Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 690–701 | Cite as

Cure kinetics and rheology characterisation and modelling of ambient temperature curing epoxy resins for resin infusion/VARTM and wet layup applications



Ambient temperature curing epoxy resins are widely used as the matrix material in fibre reinforced plastics in the marine and wind energy sectors, where they are popular due to their relatively high mechanical performance yet low processing and tooling costs. To date, the characterisation of ambient curing epoxy resins has been limited to relatively simple measures, not suitable for use in heat transfer and flow process models. A complete cure kinetics and rheology model allows the prediction of the progression of degree of cure and viscosity for any time–temperature history. The progression of degree of cure of two epoxy resin systems was measured by differential scanning calorimeter and fitted to an nth order model incorporating vitrification effects. Viscosity was measured using an oscillatory rheometer and fitted to a model from the literature. The resulting cure kinetics and rheology model enables the improvement of resin infusion and wet layup processes by providing a thorough understanding of the interlinked relationship between time, temperature, degree of cure and viscosity.


Differential Scanning Calorimeter Rheology Model Resin System Cure Kinetic Resin Infusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of the McGill University Structures and Composite Materials Laboratory, particularly Associate Professor Pascal Hubert, Dr Lolei Khoun, James Kratz and Timotei Centea.


  1. 1.
    Hubert P, Johnston A, Poursartip A, Nelson K (2001) In: 33rd International SAMPE Technical Conference, Long Beach, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seifi R, Hojjati M (2005) J Compos Mater 39(11):1027. doi: 10.1177/0021998305048738.
  3. 3.
    Lee CL, Wei KH (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 77(10):2139.<2139::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-N
  4. 4.
    Lee JH, Lee JW (1994) Polym Eng Sci 34(9):742.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Wen X, Wang X, Cai ZQ, Pi P, Cheng J, Yang Z (2011) High Perform Polym 23(6):477. doi: 10.1177/0954008311417024.
  7. 7.
    Khoun L, Centea T, Hubert P (2010) J Compos Mater 44(11):1397. doi: 10.1177/0021998309353960.
  8. 8.
    Cole KC, Hechler JJ, Noel D (1991) Macromolecules 24(11):3098.
  9. 9.
    Montserrat S (1992) J Appl Polym Sci 44(3):545.
  10. 10.
    Dusi MR, Lee WI, Ciriscioli PR, Springer GS (1987) J Compos Mater 21(3):243.
  11. 11.
    Kenny JM, Apicella A, Nicolais L (1989) Polym Eng Sci 29(15):973. doi: 10.1002/pen.760291502.
  12. 12.
    Grimsley B (2005) Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Benedetto AT (1987) J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 25(9):1949.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Composite Materials, Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations