Skip to main content
Log in

Large-scale synthesis of porous graphene through nanoscale carbothermal reduction etching

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Porous graphene, which features nanoscaled pores on the sheets, has shown great potential in many technologically important industries. However, the conversional approaches for the synthesis of porous graphene including high-energy techniques and template etching/growth methods are generally conducted on substrates with high cost and low throughput. Herein, we demonstrate a general and scalable synthetic method for porous graphene via carbothermal reduction reaction using monodisperse zinc oxide nanoparticles. The results indicate that ZnO nanoparticles were first attached on graphene oxide nanosheets by electrostatic interaction, and then undergone a carbothermal reduction reaction at 800 °C to produce the pores on the sheets. While graphene oxide nanosheets were thermally reduced to graphene, all the by-products (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and zinc) escaped from the final products simultaneously. The characterizations of the obtained porous graphene reveal that the pore size is about 11 nm, larger than that of ZnO nanoparticles (~5 nm), which is ascribed to the aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles (~20 nm) on the graphene oxide sheets. These results show the certain correlation among the sizes of pores, ZnO nanoparticles and ZnO aggregations, which gain insight into the controlling of pore size by choosing suitable etching agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seo JS, Whang D, Lee H, Jun Im S, Oh J, Jeon YJ, Kim K (2000) A homochiral metal-organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis. Nature 404:982–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis ME (2002) Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417:813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Torres-Costa V, Martin-Palma RJ (2010) Application of nanostructured porous silicon in the field of optics. A review. J Mater Sci 45:2823–2838. doi:10.1007/s10853-010-4251-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumari S, Singh RP (2013) Glycolic acid-functionalized chitosan-Co3O4-Fe3O4 hybrid magnetic nanoparticles-based nanohybrid scaffolds for drug-delivery and tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 48:1524–1532. doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6907-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smíšek M, Černý S (1970) Active carbon: manufacture, properties and applications. Elsevier Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sircar S, Golden TC, Rao MB (1996) Activated carbon for gas separation and storage. Carbon 34:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt KD, Chu CT-W, Olson DH, Sheppard EW, McCullen SB, Higgins JB, Schlenker JL (1992) A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc 114:10834–10843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raimondo M, Perez G, Sinibaldi M, áDe Stefanis A, Tomlinson A (1997) Mesoporous M41S materials in capillary gas chromatography. Chem Commun 15:1343–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu YW, Murali S, Cai WW, Li XS, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22:3906–3924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang X, Zeng ZY, Fan ZX, Liu JQ, Zhang H (2012) Graphene-based electrodes. Adv Mater 24:5979–6004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS (2012) Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 112:6156–6214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garaj S, Hubbard W, Reina A, Kong J, Branton D, Golovchenko JA (2010) Graphene as a subnanometre trans-electrode membrane. Nature 467:190–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu YW, Murali S, Stoller MD, Ganesh KJ, Cai WW, Ferreira PJ, Pirkle A, Wallace RM, Cychosz KA, Thommes M, Su D, Stach EA, Ruoff RS (2011) Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene. Science 332:1537–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi BG, Chang SJ, Lee YB, Bae SJ, Kim HJ, Huh YS (2012) 3D heterostructured architectures of Co3O4 nanoparticles deposited on porous graphene surfaces for high performance of lithium ion batteries. Nanoscale 4:5924–5930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han TH, Huang YK, Tan ATL, Huang JX (2011) Steam etched porous graphene oxide network for chemical sensing. J Am Chem Soc 133:15264–15267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bi HC, Xie X, Yin KB, Zhou YL, Wan S, He LB, Xu F, Banhart F, Sun LT, Ruoff RS (2012) Spongy graphene as a highly efficient and recyclable sorbent for oils and organic solvents. Adv Funct Mater 22:4421–4425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang JL, Wang JY, Wang CW, Zhang HN, Lu CX, Wang JZ (2015) Hierarchical porous graphene carbon-Based supercapacitors. Chem Mater 27:2107–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou M, Tian T, Li X, Sun X, Zhang J, Chen Y, Qin LC (2013) Supercapacitance of chemically converted graphene with composite pores. Chem Phys Lett 581:64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischbein MD, Drndić M (2008) Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets. Appl Phys Lett 93:113107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang YD, Boden SA, Bagnall DM, Rutt HN, Groot CH (2012) Helium ion beam milling to create a nano-structured domain wall magnetoresistance spin valve. Nanotechnology 23:395302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koenig SP, Wang L, Pellegrino J, Bunch JS (2012) Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 7:728–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai JW, Zhang X, Jian S, Huang Y, Duan XF (2010) Graphene nanomesh. Nat Nanotechnol 5:190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Safron NS, Brewer AS, Arnold MS (2011) Semiconducting two-dimensional graphene nanoconstriction arrays. Small 7:492–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Safron NS, Kim M, Gopalan P, Arnold MS (2012) Barrier-guided growth of micro-and nano-structured graphene. Adv Mater 24:1041–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou D, Cui Y, Xiao PW, Jiang MY, Han BH (2014) A general and scalable synthesis approach to porous graphene. Nat Commun. doi:10.1038/ncomms5716

