Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 50, Issue 24, pp 7875–7883 | Cite as

Large-scale synthesis of porous graphene through nanoscale carbothermal reduction etching

  • Ming Zhang
  • Wen Xiao Bao
  • Xiao Li Liu
  • Bao Zhi Yu
  • Zhao Yu Ren
  • Jin Tao Bai
  • Hai Ming Fan
Original Paper

Abstract

Porous graphene, which features nanoscaled pores on the sheets, has shown great potential in many technologically important industries. However, the conversional approaches for the synthesis of porous graphene including high-energy techniques and template etching/growth methods are generally conducted on substrates with high cost and low throughput. Herein, we demonstrate a general and scalable synthetic method for porous graphene via carbothermal reduction reaction using monodisperse zinc oxide nanoparticles. The results indicate that ZnO nanoparticles were first attached on graphene oxide nanosheets by electrostatic interaction, and then undergone a carbothermal reduction reaction at 800 °C to produce the pores on the sheets. While graphene oxide nanosheets were thermally reduced to graphene, all the by-products (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and zinc) escaped from the final products simultaneously. The characterizations of the obtained porous graphene reveal that the pore size is about 11 nm, larger than that of ZnO nanoparticles (~5 nm), which is ascribed to the aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles (~20 nm) on the graphene oxide sheets. These results show the certain correlation among the sizes of pores, ZnO nanoparticles and ZnO aggregations, which gain insight into the controlling of pore size by choosing suitable etching agent.

Keywords

Graphene Oxide Carbothermal Reduction Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Porous Graphene LiOH Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21376192) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education China (Grant No. 20126101110017).

