Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 52, Issue 8, pp 4309–4322 | Cite as

First-principles study on the effect and magnetism of iron segregation in Cu grain boundary

  • Fanshun Meng
  • Xiaoming Lu
  • Yongli Liu
  • Yang Qi
Original Paper


The atomic configurations and electronic structures of iron on CuΣ5 symmetrical tilt grain boundary (GB) have been studied based on the density functional theory. Different segregation positions of iron are considered. A weak tendency of iron segregating to GB is arrived due to the segregation energy. In addition, iron segregation shows a cohesion strengthening effect of Cu GB according to Rice–Wang model, which is mainly contributed by the charge redistribution. Finally, an enhancement of the local magnetic moment of iron in Cu GB or bulk or surface is explored due to larger atomic volume than the FCC iron crystal and the Cu atoms surrounding iron are slightly polarized by the doped iron. This study can enrich the understanding of the effects of iron on the cohesion of Cu–Fe alloy and also might supply an indirect guidance to expand the application of Cu–Fe alloy in electronic device manufacture field.


Grain Boundary Bond Critical Point Coincidence Site Lattice Fracture Path Local Magnetic Moment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the National Basic Researching Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB606403), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. N140108001) and Project of Education Department of Liaoning Province (Grant No. JL201615409). Computation time was provided by Shenyang Supercomputer Center at Institute of Metals Research.