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strubel P, Thieme S, Biemelt T, Helmer A, Oschatz M, Brückner J, Althues H, Kaskel S (2015) ZnO hard templating for synthesis of hierarchical porous carbons with tailored porosity and high performance in lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Funct Mater 25:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spanhel L, Anderson MA (1991) Semiconductor clusters in the sol-gel process: quantized aggregation, gelation, and crystal growth in concentrated zinc oxide colloids. J Am Chem Soc 113:2826–2833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao PH, Li WL, Wang G, Yu BZ, Li XJ, Bai JT, Ren ZY (2014) Facile hydrothermal fabrication of nitrogen-doped graphene/Fe2O3 composites as high performance electrode materials for supercapacitor. J Alloy Compd 604:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhan ZY, Zheng LX, Pan YZ, Sun GZ, Li L (2012) Self-powered, visible-light photodetector based on thermally reduced graphene oxide-ZnO (rGO-ZnO) hybrid nanostructure. J Mater Chem 22:2589–2595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuinstra R, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53:1126–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li XH, Zhu H, Feng J, Zhang JW, Deng X, Zhou BF, Zhang HL, Xue DS, Li FS, Mellors NJ, Li YF, Peng Y (2013) One-pot polylol synthesis of graphene decorated with size-and density-tunable Fe3O4 nanoparticles for porcine pancreatic lipase immobilization. Carbon 60:488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kudin KN, Ozbas B, Schniepp HC, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA, Car R (2008) Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett 8:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McAllister MJ, Li JL, Adamson DH, Hannes CS, Abdala AA, Liu J, Herrera-Alonso M, Milius DL, Car R, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA (2007) Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite. Chem Mater 19:4396–4404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cao J, Qi GQ, Ke K, Luo Y, Yang W, Xie BH, Yang MB (2012) Effect of temperature and time on the exfoliation and de-oxygenation of graphite oxide by thermal reduction. J Mater Sci 47:5097–5105. doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6383-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moon IK, Lee J, Ruoff RS, Lee H (2010) Reduced graphene oxide by chemical graphitization. Nat Commun 1:73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li XH, Feng J, Du YP, Bai JT, Fan HM, Zhang HL, Peng Y, Li FS (2015) One-pot synthesis of CoFe2O4/graphene oxide hybrids and their conversion into FeCo/graphene hybrids for lightweight and highly efficient microwave absorber. J Mater Chem A 3:5535–5546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Larciprete R, Fabris S, Sun T, Lacovig P, Baraldi A, Lizzit S (2011) Dual path mechanism in the thermal reduction of graphene oxide. J Am Chem Soc 43:17315–17321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Krishnamoorthy K, Mohan R, Kim SJ (2011) Graphene oxide as a photocatalytic material. Appl Phys Lett 98:244101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fonoberov VA, Balandin AA (2004) Origin of ultraviolet photoluminescence in ZnO quantum dots: confined excitons versus surface-bound impurity exciton complexes. Appl Phys Lett 85:5971–5973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen W, Yan L, Bangal PR (2010) Preparation of graphene by the rapid and mild thermal reduction of graphene oxide induced by microwaves. Carbon 48:1146–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Livneh T, Haslett TL, Moskovits M (2002) Distinguishing disorder-induced bands from allowed Raman bands in graphit. Phys Rev B 66:195110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nemanich RJ, Solin SA (1979) First-and second-order Raman scattering from finite-size crystals of graphite. Phys Rev B 20:392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cancado LG, Pimenta MA, Neves BRA, Dantas MSS, Jorio A (2004) Influence of the atomic structure on the Raman spectra of graphite edges. Phys Rev Lett 93:247401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fan ZJ, Zhao QK, Li TY, Ren YM, Feng J, Wei T (2012) Easy synthesis of porous graphene nanosheets and their use in supercapacitors. Carbon 50:1699–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu C, Yu Z, Neff D, Zhamu A, Jang ZB (2010) Graphene-based supercapacitor with an ultrahigh energy density. Nano Lett 10:4863–4868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lei Z, Christov N, Zhao XS (2011) Intercalation of mesoporous carbon spheres between reduced graphene oxide sheets for preparing high-rate supercapacitor electrodes. Energy Environ Sci 4:1866–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21376192) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education China (Grant No. 20126101110017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai Ming Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Bao, W., Liu, X. et al. Large-scale synthesis of porous graphene through nanoscale carbothermal reduction etching. J Mater Sci 50, 7875–7883 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9309-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9309-1

Keywords

Navigation