References

  1. 1.
    Seo JS, Whang D, Lee H, Jun Im S, Oh J, Jeon YJ, Kim K (2000) A homochiral metal-organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis. Nature 404:982–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis ME (2002) Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417:813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Torres-Costa V, Martin-Palma RJ (2010) Application of nanostructured porous silicon in the field of optics. A review. J Mater Sci 45:2823–2838. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4251-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumari S, Singh RP (2013) Glycolic acid-functionalized chitosan-Co3O4-Fe3O4 hybrid magnetic nanoparticles-based nanohybrid scaffolds for drug-delivery and tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 48:1524–1532. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6907-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smíšek M, Černý S (1970) Active carbon: manufacture, properties and applications. Elsevier Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sircar S, Golden TC, Rao MB (1996) Activated carbon for gas separation and storage. Carbon 34:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CT-W, Olson DH, Sheppard EW, McCullen SB, Higgins JB, Schlenker JL (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114:10834–10843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raimondo M, Perez G, Sinibaldi M, áDe Stefanis A, Tomlinson A (1997) Mesoporous M41S materials in capillary gas chromatography. Chem Commun 15:1343–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu YW, Murali S, Cai WW, Li XS, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22:3906–3924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang X, Zeng ZY, Fan ZX, Liu JQ, Zhang H (2012) Graphene-based electrodes. Adv Mater 24:5979–6004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS (2012) Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 112:6156–6214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garaj S, Hubbard W, Reina A, Kong J, Branton D, Golovchenko JA (2010) Graphene as a subnanometre trans-electrode membrane. Nature 467:190–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu YW, Murali S, Stoller MD, Ganesh KJ, Cai WW, Ferreira PJ, Pirkle A, Wallace RM, Cychosz KA, Thommes M, Su D, Stach EA, Ruoff RS (2011) Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene. Science 332:1537–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi BG, Chang SJ, Lee YB, Bae SJ, Kim HJ, Huh YS (2012) 3D heterostructured architectures of Co3O4 nanoparticles deposited on porous graphene surfaces for high performance of lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 4:5924–5930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han TH, Huang YK, Tan ATL, Huang JX (2011) Steam etched porous graphene oxide network for chemical sensing. J Am Chem Soc 133:15264–15267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bi HC, Xie X, Yin KB, Zhou YL, Wan S, He LB, Xu F, Banhart F, Sun LT, Ruoff RS (2012) Spongy graphene as a highly efficient and recyclable sorbent for oils and organic solvents. Adv Funct Mater 22:4421–4425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang JL, Wang JY, Wang CW, Zhang HN, Lu CX, Wang JZ (2015) Hierarchical porous graphene carbon-Based supercapacitors. Chem Mater 27:2107–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou M, Tian T, Li X, Sun X, Zhang J, Chen Y, Qin LC (2013) Supercapacitance of chemically converted graphene with composite pores. Chem Phys Lett 581:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fischbein MD, Drndić M (2008) Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets. Appl Phys Lett 93:113107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang YD, Boden SA, Bagnall DM, Rutt HN, Groot CH (2012) Helium ion beam milling to create a nano-structured domain wall magnetoresistance spin valve. Nanotechnology 23:395302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koenig SP, Wang L, Pellegrino J, Bunch JS (2012) Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 7:728–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bai JW, Zhang X, Jian S, Huang Y, Duan XF (2010) Graphene nanomesh. Nat Nanotechnol 5:190–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Safron NS, Brewer AS, Arnold MS (2011) Semiconducting two-dimensional graphene nanoconstriction arrays. Small 7:492–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Safron NS, Kim M, Gopalan P, Arnold MS (2012) Barrier-guided growth of micro-and nano-structured graphene. Adv Mater 24:1041–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou D, Cui Y, Xiao PW, Jiang MY, Han BH (2014) A general and scalable synthesis approach to porous graphene. Nat Commun. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5716 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strubel P, Thieme S, Biemelt T, Helmer A, Oschatz M, Brückner J, Althues H, Kaskel S (2015) ZnO hard templating for synthesis of hierarchical porous carbons with tailored porosity and high performance in lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Funct Mater 25:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spanhel L, Anderson MA (1991) Semiconductor clusters in the sol-gel process: quantized aggregation, gelation, and crystal growth in concentrated zinc oxide colloids. J Am Chem Soc 113:2826–2833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao PH, Li WL, Wang G, Yu BZ, Li XJ, Bai JT, Ren ZY (2014) Facile hydrothermal fabrication of nitrogen-doped graphene/Fe2O3 composites as high performance electrode materials for supercapacitor. J Alloy Compd 604:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhan ZY, Zheng LX, Pan YZ, Sun GZ, Li L (2012) Self-powered, visible-light photodetector based on thermally reduced graphene oxide-ZnO (rGO-ZnO) hybrid nanostructure. J Mater Chem 22:2589–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tuinstra R, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53:1126–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li XH, Zhu H, Feng J, Zhang JW, Deng X, Zhou BF, Zhang HL, Xue DS, Li FS, Mellors NJ, Li YF, Peng Y (2013) One-pot polylol synthesis of graphene decorated with size-and density-tunable Fe3O4 nanoparticles for porcine pancreatic lipase immobilization. Carbon 60:488–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kudin KN, Ozbas B, Schniepp HC, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA, Car R (2008) Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett 8:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McAllister MJ, Li JL, Adamson DH, Hannes CS, Abdala AA, Liu J, Herrera-Alonso M, Milius DL, Car R, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA (2007) Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite. Chem Mater 19:4396–4404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cao J, Qi GQ, Ke K, Luo Y, Yang W, Xie BH, Yang MB (2012) Effect of temperature and time on the exfoliation and de-oxygenation of graphite oxide by thermal reduction. J Mater Sci 47:5097–5105. doi: 10.1007/s10853-012-6383-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moon IK, Lee J, Ruoff RS, Lee H (2010) Reduced graphene oxide by chemical graphitization. Nat Commun 1:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li XH, Feng J, Du YP, Bai JT, Fan HM, Zhang HL, Peng Y, Li FS (2015) One-pot synthesis of CoFe2O4/graphene oxide hybrids and their conversion into FeCo/graphene hybrids for lightweight and highly efficient microwave absorber. J Mater Chem A 3:5535–5546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Larciprete R, Fabris S, Sun T, Lacovig P, Baraldi A, Lizzit S (2011) Dual path mechanism in the thermal reduction of graphene oxide. J Am Chem Soc 43:17315–17321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krishnamoorthy K, Mohan R, Kim SJ (2011) Graphene oxide as a photocatalytic material. Appl Phys Lett 98:244101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fonoberov VA, Balandin AA (2004) Origin of ultraviolet photoluminescence in ZnO quantum dots: confined excitons versus surface-bound impurity exciton complexes. Appl Phys Lett 85:5971–5973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen W, Yan L, Bangal PR (2010) Preparation of graphene by the rapid and mild thermal reduction of graphene oxide induced by microwaves. Carbon 48:1146–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Livneh T, Haslett TL, Moskovits M (2002) Distinguishing disorder-induced bands from allowed Raman bands in graphit. Phys Rev B 66:195110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nemanich RJ, Solin SA (1979) First-and second-order Raman scattering from finite-size crystals of graphite. Phys Rev B 20:392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cancado LG, Pimenta MA, Neves BRA, Dantas MSS, Jorio A (2004) Influence of the atomic structure on the Raman spectra of graphite edges. Phys Rev Lett 93:247401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fan ZJ, Zhao QK, Li TY, Ren YM, Feng J, Wei T (2012) Easy synthesis of porous graphene nanosheets and their use in supercapacitors. Carbon 50:1699–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liu C, Yu Z, Neff D, Zhamu A, Jang ZB (2010) Graphene-based supercapacitor with an ultrahigh energy density. Nano Lett 10:4863–4868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lei Z, Christov N, Zhao XS (2011) Intercalation of mesoporous carbon spheres between reduced graphene oxide sheets for preparing high-rate supercapacitor electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 4:1866–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Photonics & Photon-technologyNorthwest UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of Chemical EngineeringNorthwest UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations