti RK, Palvai S, Satpathi S, Basua S, Hazra P (2016) Loading of an anti-cancer drug into mesoporous silica nano-channels and its subsequent release to DNA. Nanoscale 8:18436–18445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chalapathi U, Uthanna S, Raja VS (2015) Growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by a two-stage process—Effect of incorporation of sulfur at the precursor stage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 132:476–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaur G, Mitra A, Yadav KL (2015) Influence of oxygen pressure on the growth and physical properties of pulsed laser deposited Cu2O thin films. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26:9689–9699Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wei X (2017) AZO/Ag/AZO transparent flexible electrodes on mica substrates for high temperature application. Ceram Int 43:15442–15446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li BJ, Huanga LJ, Ren NF, Zhou M (2014) Titanium dioxide-coated fluorine-doped tin oxide thin films for improving overall photoelectric property. Appl Surf Sci 290:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chang S, Wang H, Lee LTL, Zheng S, Li Q, Wong KY, Wong WK, Zhu X, Wong WY, Xiao X, Chen T (2014) Panchromatic light harvesting by N719 with a porphyrin molecule for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem C 2:3521–3526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang Q, Chou TP, Russo B, Jenekhe SA, Cao G (2008) Aggregation of ZnO nanocrystallites for high conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:2402–2406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pradhan B, Batabyal SK, Pal AJ (2007) Vertically aligned ZnO nanowire arrays in Rose Bengal-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 91:769–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang M, Chen P, Baker RH, Zakeeruddin SM, Gratzel M (2009) The influence of charge transport and recombination on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemPhysChem 10:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abrari M, Ghanaatshoar M, Davarani SSH, Moazami HR, Kazeminezhad I (2017) Synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles by electrooxidation of tin in quaternary ammonium salt for application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys A 123:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gong J, Liang J, Sumathy K (2012) Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): fundamental concepts and novel materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5848–5860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharmaa GD, Suresh P, Mikroyannidis JA (2010) Quasi solid state dye-sensitized solar cells with modified TiO2 photoelectrodes and triphenylamine-based dye. Electrochim Acta 55:2368–2372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jayabal P, Gayathri S, Sasirekha V, Mayandic J, Ramakrishnan V (2015) Effect of electronic-insulating oxides overlayer on the performance of zinc oxide based dye sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 305:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang H, Wang B, Yu J, Hu Y, Xia C, Zhang J, Liu R (2015) Significant enhancement of power conversion efficiency for dye sensitized solar cell using 1D/3D network nanostructures as photoanodes. Sci Rep 5:9305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Parthiban S, Anuratha KS, Arunprabaharan S, Abinesh S, Lakshminarasimhan N (2015) Enhanced dye-sensitized solar cell performance using TiO2: Nb blocking layer deposited by soft chemical method. Ceram Int 41:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu J, Wang G, Fan J, Liu B, Cao S, Yu J (2015) g-C3N4 modified TiO2 nanosheets with enhanced photoelectric conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Power Sources 274:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nguyen TT, Nam TV, Cong BT (2014) Influences of metallic doping on anatase crystalline titanium dioxide: From electronic structure aspects to efficiency of TiO2-based dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC). Mater Chem Phys 144:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brennan TP, Tanskanen JT, Roelofs KE, To John WF, Nguyen WH, Bakke JR, Ding IK, Hardin BE, Sellinger A, McGehee MD, Bent SF (2013) TiO2 conduction band modulation with In2O3 recombination barrier layers in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 117:24138–24149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2016) Boosting the photovoltaic performance of Zn2SnO4-based dye-sensitized solar cells by Si doping into Zn2SnO4. Appl Phys A 122:853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Asemi M, Ghanaatshoar M (2017) Hydrothermal growth of one-dimensional Ce-doped TiO2 nanostructures for solid-state DSSCs comprising Mg-doped CuCrO2. J Mater Sci 52:489–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0348-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zaban A, Greenshtein M, Bisquert J (2003) Determination of the electron lifetime in nanocrystalline dye solar cells by open-circuit voltage decay measurements. ChemPhysChem 4:859–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laser and Plasma Research InstituteShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Solar Cells Research GroupShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations