Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 51, Issue 11, pp 5377–5387 | Cite as

Modification of PdO/CeO2–ZrO2 catalyst by MnO x for water–gas shift reaction: redox property and valence state of Pd

  • Yi Xiao
  • Xiaodong Wu
  • Shuang Liu
  • Jie Wan
  • Min Li
  • Duan Weng
  • Changqing Tong
Original Paper


A PdO/MnO x /CeO2–ZrO2 catalyst was prepared by a two-step impregnation method. PdO/CeO2–ZrO2, PdO/Al2O3, PdO/MnO x /Al2O3, CeO2–ZrO2, and MnO x /CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts were also prepared for reference. The textural and surface properties of the catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ultraviolet visible spectroscopy, and CO chemisorption. The redox properties and catalytic activity of the catalysts were evaluated by H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and water–gas shift (WGS) reaction measurements, respectively. The addition of manganese oxide enhances the WGS activity of PdO/CeO2–ZrO2 catalyst significantly. It is ascribed to the improved redox property of the catalyst arising mainly from the Mn–Ce interaction at the interface and the formation of metallic Pd species that resulted from interacting with manganese oxide.


CeO2 Manganese Oxide Oxygen Storage Capacity ZrO2 Catalyst Improve Redox Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education of China for the financial support 113007A, and Science and Technology Innovation Platform Funds of Fujian Province for the financial support 2013H2012. Moreover, we would also thank the Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of Ministry of Education for performing XPS measurement.

Supplementary material

10853_2016_9840_MOESM1_ESM.doc (253 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 253 kb)


  1. 1.
    Ratnasamy C, Wagner JP (2009) Water gas shift catalysis. Catal Rev 51:325–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Han Z, Wang J, Yan H, Shen M, Wang J, Wang W, Yang M (2010) Performance of dynamic oxygen storage capacity, water–gas shift and steam reforming reactions over Pd-only three-way catalysts. Catal Today 158:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tabakova T, Boccuzzi F, Manzoli M, Sobczak JW, Idakiev V, Andreeva D (2004) Effect of synthesis procedure on the low-temperature WGS activity of Au/ceria catalysts. Appl Catal B 49:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cornaglia L, Múnera J, Lombardo E (2015) Recent advances in catalysts, palladium alloys and high temperature WGS membrane reactors: a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:3423–3437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen CS, Lai TW, Chen CC (2010) Effect of active sites for a water–gas shift reaction on Cu nanoparticles. J Catal 273:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shishido T, Nishimura S, Yoshinaga Y, Ebitani K, Teramura K, Tanaka T (2009) High sustainability of Cu–Al–Ox catalysts against daily start-up and shut-down (DSS)-like operation in the water–gas shift reaction. Catal Commun 10:1057–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeong DW, Potdar HS, Shim JO, Jang WJ, Roh HS (2013) H2 production from a single stage water–gas shift reaction over Pt/CeO2, Pt/ZrO2, and Pt/Ce(1−x)Zr(x)O2 catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:4502–4507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruettinger W, Ilinich O, Farrauto RJ (2003) A new generation of water gas shift catalysts for fuel cell applications. J Power Sources 118:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bunluesin T, Gorte RJ, Graham GW (1998) Studies of the water-gas-shift reaction on ceria-supported Pt, Pd, and Rh: implications for oxygen-storage properties. Appl Catal B 15:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thinon O, Diehl F, Avenier P, Schuurman Y (2008) Screening of bifunctional water-gas shift catalysts. Catal Today 137:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panagiotopoulou P, Kondarides DI (2004) Effect of morphological characteristics of TiO2-supported noble metal catalysts on their activity for the water–gas shift reaction. J Catal 225:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roh HS, Jeong DW, Kim KS, Eum IH, Koo KY, Yoon WL (2011) Single stage water–gas shift reaction over supported Pt catalysts. Catal Lett 141:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ribeiro MC, Jacobs G, Graham UM, Azzam KG, Linganiso L, Davis BH (2010) Low temperature water–gas shift: differences in oxidation states observed with partially reduced Pt/MnOX and Pt/CeOX catalysts yield differences in OH group reactivity. Catal Commun 11:1193–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Farias AMD, Nguyen-Thanh D, Fraga MA (2010) Discussing the use of modified ceria as support for Pt catalysts on water–gas shift reaction. Appl Catal B 93:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang X, Gorte RJ, Wagner JP (2002) Deactivation mechanisms for Pd/ceria during the water–gas-shift reaction. J Catal 212:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo JY, Meng M, Yao JS, Li XG, Zha YQ, Wang X, Zhang TY (2009) One-step synthesis of nanostructured Pd-doped mixed oxides MOx-CeO2 (M = Mn, Fe Co, Ni, Cu) for efficient CO and C3H8 total oxidation. Appl Catal B 87:92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hinokuma S, Fujii H, Okamoto M, Ikeue K, Machida M (2010) Metallic Pd nanoparticles formed by Pd–O–Ce interaction: a reason for sintering-induced activation for CO oxidation. Chem Mater 22:6183–6190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colussi S, Gayen A, Farnesi Camellone M, Boaro M, Llorca J, Fabris S, Trovarelli A (2009) Nanofaceted Pd–O sites in Pd–Ce surface superstructures: enhanced activity in catalytic combustion of methane. Angew Chem 121:8633–8636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nagai Y, Hirabayashi T, Dohmae K, Takagi N, Minami T, Shinjoh H, Matsumoto SI (2006) Sintering inhibition mechanism of platinum supported on ceria-based oxide and Pt-oxide–support interaction. J Catal 242:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petallidou KC, Efstathiou AM (2013) Low-temperature water-gas shift on Pt/Ce1−xLaxO2−δ: effect of Ce/La ratio. Appl Catal B 140:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Letichevsky S, Tellez CA, de Avillez RR, da Silva MIP, Fraga MA, Appel LG (2005) Obtaining CeO2–ZrO2 mixed oxides by coprecipitation: role of preparation conditions. Appl Catal B 58:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zou ZQ, Meng M, Zha YQ (2009) Surfactant-assisted synthesis, characterizations, and catalytic oxidation mechanisms of the mesoporous MnOx–CeO2 and Pd/MnOx–CeO2 catalysts used for CO and C3H8 oxidation. J Phys Chem C 114:468–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jin M, Park JN, Shon JK et al (2012) Low temperature CO oxidation over Pd catalysts supported on highly ordered mesoporous metal oxides. Catal Today 185:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meng M, Lin P, Fu Y (1997) The catalytic removal of CO and NO over Co-Pt(Pd, Rh)/γ-Al2O3 catalysts and their structural characterizations. Catal Lett 48:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jeong DW, Potdar HS, Roh HS (2012) Comparative study on nano-sized 1 wt% Pt/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and 1 wt% Pt/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 catalysts for a single stage water gas shift reaction. Catal Lett 142:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Delimaris D, Ioannides T (2008) VOC oxidation over MnOx–CeO2 catalysts prepared by a combustion method. Appl Catal B 84:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kapteijn F, Singoredjo L, Andreini A, Moulijn JA (1994) Activity and selectivity of pure manganese oxides in the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Appl Catal B 3:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keramidas VG, White WB (1973) Raman spectra of oxides with the fluorite structure. J Chem Phys 59:1561–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gouadec G, Colomban P (2007) Raman spectroscopy of nanomaterials: how spectra relate to disorder, particle size and mechanical properties. Prog Cryst Growth Charact 53:1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laguna OH, Sarria FR, Centeno MA, Odriozola JA (2010) Gold supported on metal-doped ceria catalysts (M = Zr, Zn and Fe) for the preferential oxidation of CO (PROX). J Catal 276:360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ayastuy JL, Gurbani A, González-Marcos MP, Gutiérrez-Ortiz MA (2012) Selective CO oxidation in H2 streams on CuO/CexZr1−xO2 catalysts: correlation between activity and low temperature reducibility. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:1993–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu XD, Yu HN, Weng D, Liu S, Fan J (2013) Synergistic effect between MnO and CeO2 in the physical mixture: electronic interaction and NO oxidation activity. J Rare Earths 31:1141–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhou J, Yu L, Sun M, Lan B, Ye F, He J, Yu Q (2012) MnO2 nanosheet-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of β-MnO2 branchy structures. Mater Lett 79:288–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Deshpande PA, Hegde MS, Madras G (2010) Pd and Pt ions as highly active sites for the water–gas shift reaction over combustion synthesized zirconia and zirconia-modified ceria. Appl Catal B 96:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    de la Peña O’Shea V A, Alvarez-Galvan MC, Requies J, Barrio VL, Arias PL, Cambra JF, Güemez MB, Fierro JLG (2007) Synergistic effect of Pd in methane combustion PdMnOx/Al2O3 catalysts. Catal Commun 8:1287–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lin S, Yang X, Yang L, Zhou R (2015) Three-way catalytic performance of Pd/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2–Al2O3 catalysts: role of the different Pd precursors. Appl Surf Sci 327:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shen M, Yang M, Wang J, Wen J, Zhao M, Wang W (2009) Pd/support interface-promoted Pd–Ce0.7Zr0.3O2–Al2O3 automobile three-way catalysts: studying the dynamic oxygen storage capacity and CO, C3H8, and NO conversion. J Phys Chem C 113:3212–3221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li G, Li L, Yuan Y, Shi J, Yuan Y, Li Y, Zhao W, Shi J (2014) Highly efficient mesoporous Pd/CeO2 catalyst for low temperature CO oxidation especially under moisture condition. Appl Catal B 158:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Barakat T, Idakiev V, Cousin R, Shao GS, Yuan ZY, Tabakova T, Siffert S (2014) Total oxidation of toluene over noble metal based Ce, Fe and Ni doped titanium oxides. Appl Catal B 146:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abbas-Ghaleb R, Garbowski E, Kaddouri A, Gelin P (2006) Al18B4O33 aluminium borate: a new efficient support for palladium in the high temperature catalytic combustion of methane. Catal Today 117:514–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kalamaras CM, Americanou S, Efstathiou AM (2011) “Redox” vs “associative formate with –OH group regeneration” WGS reaction mechanism on Pt/CeO2: effect of platinum particle size. J Catal 279:287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Insorn P, Kitiyanan B (2015) Selective hydrogenation of mixed C4 containing high vinyl acetylene by Mn–Pd, Ni–Pd and Ag–Pd on Al2O3 catalysts. Catal Today 256:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jiang Z, Li L, Li M, Li R, Fang T (2014) Density functional theory study on the adsorption and decomposition of H2O on clean and oxygen-modified Pd (100) surface. Appl Surf Sci 301:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Henderson MA (2002) The interaction of water with solid surfaces: fundamental aspects revisited. Surf Sci Rep 46:1–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang GC, Tao SX, Bu XH (2006) A systematic theoretical study of water dissociation on clean and oxygen-preadsorbed transition metals. J Catal 244:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gladys MJ, El Zein AA, Mikkelsen A, Andersen JN, Held G (2008) Chemical composition and reactivity of water on clean and oxygen-covered Pd {111}. Surf Sci 602:3540–3549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Xiao
    • 1
  • Xiaodong Wu
    • 1
  • Shuang Liu
    • 2
  • Jie Wan
    • 1
  • Min Li
    • 3
  • Duan Weng
    • 1
  • Changqing Tong
    • 4
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Materials Science and EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  3. 3.Haier Group, Open Innovation CenterQingdaoChina
  4. 4.Redbud Innovation InstituteLongyanChina

Personalised recommendations