  1. 1.
    Braspenning PJ, Zeller R, Lodder A, Dederichs PH (1984) Self-consistent cluster calculations with correct embedding for 3 d, 4 d, and some sp impurities in copper. Phys Rev B 29:703–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Razee SSA, Prasad R, Singru RM (1997) The electronic structure, and magnetic and structural properties of Fe–Cu and Fe–Ag alloys. J Phys: Condens Matter 9:94455–94466Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang JT, Zhou L, Kawazoe Y, Wang DS (1999) Ab initio studies on the structural and magnetic properties of FeCu superlattices. Phys Rev B 60:3025–3028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    James P, Eriksson O, Johansson B, Abrikosov IA (1999) Calculated magnetic properties of binary alloys between Fe Co, Ni, and Cu. Phys Rev B 59:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monzen R, Kita K (2002) Ostwald ripening of spherical Fe particles in Cu–Fe alloys. Phil Mag Lett 82:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wada N, Takamatsu K, Takeda M, Takeguchi M, Blanchin MG (2010) The microstructure and magnetic properties of nano-scale Fe magnetic particles precipitated in a Cu–Fe alloy. Int J Mat Res 101:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bao G, Chen Y, Ma J, Fang Y, Meng L, Zhao S, Wang X, Liu J (2015) Microstructure and properties of cold drawing Cu-2.5% Fe-0.2% Cr and Cu-6% Fe alloys. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A 16:622–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biselli C, Morris DG (1994) Microstructure and strength of Cu–Fe in situ composites obtained from prealloyed Cu–Fe powder. Acta metal Mater 42:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biselli C, Morris DG (1996) Microstructure and strength of Cu Fe in Situ composites after very high drawing strains. Acta Mater 44:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rawson A, Kisi E, Sugo H, Fiedler T (2014) Effective conductivity of Cu–Fe and Sn–Al miscibility gap alloys. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 77:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang S, Kontsevoi OY, Freeman AJ, Olson GB (2011) First principles investigation of zinc-induced embrittlement in an aluminum grain boundary. Acta Mater 59:6155–6167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu W, Han H, Ren C, Yin H, Zhou Y, Huai P, Xu H (2015) Effects of rare-earth on the cohesion of Ni Σ5 (012) grain boundary from first-principles calculations. Comput Mater Sci 96:374–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kart HH, Uludogan M, Cagin T (2009) DFT studies of sulfur induced stress corrosion cracking in nickel. Comput Mater Sci 44:1236–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamaguchi M, Shiga M, Kaburaki H (2005) Grain boundary decohesion by impurity segregation in a nickel-sulfur system. Science 307:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu GH, Zhang Y, Deng S, Wang T, Kohyama M, Yamamoto R, Liu F, Horikawa K (2006) Origin of intergranular embrittlement of Al alloys induced by Na and Ca segregation: grain boundary weakening. Phys Rev B 73:224115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yuasa M, Mabuchi M (2010) Effects of segregated Cu on an Fe grain boundary by first-principles tensile tests. J Phys: Condens Matter 22:505705Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yuasa M, Mabuchi M (2013) First-principles study in Fe grain boundary with Al segregation: variation in electronic structures with straining. Phil Mag 93:635–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rice JR, Wang JS (1989) Embrittlement of interfaces by solute segregation. Mater Sci Eng, A 107:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu R, Freeman AJ, Olson GB (1994) First principles determination of the effects of phosphorus and boron on iron grain boundary cohesion. Science 265:376–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geng WT, Freeman AJ, Olson GB (2001) Influence of alloying additions on grain boundary cohesion of transition metals: first-principles determination and its phenomenological extension. Phys Rev B 63:165415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lejček P, Šob M (2014) An analysis of segregation-induced changes in grain boundary cohesion in bcc iron. J Mater Sci 49:2477–2482. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7943-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tian ZX, Yan XJ, Xiao W, Geng WT (2009) Effect of lateral contraction and magnetism on the energy release upon fracture in metals: first-principles computational tensile tests. Phys Rev B 79:144114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liang S, Hao C, Shi Y (2015) The power of single atom catalysis. ChemCatChem 7:2559–2567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang X, Guo J, Guan P, Liu C, Huang H, Xue F, Dond X, Pennycook SJ, Chisholm MF (2013) Catalytically active single-atom niobium in graphitic layers. Nat Commun 4:1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kronberg ML, Wilson FH (1949) Secondary recrystallization in copper. AIME Trans 185:501–514Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Duscher G, Chisholm MF, Alber U (2004) Bismuth-induced embrittlement of copper grain boundaries. Nat Mater 3:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lozovoi AY, Paxton AT (2008) Boron in copper: a perfect misfit in the bulk and cohesion enhancer at a grain boundary. Phys Rev B 77:165413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kresse G, Furthmuller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rycroft CH, Grest GS, Landry JW, Bazant MZ (2006) Analysis of granular flow in a pebble-bed nuclear reactor. Phys Rev E 74:021306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu W, Ren C, Han H, Tan J, Zou Y, Zhou X, Huai P, Xu H (2014) First-principles study of the effect of phosphorus on nickel grain boundary. J Appl Phys 115:043706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang S, Kontsevoi OY, Freeman AJ, Olson GB (2010) Sodium-induced embrittlement of an aluminum grain boundary. Phys Rev B 82:224107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Všianská M, Šob M (2011) The effect of segregated sp-impurities on grain-boundary and surface structure, magnetism and embrittlement in nickel. Prog Mater Sci 56:817–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Geng WT, Freeman AJ, Wu R, Geller CB, Raynolds JE (1999) Embrittling and strengthening effects of hydrogen, boron, and phosphorus on a Σ5 nickel grain boundary. Phys Rev B 60:7149–7155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eberhart ME, Clougherty DP, MacLaren JM (1993) A theoretical investigation of the mechanisms of fracture in metals and alloys. J Am Chem Soc 115:5762–5767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Geng WT, Freeman AJ, Wu RQ (2001) Magnetism at high-index transition-metal surfaces and the effect of metalloid impurities: Ni(210). Phys Rev B 63:064427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Čák M, Šob M, Hafner J (2008) First-principles study of magnetism at grain boundaries in iron and nickel. Phys Rev B 78:054418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Všianská M, Šob M (2011) Magnetically dead layers at sp-impurity-decorated grain boundaries and surfaces in nickel. Phys Rev B 84:014418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rahman G, Kim IG, Bhadeshia HKDH, Freeman AJ (2010) First-principles investigation of magnetism and electronic structures of substitutional 3d transition-metal impurities in bcc Fe. Phys Rev B 81:184423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wachowicz E, Ossowski T, Kiejna A (2010) Cohesive and magnetic properties of grain boundaries in bcc Fe with Cr additions. Phys Rev B 81:094104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang L, Šob M, Wu Z, Zhang Y, Lu GH (2014) Characterization of iron ferromagnetism by the local atomic volume: from three-dimensional structures to isolated atoms. J Phys: Condens Matter 26:086002Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu R, Freeman AJ, Olson GB (1992) On the electronic basis of the phosphorus intergranular embrittlement of iron. J Mater Res 7:2403–2411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fanshun Meng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaoming Lu
    • 3
  • Yongli Liu
    • 1
  • Yang Qi
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Materials Physics and Chemistry, School of Materials Science and EngineeringNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina
  2. 2.School of ScienceLiaoning University of TechnologyJinzhouChina
  3. 3.School of Materials Science and EngineeringLiaoning University of TechnologyJinzhouChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of EducationNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations