A comparative study of microstructure and mechanical behavior of CO2 and diode laser deposited Cu–38Ni alloy
- 387 Downloads
Cu–38Ni alloy was deposited on C71500 (Cu–30Ni) substrates by a laser-aided direct metal deposition technique using CO2 and diode lasers. Structure–property relationships of deposited specimens were investigated by optical microscopy, electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction techniques, and microhardness and tensile measurements. Laser-deposited specimens’ microstructures were primarily dendritic, forming columnar grains growing epitaxially from the substrate and subsequent layers along the preferred crystallographic growth. The grain growth pattern and grain size distribution was significantly different in both specimens. The lattice parameter of the solid solution phase was relatively larger in diode laser-formed specimen; CO2 laser-formed specimens showed relatively higher but non-uniform hardness distribution whereas a very uniform hardness distribution was observed in diode laser formed specimens. Diode laser formed specimens showed higher tensile properties compared to CO2 laser formed specimens which were comparable to C71500 substrates. Microstructure and mechanical behavior were explained based on laser processing parameters.
KeywordsDiode Laser Grain Size Distribution Select Area Electron Diffraction Pattern Alloy Specimen Powder Feed Rate
The current investigation was financially supported by the Office of Naval Research. Authors would like to thank the colleagues at the Electron Microscope Analysis Laboratory (EMAL) in University of Michigan and Focus: HOPE for their help in this work.
- 3.Drolenga LJP, Ijsseling FP, Kolster BH (1983) The influence of alloy composition and microstructure on the corrosion behaviour of Cu–Ni alloys in seawater. Mater Corros 34:167–178Google Scholar
- 5.Caron RN, Barth RG, Tyler DE (2004) ASM handbook online, vol 9. ASM International, Novelty, pp 775–788Google Scholar
- 6.Chakrabarti DJ, Laughlin DE, Chen SW, Chang YA (1992) ASM handbook online, vol 3. ASM International, Novelty, pp 2.167–2.182Google Scholar
- 7.Dündar S (2004) Dendritic solidification in a copper nickel alloy. Turk J Eng Environ Sci 28:129–134Google Scholar
- 8.Doherty RD, Feest EA, Holm K (1973) Dendritic solidification of Cu–Ni alloys: part I. Initial growth of dendrite structure. Metall Mater Trans B 4:115–124Google Scholar
- 15.Koch JL, Mazumder J (2000) U.S. Patent Number 6,122,564, 19 Sept 2000Google Scholar
- 22.http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pri/section5/pri56.htm. Accessed 19 Dec 2013
- 29.Mokadem S, Bezençon C, Drezet J-M, Jacot A, Wagnière J-D, Kurz W (2004) Microstructure control during single crystal laser welding and deposition of Ni-base superalloys. In: Rappaz M, Beckermann C, Trivedi R (eds.), Solidification processes and microstructures: a symposium in Honor of Prof. W. Kurz, The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, Pennsylvania, pp 67–75Google Scholar
- 32.James MR, Gnanamuthu DS, Moores RJ (1984) Mechanical state of laser melted surfaces. Scripta Metall Mater 18:357–361Google Scholar