Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 50, Issue 14, pp 4879–4887 | Cite as

Importance of refrigeration time in the electrospinning of silk fibroin aqueous solutions

  • Salvador D. Aznar-Cervantes
  • A. Abel Lozano-Pérez
  • Mercedes García Montalbán
  • Gloria Víllora
  • Daniel Vicente-Cervantes
  • Jose L. Cenis
Original Paper

Abstract

Refrigeration is a common method for preserving reconstituted silk fibroin (RSF) aqueous solutions during electrospinning experiments, but the effects of preservation time at 4 °C are still not well documented. In this work, we explore its effects on the viscosity, refractive index, and density values of RSF solutions at 19 wt%. Also, extensive characterization of the mechanical properties and fiber diameters of the resulting electrospun meshes are provided. Significant differences were found in elongation, Young´s modulus, and ultimate strength at different experimental times, and an increase in the viscosity values of the RSF solutions was detected for the first 12 days of storage. These solutions exhibited a continuous, slow gelation throughout the time in storage at 4 °C, and this phenomenon improved the performance of electrospinning after a certain period of refrigeration. The protocol used reduces the production cost of SF fiber-based scaffolds and avoids the use of harsh solvents and additives which could otherwise limit their use in potential biomedical applications.

Keywords

Refrigeration Ultimate Strength Silk Fibroin Electrospun Fiber Fiber Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the European Commission (FEDER/ERDF), the Spanish MINECO Projects (MAT2011-24973 and CICYT CTQ2011-25613), and the SÉNECA foundation (1195/PI/09). Dr. A. Abel Lozano-Pérez’s research contract was partially supported (80 %) by the FEDER Operative Program of the Region of Murcia 2007–2013.

Supplementary material

10853_2015_9032_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1248 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nair LS, Bhattacharyya S, Laurencin CT (2004) Development of novel tissue engineering scaffolds via electrospinning. Expert Opin Biol Ther 4:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Megelski S, Stephens JS, Rabolt JF, Bruce CD (2002) Micro- and nanostructured surface morphology on electrospun polymer fybers. Macromolecules 35:8456–8466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hohman MM, Shin M, Rutledge G, Brenner MP (2001) Electrospinning and electrically forced jets I stability theory. Phys Fluids 13:2201–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fang X, Reneker DH (1997) DNA fibers by electrospinning. J Macromol Sci, Phys B36:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fong H, Reneker DH (2001) Electrospinning and formation of nanofibers. In: Salem DR (ed) Structure formation in polymeric fibers. Hanser, Munich, pp 225–246Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang F, Zuo BQ, Bai L (2009) Study on the structure of SF fiber mats electrospun with HFIP and FA and cells behavior. J Mater Sci 44:5682–5687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inoue S, Takara K, Arisaka F, Kimura S, Ohtomo K, Mizuno S (2000) Silk fibroin of Bombyx mori is secreted, assembling a high molecular mass elementary unit consiting of h-chain, l-chain, and P25, with a 6:6:1 molar ratio. J Biol Chem 275:40517–40528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X, Baughman CB, Kaplan DL (2008) In vitro evaluation of electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds for vascular cell growth. Biomaterials 29:217–2227Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Min BM, Lee G, Kim SH, Nam Y, Lee TS, Park WH (2004) Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 25:1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jin HJ, Chen J, Karageorgiou V, Altman GH, Kaplan DL (2004) Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials 25:1039–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baek HS, Park YH, Ki CS, Park JC, Rahd DK (2008) Enhanced chondrogenic responses of articular chondrocytes onto porous silk fibroin scaffolds treated with microwave-induced argon plasma. Surf Coat Technol 202:5794–5797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li C, Vepari C, Jin HJ, Kim HJ, Kaplan DL (2006) Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:3115–3124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park WH, Jeong L, Yoo DI, Hudson SD (2004) Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds: preparation and characterization of chitin/silk fibroin blend nanofibers. Polymer 45:7151–7157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aznar-Cervantes S, Roca MI, Martinez JG, Meseguer-Olmo L, Cenis JL, Moraleda JM, Otero TF (2012) Fabrication of conductive electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds by coating with polypyrrole for biomedical applications. Bioelectrochemistry 85:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang M, Yu JH, Kaplan DL, Rutledge GC (2006) Production of submicron diameter silk fibers under benign processing conditions by two-fluid electrospinning. Macromolecules 39:1102–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin HJ, Fridrikh SV, Rutledge GC, Kaplan DL (2002) Electrospinning Bombyx mori silk with poly(ethylene oxide). Biomacromolecules 3:1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen C, Chuanbao C, Xilan M, Yin T, Hesun Z (2006) Preparation of non-woven mats from all-aqueous silk fibroin solution with electrospinning method. Polymer 47:6322–6327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cao H, Chen X, Huang L, Shao Z (2009) Electrospinning of reconstituted silk fiber from aqueous silk fibroin solution. Mater Sci Eng, C 29:2270–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang X, Reagan MR, Kaplan DL (2009) Electrospun silk biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:988–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aznar-Cervantes S, Vicente-Cervantes D, Meseguer-Olmo L, Cenis J, Lozano-Pérez AA (2013) Influence of the protocol used for fibroin extraction on the mechanical properties and fiber sizes of electrospun silk mats. Mater Sci Eng, C 33:1945–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu X, Kaplan D, Cebe P (2006) Determining beta-sheet crystallinity in fibrous proteins by thermal analysis and infrared spectroscopy. Macromolecules 39:6161–6170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jose R, Elia R, Firpo MA, Kaplan DL, Peattie RA (2012) Axially aligned, fiber tubes, meshes, microbundles and gradient biomaterial constructs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:2679–2695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rockwood DN, Preda RC, Yücel T, Wang X, Lovett ML, Kaplan DL (2011) Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat Protoc 6:1612–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim UJ, Park J, Li C, Jin HJ, Valluzzi R, Kaplan DL (2004) Structure and properties of silk hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 5:786–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Le Zainuddin TT, Park Y, Chirila TV, Halley PJ, Whittaker AK (2008) The behavior of aged regenerated Bombyx mori silk fibroin solutions studied by H NMR and rheology. Biomaterials 29:4268–4274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang H, Zhang YP, Shao HL, Hu XC (2006) Structure of silk fibroin fibers made by an electrospinning process from a silk fibroin aqueous solution. J Appl Polym Sci 101:961–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yamada H, Nakao H, Takasu Y, Tsubouchi K (2001) Preparation of undegraded native molecular fibroin solution from silkworm cocoons. Mater Sci Eng C 14:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang M, Jin HJ, Kaplan DL, Rutledge GC (2004) Mechanical properties of electrospun silk fibers. Macromolecules 37:6856–6864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Min M, Jeong L, Lee KY, Park WH (2006) Regenerated silk fibroin nanofibers: water vapor-induced structural changes and their effects on the behavior of normal human cells. Macromol Biosci 6:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvador D. Aznar-Cervantes
    • 1
  • A. Abel Lozano-Pérez
    • 1
  • Mercedes García Montalbán
    • 2
  • Gloria Víllora
    • 2
  • Daniel Vicente-Cervantes
    • 1
  • Jose L. Cenis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyInstituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDA)MurciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of Murcia (UMU)MurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations