Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 52, Issue 8, pp 4197–4209 | Cite as

Effect of alloying on interfacial energy of precipitation/matrix in high-chromium martensitic steels

  • A. Fedoseeva
  • E. Tkachev
  • V. Dudko
  • N. Dudova
  • R. Kaibyshev
Interfaces and Intergranular Boundaries


The effect of cobalt, tungsten, and boron on interfacial energy of precipitate/ferritic matrix in the 9% Cr martensitic steels on the base of creep tests at 650 °C under different applied stresses ranging from 80 to 220 MPa was investigated. An interfacial energy of M23C6 carbides, the Laves phase particles, and MX carbonitrides was estimated by comparison of theoretical curves obtained by Prisma software for the model steels for the exposure time of 2 × 104 h with experimental data measured by TEM in the gage sections of crept specimens. Addition of 3 wt% Co to Co-free 9Cr2W steel led to about 1.7 times increase in the interfacial energy of M23C6 carbides and MX carbonitrides, whereas Co did not effect on the interfacial energy of the Laves phase. Increasing W from 1.5 to 3 wt% in the Co-containing steels led to increase in the interfacial energy of the Laves phase up to 0.78 J m−2 under long-term exposure, whereas it did not effect on the interfacial energy of M23C6 carbides and MX carbonitrides. In the steel with increased B up to 0.012 wt% and decreased N to 0.007 wt%, a strong decrease in the interfacial energy of M23C6 carbides to 0.12 J m−2 occurred. Change in the interfacial energy of the precipitates was analyzed in comparison with coarsening rate constant.


Interfacial Energy Lave Phase Ferritic Matrix M23C6 Carbide Prior Austenite Grain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors acknowledge with gratitude the financial support received through the Russian Science Foundation, under Grant No. 14-29-00173. The authors are grateful to the staff of the Joint Research Center, Belgorod State University, for their assistance with instrumental analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Abe F, Kern TU, Viswanathan R (2008) Creep resistant steels: Part I. Woodhead Publishing in Materials, Cambridge, England, pp 403–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaybyshev RO, Skorobogatykh VN, Shchenkova IA (2010) New martensitic steels for fossil power plant: creep resistance. Phys Met Metall 109:186–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitahara H, Ueji R, Tsuji N, Minamino Y (2006) Crystallographic features of lath martensite in low-carbon steel. Acta Mater 54:1279–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghassemi Armaki H, Chen R, Maruyama K, Igarashi M (2010) Premature creep failure in strength enhanced high Cr ferritic steels caused by static recovery of tempered martensite lath structures. Mater Sci Eng A 527:6581–6588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abe F (2009) Analysis of creep rates of tempered martensitic 9%Cr steel based on microstructure evolution. Mater Sci Eng A 510–511:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kostka A, Tak K-G, Hellmig RJ, Estrin Y, Eggeler G (2007) On the contribution of carbides and micrograin boundaries to the creep strength of tempered martensite ferritic steels. Acta Mater 55:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abe F (2005) Effect of fine precipitation and subsequent coarsening of Fe2W Laves phase on the creep deformation behavior of tempered martensitic 9Cr–W steels. Metall Mater Trans A 36:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taneike M, Sawada K, Abe F (2004) Effect of carbon concentration on precipitation behavior of M23C6 carbides and MX carbonitrides in martensitic 9Cr steel during heat treatment. Metall Mater Trans A 35:1255–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dudova N, Plotnikova A, Molodov D, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2012) Structural changes of tempered martensitic 9% Cr–2% W–3% Co steel during creep at 650 °C. Mat Sci Eng A 534:632–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prat O, Garcia J, Rojas D, Sauthoff G, Inden G (2013) The role of Laves phase on microstructure evolution and creep strength of novel 9% Cr heat resistant steels. Intermetallics 32:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prat O, Garcia J, Rojas D, Carrasco C, Inden G (2010) Investigations on the growth kinetics of Laves phase precipitates in 12% Cr creep-resistant steels: experimental and DICTRA calculations. Acta Mater 58:6142–6153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hald J, Korcakova L (2003) Precipitate stability in creep resistant ferritic steels—experimental investigations and modelling. ISIJ Int 43(3):420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kipelova A, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2012) Laves phase evolution in a modified P911 heat resistant steel during creep at 923 K. Mater Sci Eng A 532:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fedorova I, Belyakov A, Kozlov P, Skorobogatykh V, Shenkova I, Kaibyshev R (2014) Laves-phase precipitates in a low-carbon 9% Cr martensitic steel during aging and creep at 923 K. Mater Sci Eng A 615:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Isik MI, Kostka A, Yardley VA, Pradeep KG, Duarte MJ, Choi PP, Raabe D, Eggeler G (2015) The nucleation of Mo-rich Laves phase particles adjacent to M23C6 micrograin boundary carbides in 12% Cr tempered martensite ferritic steels. Acta Mater 90:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghassemi Armaki H, Chen R, Maruyama K, Igarashi M (2011) Creep behavior and degradation of subgrain structures pinned by nanoscale precipitates in strength-enhanced 5–12 Pct Cr ferritic steels. Metall Mater Trans A 42:3084–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsuchida Y, Okamoto K, Tokunaga Y (1995) Improvement of creep rupture strength of high Cr ferritic steel by addition of W. ISIJ Int 35:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li Q (2006) Precipitation of Fe2W Laves phase and modeling of its direct influence on the strength of a 12Cr–2W steel. Metall Mater Trans A 37:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fedoseeva A, Dudova N, Glatzel U, Kaibyshev R (2016) Effect of W on tempering behaviour of a 3%Co modified P92 steel. J Mat Sci 51:9424–9439. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0188-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fedorova I, Kostka A, Tkachev E, Belyakov A, Kaibyshev R (2016) Tempering behavior of a low nitrogen boron-added 9%Cr steel. Mater Sci Eng A 662:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaibyshev R, Mishnev R, Tkachev E, Dudova N (2016) Effect of Ni and Mn of the creep behavior of 9–10% Cr steels with low N and high B. Trans Indian Inst Met 69(2):203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fedoseeva A, Dudova N, Kaibyshev R (2016) Creep strength breakdown and microstructure evolution in a 3%Co modified P92 steel. Mater Sci Eng A 654:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fedoseeva A, Dudova N, Kaibyshev R (2016) Effect of tungsten on a dispersion of M(C, N) carbonitrides in 9% Cr steels under creep conditions. Trans Indian Inst Met 69(2):211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cipolla L, Danielsen HK, Venditti D, Di Nunzio PE, Hald J, Somers MA (2010) Conversion of MX nitrides to Z-phase in a martensitic 12% Cr steel. Acta Mater 58:669–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Danielsen HK, Di Nunzio PE, Hald J (2013) Kinetics of Z-phase precipitation in 9–12 pct Cr steels. Metall Mater Trans A 44:2445–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abe F (2008) Precipitate design for creep strengthening of 9% Cr tempered martensitic steel for ultra-supercritical power plants. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9(1):3002. doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/9/1/013002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Fedoseeva
    • 1
  • E. Tkachev
    • 1
  • V. Dudko
    • 1
  • N. Dudova
    • 1
  • R. Kaibyshev
    • 1
  1. 1.Belgorod State UniversityBelgorodRussia

Personalised recommendations