Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 52, Issue 14, pp 8618–8629 | Cite as

Carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by spark plasma sintering

  • P. Cavaliere
  • B. Sadeghi
  • A. Shabani
Original Paper


Spark plasma sintering (SPS) has been recognized, in the recent past, as a very useful method to produce metal matrix composites with enhanced mechanical and wear properties. Obviously, the materials final properties are strongly related to the reinforcement types and percentages as well as to the processing parameters employed during synthesis. The present paper analyses the effect of 0.5 and 1% of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) addition on the mechanical and microstructural behavior of Al-based metal matrix composites produced via SPS. The results show that the carbon nanotubes addition results in an increase in porosity and an increase in strength with respect to pure SPSed aluminum.


Carbon Nanotubes Spark Plasma Sinter Aluminum Particle Aluminum Matrix Aluminum Powder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Koli DK, Agnihotri G, Purohit R (2014) A review on properties, behaviour and processing methods for Al–nano Al2O3 composites. Procedia Mater Sci 6:567–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khorshid MT, Jahromi SJ, Moshksar M (2010) Mechanical properties of tri-modal Al matrix composites reinforced by nano- and submicron-sized Al2O3 particulates developed by wet attrition milling and hot extrusion. Mater Des 31:3880–3884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hesabi ZR, Simchi A, Reihani SMS (2006) Structural evolution during mechanical milling of nanometric and micrometric Al2O3 reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A428:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casati R, Bonollo F, Dellasega D, Fabrizi A, Timelli G, Tuissi A, Vedani M (2014) Ex situ Al–Al 2 O 3 ultrafine grained nanocomposites produced via powder metallurgy. J Alloy Compd 615:S386–S388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tjong SC (2007) Novel nanoparticle-reinforced metal matrix composites with enhanced mechanical properties. Adv Eng Mater 9:639–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kang YC, Chan SLI (2004) Tensile properties of nanometric Al2O3 particulate-reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Chem Phys 85:438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sweet G, Brochu M, Hexemer R, Donaldson I, Bishop D (2015) Consolidationof aluminum-based metal matrix composites via spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A648:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Aqeeli N, Mendoza-Suarez G, Suryanarayana C, Drew R (2008) Development of new Al-based nanocomposites by mechanical alloying. Mater Sci Eng A 480:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suryanarayana C (2011) Synthesis of nanocomposites by mechanical alloying. J Alloy Compd 509:S229–S234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tjong SC, Ma ZY (2000) Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of in situ metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng R29:49–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peng Y, Zhi M, Tjong SC (2005) Structure, thermal and mechanical properties of in situ Al-based metal matrix composite reinforced with Al2O3 and Tic submicron particles. Mater Chem Phys 93:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    German R (1994) Powder metallurgy, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 367–371Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaucher S, Beffort O (2001) Bonding and interface formation in metal matrix composites, volume 9, MMC-Assess Thematic NetworkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dash K, Chaira D, Ray BC (2013) Synthesis and characterization of aluminium–alumina micro-and nano-composites by spark plasma sintering. Mater Res Bull 48:2535–2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghasali E, Alizadeh M, Ebadzadeh T (2016) Mechanical and microstructure comparison between microwave and spark plasma sintering of Al–B 4 C composite. J Alloy Compd 655:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghasali E, Pakseresht A, Rahbari A, Eslami-shahed H, Alizadeh M, Ebadzadeh T (2016) Mechanical properties and microstructure characterization of spark plasma and conventional sintering of Al–SiC–TiC composites. J Alloy Compd 666:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolff C, Mercier S, Couque H, Molinari A (2012) Modeling of conventional hot compaction and spark plasma sintering based on modified micromechanical models of porous materials. Mech Mater 49:72–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu Z-F, Zhang Z-H, Lu J-F, Korznikov AV, Korznikova E, Wang F-C (2014) Effect of sintering temperature on microstructures and mechanical properties of spark plasma sintered nanocrystalline aluminum. Mater Des 64:625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Munir ZA, Quach VD (2011) Electric current activation of sintering: a review of the pulsed electric current sintering process. J Am Ceram Soc 94:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Firesteina KL, Corthay S, Steinman AE, Matveev AT, Kovalskii AM, Sukhorukova IV, Golberg D, Shtansky DV (2017) High-strength aluminum-based composites reinforced with BN, AlB2 and AlN particles fabricated via reactive spark plasma sintering of Al–BN powder mixtures. Mater Sci Eng A681:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Babu K, Kallip K, Leparoux M, AlOgab KA, Maeder X, Rojas Dasilva YA (2016) Influence of microstructure and strengthening mechanism of AlMg5–Al2O3 nanocomposites prepared via spark plasma sintering. Mater Des 95:534–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tan Z, Wang L, Xue Y, Zhang P, Cao T, Cheng X (2016) High-entropy alloy particle reinforced Al-based amorphous alloy composite with ultrahigh strength prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater Des 109:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mula S, Mondal K, Ghosh S, Pabi SK (2010) Structure and mechanical properties of Al–Ni–Ti amorphous powder consolidated by pressure-less, pressure-assisted and spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A527:3757–3763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhanga J, Shi H, Cai M, Liu L, Zha P (2009) The dynamic properties of SiCp/Al composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering with powders prepared by mechanical alloying process. Mater Sci Eng A527:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sweet GA, Brochu M, Hexemer RL (2015) Consolidation of aluminum-based metal matrix composites via spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A648:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Daoush W, Francis A, Lin Y, German R (2015) An exploratory investigation on the in situ synthesis of SiC/AlN/Al composites by spark plasma sintering. J Alloy Compd 622:458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sadeghian Z, Lotfi B, Enayati MH, Beiss P (2011) Microstructural and mechanical evaluation of Al–TiB2 nanostructured composite fabricated by mechanical alloying. J Alloy Compd 509:7758–7763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mizuuchi K, Inoue K, Agari Y, Nagaoka T, Sugioka M, Tanaka M, Takeuchi T, Tani J, Kawahara M, Makino Y, Ito M (2012) Processing and thermal properties of Al/AlN composites in continuous solid–liquid co-existent state by spark plasma sintering. Compos Part B 43:1557–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Durowoju MO, Sadiku ER, Diouf S, Shongwe MB, Olubambi PA (2015) Spark plasma sintering of graphite–aluminum powder reinforced with SiC/Si particles. Powder Technol 284:504–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Diouf S, Molinari A (2012) Densification mechanisms in spark plasma sintering: effect of particle size and pressure. Powder Technol 221:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Devaraj S, Sankaran S, Kumar R (2013) Influence of spark plasma sintering temperature on the densification, microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-4.5 wt% Cu alloy. Acta Metall Sin 26:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Decker S, Martin S, Krüger L (2016) Influence of powder particle size on the compaction behavior and mechanical properties of a high-alloy austenitic CrMnNi TRIP steel during spark plasma sintering. Metall Mater Trans A47:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Olevsky EA, Froyen L (2009) Impact of thermal diffusion on densification during SPS. J Am Ceram Soc 92:s1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saheb N, Khan MS, Hakeem AS (2015) Effect of processing on mechanically alloyed and spark plasma sintered Al–Al2O3 nanocomposites. J Nanomater 16:609824Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grácio JJ, Picu CR, Vincze G, Mathew N, Schubert T, Lopes A, Buchheim C (2013) Mechanical behavior of Al–SiC nanocomposites produced by ball milling and spark plasma sintering. Metall Mater Trans A44:5259–5269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Garay J (2010) Current-activated, pressure-assisted densification of materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 40:445–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Casati R (2015) Aluminum matrix composites reinforced with alumina nanoparticles. Springer, Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27732-5_5 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    He F, Han Q, Jackson MJ (2008) Nanoparticulate reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites—a review. Int J Nanoparticles 1:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Asgharzadeh H, Simchi A, Kim HS (2011) Microstructural features, texture and strengthening mechanisms of nanostructured AA6063 alloy processed by powder metallurgy. Mater Sci Eng A528:3981–3989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Deng K, Shi J, Wang C, Wang X, Wu Y, Nie K, Wu K (2012) Microstructure and strengthening mechanism of bimodal size particle reinforced magnesium matrix composite. Compos Part A 43:1280–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pelleg J (2012) Mechanical properties of materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 197–198 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Innovation EngineeringUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly
  2. 2.Young Researchers and Elite club, Neyshabur BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIslamic Republic of Iran
  3. 3.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Marvdasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityMarvdashtIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations